Request for support from Nessie

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Request for support from Nessie

Post by Archie »

One of Nessie's major witnesses, brazenly lying in court.

User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2009
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Request for support from Nessie

Post by Nessie »

Archie wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 4:22 am One of Nessie's major witnesses, brazenly lying in court.

Yes, the identification of Demjanjuk was challenged in court and the witnesses found to be unreliable and unable to identify him. When a Nazi denied being responsible, his defence is able to challenge witnesses. That explains why in the other camp trials, witnesses were not challenged, because the Nazis admitted to the allegations and crimes. Demjanjuk denied responsibility or being there, but just like every other Nazi, he did not provide any evidence to challenge that gassings took place at TII, or for mass resettlement.

Demjanjuk's testimony was all over the place, as he conveniently forgot and made false claims, as he brazenly lied in court.
K
Keen
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Request for support from Nessie

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 10:32 am It is normal witness behaviour to use figures of speech, repeat atrocity stories and lie.
Nessie,

*9 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Not one of the alleged - “HUGE MASS GRAVES” - of Treblinka II alleged by so-called “eyewitnesses” - has ever been proven to exist - ??

XIV - Is it - True. - or False. - that; It is common for juries in the U.S. to be given instructions that include some form of the following: “If you decide that a witness has deliberately testified untruthfully about something important, you may choose not to believe anything that witness said.” - ??
Last edited by Keen on Sat Jun 28, 2025 4:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
K
Keen
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Request for support from Nessie

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2024 4:23 pm I complied a list of available online evidence for TII... such as... archaeological finds of large areas of disturbed ground containing cremated remains... That is corroborating evidence to support the witness claims.
Providing so-called "evidence" that allegedly "supports" the liewitness allegations that have already been proven to be lies is meaningless. No amount of contrary "evidence" can overrule what has already been proven, and that is:

We know, with 100% certainty, that the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II, in which verified human remains have been tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY FIVE PEOPLE.

NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - PROVES - NO MASS MURDER

Of course, if Nessie disagrees with the above, all he has to do is show us a "huge mass grave" with the remains of 6 people in it.

What are you waiting for Nessie?

What are you so afraid of?
Post Reply