The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Nessie you think the Holocaust happened and consider critical analysis to the contrary as "argument from incredulity", and therefore illogical and fallacious. You've been very clear that the Holocaust is de facto self-evident, despite not having said those words to my knowledge. You have over 1,000 ...

My personal opinion as to why this doesn't feature much (or at all) in propaganda, is that microwave technology was little understood by the layman around this time. The stories that were whipped up in hysteria, tended to be as explosive, highly emotive, and diabolical as possible. "Micro waves ...

I thought it was clear, what I was saying. I know that Green rebuts Rudolf, because of the evidence that homicidal gassings happened. I cannot make it any clearer or succinct than that. If you still do not understand, then I cannot help you, due to your inability to get to grips with evidencing ...

I thought it was clear, what I was saying. I know that Green rebuts Rudolf, because of the evidence that homicidal gassings happened. I cannot make it any clearer or succinct than that. If you still do not understand, then I cannot help you, due to your inability to get to grips with evidencing ...

I am not a chemist, so I cannot reliably say who is correct, based on their analysis and testing. I can reliably say that Green is correct and Rudolf is wrong, based on the evidence of usage of the Leichenkellers. There is evidence to prove mass gassings. There is no evidence to prove delousing ...

I did a deep dive on this incident some years back, and the entire thing was a huge mess from the orthodox side. At that time, the wikipedia article for the incident, used as its primary citation, the works of "Weronika Kuzniar", her paper titled "Gleiwitz Casus Beli". The problem here, is that this ...

It is the other way around, Green rebuts Rudolf. Go through the Dr Green / Rudolf exchanges again. Post here what points you believe Dr Green makes that "rebut" Rudolf. Use as many as you like, but stick to Dr Green's own words, not your interpretation of them. Edit: Actually this would be wildly ...

Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Mar 25, 2025 1:04 pm You cannot prove Hoess lied. To do that, you need evidence of what actually happened inside the Kremas, that was not mass gassings.

>You cannot prove Hoess lied
>Hoess testified to murdering 2,500,000 people

Stop the charade. He lied through his teeth.

It is your reliance on your "understanding" that is the flaw. Just because you cannot understand how it was possible, does not therefore mean it did not happen. No matter how well supported your understanding is, the evidence is that mass gassings took place inside the Kremas. Logically, when your ...

You are stuck on repeat, never acknowledging your logical and evidential flaws. To me, it is obvious that claiming all the witnesses lied, because of the ways they described gassings, therefore there were no gas chambers, is a logically flawed argument. To me, it is obvious that the way you declare ...

I'm not sure I understand the point about "maintenance costs". Do you mean the media, museums, academics, etc whose career or reputation in whole or in part depends on the mainstream narrative? If so, I would disagree on this point: the mainstream account affords a huge industry that, if anything ...

Interesting. So when public figures condemn controversial ideas, what they are really saying is "there is a non-zero chance that I am actually an expert in this field, I understand the arguments very thoroughly and you are all so full of shit but here we are condemning it anyway" Got it ...

Why would Hungary admit to protecting their Jews, and then loosing a huge majority to the A-B gas chambers in a few short months in 1944? What about Romania, where there was a separate action, whereby Romanians shot c400,000 Jews and Roma. Why do the present governments still admit to that? I think ...

You do not want to be fair at all, hence your false analogy. What I have shown and you have helpfully quoted above, is that enough detail can be found in basic, English, online sources, to say that the vast majority of NK defectors have gone to SK, that the rate of defections during the Cold War ...

For all of these reasons and more, no exterminationist will be able to put a number on it, let alone tell you where they are or where they went, or where they died. At best they will give you a range, at worst they will be completely honest and tell you its impossible . Just to remind our friend ...