Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:27 pm
Not all 33 graves contain cremains but most of them.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
And we have yet another low IQ retard who has trouble with yes or no questions.
Let's see if the retard understands the question now.
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Last edited by Keen on Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:37 pm
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:27 pm
Not all 33 graves contain cremains but most of them.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
And we have yet another low IQ retard who has trouble with yes or no questions.
Let's see if the retard understands the question now.
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:27 pm
Not all 33 graves contain cremains but most of them.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
And we have yet another low IQ retard who has trouble with yes or no questions!
Let's see if the retard understands the question now.
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
this is you, they're the same thing IMO . cremains are "ashes of a cremated human body"
so you can play some semantic games and say no human remains were found, whatever dude
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
this is you, they're the same thing IMO . cremains are "ashes of a cremated human body"
so you can play some semantic games and say no human remains were found, whatever dude
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
what are human remains to you lol? how do you define this. would be necessary to answering any question from you
what I am understanding from you is if you burn a human and dump the ashes into grave, this is not human remains.
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 8:57 pmLook at the cornered rat squirm!
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
There's no squirming because I think you are mentally ill and feel sorry for you, nevertheless see this post
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 10:57 pmLook at the cornered rat squirm!
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Yes,
"Finally, only occasionally were ashes mixed with soil found, and only very rarely any human remains."
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
