Extreme believer traits and characteristics - Join in

[borjastick]

Extreme believer traits and characteristics - Join in

Here's a list of some traits and oddities about the extreme believers we get here. No need to name them as we all know who they are... Please add to this list and don't spare the horses.

Inability to clearly understand solid and science based evidence and proof, preferring lightweight circumstantial evidence and hearsay thinking it has the same value.

Cannot use logic.

Love israel and think ashkenazis are genuinely directly linked to ancient israelites.

Believe that it all started on October 7th, that israel isn't mass murdering and starving Gazan Palestinians and that Gazan Palestinians have no claim on the region.

Are politically extreme lefties, love open border politics and believe in the 'Refugees welcome' ideology.

Hate Trump and think MAGA voters are Nazis and fascists.

Love Pride Month and absolutely men can become women and adore phrases such as 'Birthing Person'.

Ignore the numerous elephants in the holocaust room and display unhinged behaviour and a total inability to see that not only were there never 6m jews in danger but gas chambers were real and a corpse can be cremated to near dust in just 15 minutes.

Physically weak and mentally unstable.

Low sperm count and only speak to like minded people.

Loners, sad, losers.

[pilgrimofdark]

Some that I've observed in my short time here. (Examples below are hyperbole to illustrate the points.)

Conclusory statements of dogma rather than argumentation serve as non-sequiturs intended to shut down debate.

Time-wasting: "If you had read these 7 books of 1,600+ pages each written in an extinct Indo-European language with 450,000 combined footnotes to non-digitized Soviet show trial archives, you would have educated yourself on why Kurt Gerstein is corroborated."

Burden-shifting: "If you can't point to where Jews were resettled in the Zio-Shire, then x million were steamed/gassed and buried and dug up and burned and buried. No other option."

Double-standard of education/training
> "revisionists don't have the training necessary to evaluate the Holocaust"
> "read this Bachelor's degree research paper: it proves the Holocaust"
> *would ridicule a revisionist for holding a PhD in the History of Ideas*

Refusal to disavow or acknowledge violence against revisionism
> "why are there so few revisionists?"
> *blows up a mild doubter and his wife*
> "you can't even get enough to peer review your books"
> *severe beating requiring hospitalization of a revisionist*
> "if more people agreed with you, they'd speak up"
> *someone speaks up, sent to jail for years*
> "no one takes you seriously enough to buy your books"
> *bans bookstore from payment processor, bans books from online marketplaces, bans books from public libraries, bans books from "banned books" lists*
> "why aren't there public gatherings of prominent revisionists?"
> *protests, drive-by shootings, vandalism of cars, bombing offices/houses of revisionists*

Lack of source criticism leading to non-falsifiable miracle-based proofs
If any number of people say something, then it happened. Impossible to disprove.
> "If 12 people say CO poisoning turns people black and purple and green, then that's how it happened."
> "If 25 people say a Toyota Camry drove 450 MPH, then that's proof a Camry engine can and did reach that speed."
> "If 70,000 people saw the sun stop and dance in the sky, then it's proven to have happened."
similar miracle impossible to disprove

[borjastick]

Indeed pilgrimofdark the use of the excuse 'he's not the right kind of expert' wears pretty thin pretty quickly. Oft used by the 'climate crisis' brigade when they are happy for any man and his dog whatever their credentials to agree with them on man made climate doom but try criticise the climate argument or in this case the holocaust and these buffoons scream 'hes not an expert'. Such as in the Fred Leuchter case.

[HansHill]

From what I have seen (and maybe this is a recent development) is that the most rabid zionists and Holocaust enjoyers are right wing.

[Wahrheitssucher]

Some that I've observed in my short time here. (Examples below are hyperbole to illustrate the points.)

Conclusory statements of dogma rather than argumentation serve as non-sequiturs intended to shut down debate.

Time-wasting: "If you had read these 7 books of 1,600+ pages each written in an extinct Indo-European language with 450,000 combined footnotes to non-digitized Soviet show trial archives, you would have educated yourself on why Kurt Gerstein is corroborated."

Burden-shifting: "If you can't point to where Jews were resettled in the Zio-Shire, then x million were steamed/gassed and buried and dug up and burned and buried. No other option."

Double-standard of education/training
> "revisionists don't have the training necessary to evaluate the Holocaust"
> "read this Bachelor's degree research paper: it proves the Holocaust"
> *would ridicule a revisionist for holding a PhD in the History of Ideas*

Refusal to disavow or acknowledge violence against revisionism
> "why are there so few revisionists?"
> *blows up a mild doubter and his wife*
> "you can't even get enough to peer review your books"
> *severe beating requiring hospitalization of a revisionist*
> "if more people agreed with you, they'd speak up"
> *someone speaks up, sent to jail for years*
> "no one takes you seriously enough to buy your books"
> *bans bookstore from payment processor, bans books from online marketplaces, bans books from public libraries, bans books from "banned books" lists*
> "why aren't there public gatherings of prominent revisionists?"
> *protests, drive-by shootings, vandalism of cars, bombing offices/houses of revisionists*

Lack of source criticism leading to non-falsifiable miracle-based proofs
If any number of people say something, then it happened. Impossible to disprove.
> "If 12 people say CO poisoning turns people black and purple and green, then that's how it happened."
> "If 25 people say a Toyota Camry drove 450 MPH, then that's proof a Camry engine can and did reach that speed."
> "If 70,000 people saw the sun stop and dance in the sky, then it's proven to have happened."
similar miracle impossible to disprove

Excellent!