The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

For more adversarial interactions
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:57 pm So, "go ahead and tell us all where you think the Jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up."
We're working together on a joint project co-authoring a paper proving the resettlement of 2.145 million jews.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14961#p14961
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2858
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:07 pm
Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:57 pm So, "go ahead and tell us all where you think the Jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up."
We're working together on a joint project co-authoring a paper proving the resettlement of 2.145 million jews.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14961#p14961
To use your own words;

"I do have evidence of resettlement - proof in fact..."

I am now doubting that claim, since you refuse to show me any of that evidence. Which means I win the resettlement debate.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:12 pm
Keen wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:07 pm
Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:57 pm So, "go ahead and tell us all where you think the Jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up."
We're working together on a joint project co-authoring a paper proving the resettlement of 2.145 million jews.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14961#p14961
To use your own words;

"I do have evidence of resettlement - proof in fact..."

I am now doubting that claim, since you refuse to show me any of that evidence. Which means I win the resettlement debate.
Did you forget to take your meds today Nessie?

We're working together on a joint project co-authoring a paper proving the resettlement of 2.145 million jews.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14961#p14961
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2858
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:13 pm
Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:12 pm
Keen wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:07 pm

We're working together on a joint project co-authoring a paper proving the resettlement of 2.145 million jews.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14961#p14961
To use your own words;

"I do have evidence of resettlement - proof in fact..."

I am now doubting that claim, since you refuse to show me any of that evidence. Which means I win the resettlement debate.
Did you forget to take your meds today Nessie?

We're working together on a joint project co-authoring a paper proving the resettlement of 2.145 million jews.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14961#p14961
I agreed to that, based on your claim that you had evidence to prove resettlement. It has become clear that you lied about that.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:17 pm
Keen wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:13 pm
Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 4:12 pm

To use your own words;

"I do have evidence of resettlement - proof in fact..."

I am now doubting that claim, since you refuse to show me any of that evidence. Which means I win the resettlement debate.
Did you forget to take your meds today Nessie?

We're working together on a joint project co-authoring a paper proving the resettlement of 2.145 million jews.

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14961#p14961
I agreed to that, based on your claim that you had evidence to prove resettlement. It has become clear that you lied about that.
Not true Nessie.

As we work together on our paper:

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14994#p14994

you will see.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The bombsaway vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:44 pm What do you think happened to those Jews who passed through those camps?
Are you suggesting that they didn't pass through those camps?

Can you prove that?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The bombsaway vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:38 pm The point of my quote there is that revisionists can scrutinize the other side but can't handle scrutiny of their positions.
Says who?

bombsaway, would you please scrutinize this position made by Greg Gerdes:
OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY FIVE PEOPLE.

...

CLOSING STATEMENT OF FACT: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, this website's opening / fundamental statement of fact can be LEGALLY established as fact in a U.S. court.

https://thisisaboutscience.com/
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply