Nessie's epic fail on Belzec

[bombsaway]

Look at the cornered rat squirm!



Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!



bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

My standard of proof is the same as revisionists. Kola said they found ash in I think 31/33 graves, and there's no reason to think he was lying.

[Keen]

Look at the cornered rat squirm!



Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!



bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

My standard of proof is the same as revisionists. Kola said they found ash in I think 31/33 graves, and there's no reason to think he was lying.

Look at the cornered rat squirm!



Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!



bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

[bombsaway]

I told you Yes. Get help my brother.

[Keen]

bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

I told you Yes.

Liar.

You answered Yes, not - Yes.

Then you added this:

bombsaway:

Kola said they found ash in I think 31/33 graves, and there's no reason to think he was lying.

bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

[bombsaway]

Yes.

[Keen]

Yes.

bombsaway, it took asking you a simple - Yes. - or - No. - question 10 times before you gave a propper answer.

You now understand why all the forum members think you're a retard, right?

Are you going to appologize to the members of this forum for being such a lying coward that it takes asking you a question 10 times to get a propper answer? (I'm not going to ask you to appologize for being retarded - that's not your fault, you were born that way.)

So,

Keen:

bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

by bombsaway » Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:11 pm:

Yes.

[Keen]

Keen:

bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

by bombsaway » Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:11 pm:

Yes.

So, bombsaway:

H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec - ??

I - Can you provide credible and convincing evidence that mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec - Yes. - or - No. - ??

J - Is there a preponderance of credible and convincing evidence that mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec - Yes. - or - No. - ??

K - Can it be conclusively proven that mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec - Yes. - or - No. - ??

L - Is it a fact that mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, - Yes. - or - No. - ??

M - Can you conclusively prove that archaeologists / forensic investigators have actually located / proven the existence of mass graves at Belzec - Yes. - or - No. - ??

1 - In total, how many single, disconnected human teeth have been tangibly discovered within the 33 alleged Belzec graves / cremation pits in question: _?_.

5 - List all of the Belzec graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain at least an iota of human remains: _?_.

9 - List all of the Belzec graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: _?_.

13 - List all of the Belzec graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 23 human beings: _?_.

17 - Of the 33 alleged Belzec graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: _?_.

[Nessie]

Nessie, would you tell us what this is:

Wait... this is hilarious. What is this? Nessie (or Keen, or anyone) please do tell us/me what this is.

It is a plan of Belzec, drawn from memory, by someone who is not trying, or able, to be very accurate as to layout and dimensions. That is people for you.

[bombsaway]

Yes.

bombsaway, it took asking you a simple - Yes. - or - No. - question 10 times before you gave a propper answer.

You now understand why all the forum members think you're a retard, right?

Are you going to appologize to the members of this forum for being such a lying coward that it takes asking you a question 10 times to get a propper answer? (I'm not going to ask you to appologize for being retarded - that's not your fault, you were born that way.)

So,

Keen:

bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:

Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??

by bombsaway » Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:11 pm:

Yes.

I said in this post that it "evidences". I don't think any single piece of evidence is capable of providing "proof". Even videotapes or recordings could be doctored, etc

viewtopic.php?p=16220#p16220

[Nessie]

Recently, my partner Nessie and I joined forces and accepted Stubbles challenge to show him EXACTLY where the 2.145 million jews who were transited to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II were resettled...

This thread was supposed to be about resettlement, which Keen has instantly switched to his one and only topic, mass graves and his refusal to believe the archaeological finds.

I refuse to believe that 2.145 million Jews can be resettled from the AR camps, Chelmno and Ponary, without that leaving any evidence of it happening. Such as mass movement and resettlement would leave a ton of evidence, evidence which would have been very useful to the Nazis, as it would have proved claims of mass murder were not true.

Instead of dealing with that lack of evidence of resettlement, so-called revisionists concentrate on trying to argue that the evidence of mass murder, such as the mass graves, is not there. To really prove no mass graves, there would be evidence that the ground where witnesses claimed mass graves were located, was undisturbed, or it had little in the way of disturbances and what was buried, was not corpses. They cannot do that, so they merely dispute the evidence of large areas of disturbed ground containing cremated human remains.

[Nazgul]

To really prove no mass graves, there would be evidence that the ground where witnesses claimed mass graves were located, was undisturbed, or it had little in the way of disturbances and what was buried, was not corpses. They cannot do that, so they merely dispute the evidence of large areas of disturbed ground containing cremated human remains.

This not true, the evidence has been presented that the current site of TII was used as a Soviet artillary and aerial bombing range. This is constantly ignored by this poster as is the fact of the stops of transports at Jewish Labour camps. He demands evidence but ignores what fails to confirm some bizarre theory he has.

[Nessie]

To really prove no mass graves, there would be evidence that the ground where witnesses claimed mass graves were located, was undisturbed, or it had little in the way of disturbances and what was buried, was not corpses. They cannot do that, so they merely dispute the evidence of large areas of disturbed ground containing cremated human remains.

This not true, the evidence has been presented that the current site of TII was used as a Soviet artillary and aerial bombing range. This is constantly ignored by this poster as is the fact of the stops of transports at Jewish Labour camps. He demands evidence but ignores what fails to confirm some bizarre theory he has.

No evidence has been presented that TII was used as a range. There is evidence of the use of explosives, as Soviet soldiers joined the local Polish grave robbers. That evidence has not been ignored. You ignore all the evidence of the digging of mass graves at the camp.

Neither has the evidence of stops by transports on the way to the camp been ignored. I have done more research than you, in to what happened at the stops, and found evidence they were not to let prisoners off to go to nearby camps and ghettos. You have failed to produce evidence that prisoners were let off and ignore evidence those camps and ghettos were temporary and most closed before TII did.

[Nazgul]

No evidence has been presented that TII was used as a range. There is evidence of the use of explosives, as Soviet soldiers joined the local Polish grave robbers. That evidence has not been ignored. You ignore all the evidence of the digging of mass graves at the camp.

Evidence has been presented and conveniently forgotten by yourself. It is presented again.
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/AmicusCuriaeDemjanjuk.html

The Central Jewish Historical Commission in Poland, compiled in late 1945, [which] stated that the terrain of the Treblinka II camp had been pulverized with aerial bombs and unexploded artillery duds a few months after its liberation by an engineers unit of the 65th Red Army. This obliteration of traces of the Treblinka II camp by the Soviets took place because the Soviet propaganda machine tried to attach a 3,500,000 victim-count to this small, 12-hectare transit camp. Apparently, the Soviets were afraid that the Allies might request an international commission of investigation of the camp, as demanded by the November 15th, 1942 report of the underground government of the Warsaw ghetto. The report of the Central Jewish Historical Commission in Poland was explicit in putting the blame for this obliteration of the camp where it belonged, on the Red Army, for the: "premeditated destruction of evidence of German crimes and atrocities as well as profanation of partially cremated human remains and ashes."

[Nessie]

No evidence has been presented that TII was used as a range. There is evidence of the use of explosives, as Soviet soldiers joined the local Polish grave robbers. That evidence has not been ignored. You ignore all the evidence of the digging of mass graves at the camp.

Evidence has been presented and conveniently forgotten by yourself. Due to this dishonesty the admins should decide your fate.
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/AmicusCuriaeDemjanjuk.html

The Central Jewish Historical Commission in Poland, compiled in late 1945, [which] stated that the terrain of the Treblinka II camp had been pulverized with aerial bombs and unexploded artillery duds a few months after its liberation by an engineers unit of the 65th Red Army. This obliteration of traces of the Treblinka II camp by the Soviets took place because the Soviet propaganda machine tried to attach a 3,500,000 victim-count to this small, 12-hectare transit camp. Apparently, the Soviets were afraid that the Allies might request an international commission of investigation of the camp, as demanded by the November 15th, 1942 report of the underground government of the Warsaw ghetto. The report of the Central Jewish Historical Commission in Poland was explicit in putting the blame for this obliteration of the camp where it belonged, on the Red Army, for the: "premeditated destruction of evidence of German crimes and atrocities as well as profanation of partially cremated human remains and ashes."

The Commission was condemning the Soviets for destroying evidence, not that they were using it as a "range". Do you know what a range is? Can you not understand your own source? The Commission must have not been aware that the use of explosives was by soldiers joining in with the grave robbing and that it did not involve aerial bombing, for which there is no evidence.

Now, stop lying that I ignore that the camp was subject to the use of explosives and remember, this thread is about Belzec, not TII.

[Nazgul]

The Commission was condemning the Soviets for destroying evidence, not that they were using it as a "range".

The lack of comprehension by the above poster is wanting. Let me highlight the important bits.
The Central Jewish Historical Commission in Poland, compiled in late 1945, [which] stated that the terrain of the Treblinka II camp had been pulverized with aerial bombs and unexploded artillery duds a few months after its liberation by an engineers unit of the 65th Red Army.

To pulverize something means to do great damage to it or to destroy it completely; this is not just destroying evidence.

While the thread is on Belzec, my response was due to the posters derailing here