...Stubble has shared an excellent find (thank you!), one which has had me spend a couple obsessive hours reading through with a great deal of intrigue -- the Organization Todt handbook:
https://archive.org/details/HandbookOfT ... DTOTUK1945
This information expands upon some earlier findings shared by another member of the forum, Nazgul, who to my knowledge first shared a revisionist perspective on the network of Zwangsarbeitslagers fur Juden across former German-occupied territories.
In section IVB on page 387 of the PDF file for the OT Handbook (here: https://archive.org/download/HandbookOf ... K-1945.pdf), we find the description for "Communists, Partisans, Jews, Special Convict Units" (Zwangsarbeiter):
For Jews in France specifically, some are documented becoming conscripted in the later months of the war (PDF, p. 389):Russians and Spanish communists, Polish and Czech conscripts,
partisans, convicts (German soldiers and foreign civilians),
miscellaneous politically hostile elements (foreign), workers considered
untractable, homosexuals, Jews, part-Jews and state-less individuals
comprised the lowest category, that of Zwangsarbeiter. Ages in this
category are as unlimited as they are in the highest category, that
of the Germans themselves. Russian boys of 12 have been mentioned in
captured OT documents, while those of 14 are taken for granted. The
Germans did not manage to any considerable extent to put their hands
on Russian youths approaching the age of military usefulness outside of
those which were seized in the early stages of the war and have
since matured by three years. This limitation does not however apply
to the Poles, Czechs, etc.
On the same page, we are reminded of the Hungarian Jews sent into Germany:All Jews in France between the ages of 20 to 31 (July 1943) and all Jews of 1924 Class (June 1944) were assigned to the OT.
The reason we know with a bit more clarity what happened in France and Germany than, say, Ostland or Ukraine is (PDF, p. 123):A mass levy of 150,000 Hungarian Jews was made in August 1944. This levy had probably been proceeded by similar forcible levies, mainly recruited from Central Europe and the Balkans.
No administration means very few records, simply put. So, "where are the Jews"? Well, if they were working in the East, we now have further clarification for why the records are so limited....there were practically no OBLs in Russia and consequently no stabilised administrative HQ...
But what about the non-working Jews? Here is how Einsatzgruppen West (EGW; oversight in France, Belgium and the Netherlands) addressed this (PDF, p. 333):
This late-war document indicates the family of working Jews (i.e. Jews who are not working) would sometimes be receiving wages for the working Jew.Jewish workers are paid according to the following circular,
published by EGW:
"Wages for Jewish workers may be granted according to the
"Arbeitsbedingungen des Militarbefehlhabers" (Terms for labor set
down by the Military Commander). Obey may be employed in line with
the output principle whereby their efficiency rating must be severely
considered. Only wages for work actually performed are to be
granted. No claims can be made for continuance of payments in case
of illness. Extra pay for overtime., night work, work on Sundays or
holidays is not authorized. Donations in form of premiums of any
description are prohibited. Lodging in closed camps and messing are
free, but 12 francs per day are retained for costs of messing.
In addition % of the wages are retained as taxes. Family allowances
are not authorized. Social insurances of any kind are not in effect
for Jewish workers, but private insurance is permissible. For the
defrayal of personal needs, pocket money of 20 francs per day is
deducted from the wages and paid out in cash. In case of inferior output
of work, deduction of pocket money from the wages may be denied.
The balance of the wages is transferred by the firm to the family
of the Jewish worker."
But was it a lot of Jews? Or just a few? The table on p. 460 of the PDF indicates a total of ~65,000 forced laborers between France and Poland combined, and reinforced that "a majority of forced labour are Jews, 'Communists', and penal units". Likewise, we see on the following page that of ~250,000 forced laborers in Germany, they are reportedly of the same composition (with Jews as prominent). Since we know well-over half of the forced laborers mentioned are Jews in the case of Germany by this time (includes the ~150,000 Hungarian Jews), we can reasonably infer that perhaps up to half of the ~65,000 in France and Poland may also be Jewish. But then we have to factor in their families... Let's assume they had modestly-sized families of five (5) for the early 20th century. We might say (for France + Poland):
30,000 x 5 = 150,000 Jews
Another chip off the ol' 6 million?

Does it not follow that Hungarian Jews would also have their families kept alive? We know with certainty that the incessant gassing-cremation was not occurring, per photographs shown and discussed in Mattogno's recent work (here: https://holocausthandbooks.com/wp-conte ... 1-posl.pdf), and we also know that at least 86 camps explicitly including Jewish children opened up in Austria after mid-1944 (see: viewtopic.php?p=9325&sid=22161b181b9995 ... 10bb#p9325). Overall, it seems we can reasonably count Hungarian Jews as among the living (and being globally dispersed) by war's end, for the most part.
But what about Jews in the Ostland and Ukraine? As already mentioned, with such fragmented administration in the Eastern territories, very little is known, or even can be known. Even for Western camps, quantifying information is vague (PDF, p. 279):
That said, quite a bit of information on most other categories of information about these camps has already been gathered on this forum. Here is some comprehensive data on the Zwangsarbeitslagers for Jews, specifically (hover over any map marker to see details, including open-closing dates -- green markers represent multiple camps at one location, red are single-camp sites):Numbered worker detachments are, however, very rarely identified in captured documents, and systematic records are apparently kept not below EG level, if kept at all.
https://www.mapcustomizer.com/map/Zwang ... ndUkraine7
The source data for the map above is archived here:
Zwangsarbeitslager for Jews in "Reichskommissariat Ostland": https://archive.is/Y1IUO
And here for Austria, the General Government, and other locations:
Zwangsarbeitslager for Jews in Österreich: https://archive.is/Gd3fe
Zwangsarbeitslager for Jews in Various Locations (A-G): https://archive.is/fTYhS
Zwangsarbeitslager for Jews in Various Locations (G-L): https://archive.is/6dh7h
Zwangsarbeitslager for Jews in Various Locations (L-S): https://archive.is/IFhJj
Zwangsarbeitslager for Jews in Various Locations (S-Z): https://archive.is/MPVL5
Of particular interest are the closing dates -- many of these camps have closing dates very late in the war or no known closing date at all. If closing dates are not known, this by default suggests they may have remained open.
[EDIT: Worth also noting that these lists of labor camps are certainly incomplete -- the total number could be much greater.]
For the Zwangarbeitslagers in the General Government, I break them down, here:
From the OT Handbook, we find that the personal camps where Jewish workers were kept is generally fairly close to the actual work site (PDF, p. 283):[Total known Jewish labor camps in each GG district:]
Silesia = 213
Reichsgau Wartheland = 205
District Galicia = 164
District Lublin = 126
District Radom = 93
District Krakow = 84
District Warsaw = 72
Reichsgebiet = 40
District Bialystok = 7
Reichsgau Sudetenland = 17
Reichsgau Danzig-Westpreußen = 8
Reichsgau Oberdonau = 1
What is not known, for the most part, is the size of these camps. There are at least some confirmed to have had inmates numbering in the thousands but others were as low as in the dozens or hundreds.
Of the 1,030 total, here is some of the data which I found most important:
459 of these entries indicate the camp closing date is only assumed based on the time of its "last mention" ("letzte Erwähnung")
204 were reported (or assumed) closed no earlier than sometime in 1944 (with even mid-to-late 1944 not being uncommon)
20 were reported closed in 1945
About 10-15% have no known closing date at all
346 of the 1,030 entries have no map location due to missing/insufficient information (many others have only an approximate location)
[This shows that many Jewish labor camps likely remained open long after 'extermination' was allegedly in full-swing, contradicting the narrative.]
The focus of these reports is upon the workforce strength (number of men), so it is difficult to confirm whether family members were kept on-site as among the "accommodations" mentioned here (for working men), or if families were instead kept off-site at other facilities more easily guarded (those unfit for work being less of a threat, militarily).Personal Lager (Camps) or Lager, as they are commonly called,
are situated as near to construction sites as is found practicable,
the furthest distance on record in the West, being twenty miles.
Efforts are made to keep men of the same nationality together.
Thus barracks housing men of one nationality form "centres", e.g.,
Centre francais, in charge of a Hilfslagerfuhrer (see para. 118
vi. above). Worker detachments assigned to a particular OT-firm
are similarly billeted together as far as possible. This dual
arrangement does not ordinarily involve complications, inasmuch
as foreign worker detachments are assigned to particular firms
not only on the basis of their occupational skill and specialty
(or lack of either) but also on the basis of race and nationality.
Thus, for example, certain firms are considered to be peculiarly
equipped to employ Jewish workers.
The barracks are standardised in several types and contain
accommodations for from 78 to about 150 men. The average camp
contains accommodations for about 500 men. Camps holding more than
2,000 are considered impractical.
As far as the administration of these camps for evacuated Jews and the guards involved, this OT Handbook reveals it as many of us have argued for the last couple years: many of the guards would be called to the front, with few surviving the war. Those who did survive will have seen only mundane Jewish labor activities and were not wishing to self-incriminate (assuming any atrocities), in any case. Regarding the composition of camp guards (p. 195):
Overall, this information from the Organization Todt (OT) Handbook helps shed further light on the fate of Jews during WW2 and the evidence of their persistence in great numbers in these Eastern territories, rather than being consumed by 'gassing' and buried at property-sorting camps (Reinhardt camps) per the official 'Holocaust' narrative.The task of enforcing law and order in the OT Camps and building sites lies
chiefly in the hands of the Schutzkommando, also known by the older
name of Schutzkorps (both abbreviated SK). The staff of the
Schutzkommando, called Schutzkommandofuhrung, is headed by a
Schutzkommandofuhrer, and is attached to the section Frontfuhrung,
as the Legal and Disciplinary Sub-section discussed above.
The individual SK units are administered at OBL level; their
duties comprise the guarding of construction sites, warehouses,
machines, explosives, fuel dumps, motor vehicle parks, material
equipment and food depots, and personnel camps within their respective
OBL sectors. They are also employed in convoying prisoners, personnel
and material. In convoys one SK man is theoretically assigned to
guard 20 workers; in the case of "untrustworthy" personnel, such
as returned fugitives, the TO/WE calls for one SK man to ten "guarded"
personnel. Due to the shortage of SK men, the actual proportion
is about one third of TO/WE requirements. In the Balkans, Poland
and Russia, the SK units had to be perpetually on the alert against
partisan raids and were often fortified into Stutzpunkte (Strong Points),
By 1943 a critical shortage of SK men was caused by the Wehrmacht's
drive to find suitable personnel for its armed forces. This weeding-
out process left in SK only those Germans who were physically unfit
for active military service. (One SK Identity Book discloses under
the heading "identifying scars or wounds", "right arm amputated").
The resulting shortage of personnel forced the SK organization
to look for replacements among the foreign groups. In the EGW,
for instance, most of the foreign SK personnel was recruited from
among the French, Dutch and Flemish nationals, and came from the
ranks of the collaborationists.