Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2026 5:17 pm
I do.Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'
Unread post by Stubble » Mon Jul 06, 2026 9:46 am
This is a presentation I ran across on YouTube proporting to rebut the Resvisionist Thesis.
viewtopic.php?t=846
His take on Aktion 1005 seems novel. Apparently, they didn't just erase physical graves, but, also all of the related records to the alleged extermination program.
I haven't been through the whole thing yet, but, it seems he doesn't seem to rely on the shoes. Hopefully I haven't spoke too soon, there is still some run time, and he may kick back on the shoes at some point.
Bonus content, 'Robert Jan Van Pelt on Comedy Cellar' starts at around 39 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/live/Kv2NkT_qa1 ... uFu7IhmPkh
Anybody feel like cracking into any of this and discussing it?
This retarded POS alleges that:
And he pretends to look at this as some kind of jurist."The following are the accepted numbers of those killed in the extermination camps alone: Chelmno: 360,000, Belzec: 500,000, Sobibor: 250,000, Treblinka: 840,000 [Total: 1,950,000]"
Yet, as far as I know, he has never even attempted to rebut the following:
The guy is a low IQ clown.OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.
Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be - LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
I'd like to see him try his legal shtick with Mr. Gerdes.
But it's not suprising that he doesn't have the intelligence or courage to accept the HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE
