The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 4:14 am Personally, I think they got Eichmann.

I also think Eichmann is a traitor to his people. To be generous to him, I will say, he was not the first. Honestly I can only imagine his surprise when Hoess confessed to murdering 3,000,000 jews at Auschwitz.

He told them everything they wanted to hear. He affirmed an order, he affirmed geysers of blood, Treblinka, Auschwitz, the whole 9.

(I, strongly dislike Eichmann)

Moshe Landau

Moshe Landau (Hebrew: משה לנדוי; 29 April 1912 – 1 May 2011)[1] was an Israeli judge. He served on the Supreme Court of Israel from 1953 until his retirement in 1982. Landau was the fifth President of the Supreme Court, from 1980 to 1982.[2]

In 1961, Landau presided over the landmark Eichmann trial.[9]

In 1987, he headed the Landau Commission, investigating Shin Bet's procedures. The commission found instances of perjury and legal violations, acknowledging the use of "moderate physical pressure" in interrogations.[10] However, this drew criticism from human rights groups, who maintained that the practices authorized by the commission amounted to torture.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moshe_Lan ... _education

Landau Commission

The Landau Commission was a three-man Commission set up by the Israeli Government in 1987 following a long-running scandal over the deaths of two Palestinian prisoners in custody and the wrongful conviction of a Circassian IDF officer. The Commission, headed by former Supreme Court Justice Moshe Landau, found that the GSS (General Security Service/Shabak/Shin Bet) interrogators routinely used physical force during the interrogation of prisoners and then committed perjury at subsequent trials. In its conclusion, approved by Cabinet in November 1987, it lay down guidelines for the use of a "moderate measure of physical pressure". The details of the recommended methods were described in the classified appendix to the report.[1] In 1994 the UN Committee Against Torture stated: "The Landau Commission Report, permitting as it does 'moderate physical pressure' as a lawful mode of interrogation, is completely unacceptable to this Committee."[2]

The Commission found that interrogators were permitted "from time to time to employ means of pressure, including physical pressure." They found this measure "unavoidable" and "an interrogation tool of utmost importance"[8]

Interrogation techniques
The Commission found that the use of violence against Palestinians suspected of terrorism and other Palestinian prisoners was an acceptable method of interrogation.

Elsewhere they state: "The effective interrogation of terrorist suspects is impossible without the use of means of pressure, in order to overcome an obdurate will not to disclose information and to overcome the fear of the person under interrogation that harm will befall him from his own organization, if he does reveal information."[16] And: "The means of pressure should principally take the form of non-violent psychological pressure through a vigorous and extensive interrogation, with the use of stratagems, including acts of deception. However, when these do not attain their purpose, the exertion of a moderate measure of physical pressure cannot be avoided."[17]

In 1968 the International Committee for the Red Cross issued a report on Nablus Prison, one of the IDF's detention centers in the recently captured West Bank. It found:

• "Suspension of the detainee by the hands and simultaneous traction of his other members for hours at a time until he loses consciousness.

• Burns with cigarette stubs.

• Blows by rods on the genitals.

• Tying up and blindfolding for days.

• Bites by dogs.

• Electric shocks at the temples, the mouth, the chest and testicles."

The first study of interrogation techniques following the Landau Commission was published in March 1991 by the Israeli Human Rights organisation B'tselem: "The Interrogation of Palestinians during the Intifada: Ill-Treatment, Moderate Physical Pressure or Torture?"[31] Based on interviews with 41 prisoners the report concluded:

"A number of interrogation methods appear to be common, even routine in the group we interviewed. Virtually all our sample were subject to: verbal abuse, humiliation and threats of injury; sleep and food deprivation; hooding for prolonged periods; enforced standing for long periods, sometimes in an enclosed space, hands bound behind back and legs tied ("al-Shabah"); being bound in other painful ways (such as the "banana" position); prolonged periods of painful confinement in small specially constructed cells (the "closet" or "refrigerator") and severe and prolonged beatings on all parts of the body, resulting in injuries requiring medical treatment."[32]

A 1995 official report by Miriam Ben-Porat, made public in 2000, showed that Shin Bet "routinely" went beyond the "moderate physical pressure" authorised by the Landau Commission. In the report, Israel admitted for the first time that Palestinian detainees suspected of terrorism were tortured during the First Intifada, between 1988 and 1992.[33]

A 2009 report by B'Tselem into the Shin Bet interrogation facility at Petah Tikva, based on testimony from 121 Palestinians, stated that: "In the interrogation room, detainees are forced to sit bound to a rigid chair unable to move, for hours and even days, causing intense pain in some cases. The hygienic conditions are appalling: detainees are sometimes denied showers and not given a change of clothes and toilet paper. At least some cells reek and have mould. The food is of poor quality and quantity, and detainees lose weight. During interrogation, detainees are exposed to threats, including threats against family members, and sometimes to violence. Other severe means include exposing the detainees to extreme heat and cold and depriving them of sleep."[34]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landau_Commission

Callafangers wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 4:13 am Hello Bundeswehr, welcome to the forum. No, I don't think it's reasonable to suggest that the person captured was not Eichmann. That takes any alleged conspiracy to much greater heights, far beyond and more extraordinary than anything which evidence can support.

Regarding Eichmann, consider reviewing this thread for more information:

'Eichmann and the Sassen Tapes'
viewtopic.php?t=358

...as well as the Holocaust Encyclopedia entry on him:

'Eichmann, Adolf'
https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/witne ... adolf/273/

Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 4:14 am Personally, I think they got Eichmann.

I also think Eichmann is a traitor to his people. To be generous to him, I will say, he was not the first. Honestly I can only imagine his surprise when Hoess confessed to murdering 3,000,000 jews at Auschwitz. Then there were those who tried to hang the blame on him before they danced at the end of a rope. (Or walked)

Keep in mind, the einsatzgruppen trials resulted in hangings because there were no orders. Eichmann figured he could slip the noose by claiming there were.

He told them everything they wanted to hear. He affirmed an order, he affirmed geysers of blood, Treblinka, Auschwitz, the whole 9.

He still swung though. He'd have swung just the same if he had told the truth, difference is, it would just be his pants that were stained, not his honor and the honor of his people...

(I, strongly dislike Eichmann)

Oh, and WELCOME TO THE FORUM!!!

Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 12:03 pm

Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 4:14 am Personally, I think they got Eichmann.

I also think Eichmann is a traitor to his people. To be generous to him, I will say, he was not the first. Honestly I can only imagine his surprise when Hoess confessed to murdering 3,000,000 jews at Auschwitz.

He told them everything they wanted to hear. He affirmed an order, he affirmed geysers of blood, Treblinka, Auschwitz, the whole 9.

(I, strongly dislike Eichmann)

Hard to judge him without being in his shoes. Who knows what you or I would do in the hands of depraved monsters who now proudly boast of raping prisoners (some to death, it seems) who were at their mercy?



The Israeli judge who presided over the Eichmann 'trial', Moshe Landau is also the judge who made torture legal in Israel.

Moshe Landau

Moshe Landau (Hebrew: משה לנדוי; 29 April 1912 – 1 May 2011)[1] was an Israeli judge. He served on the Supreme Court of Israel from 1953 until his retirement in 1982. Landau was the fifth President of the Supreme Court, from 1980 to 1982.[2]

In 1961, Landau presided over the landmark Eichmann trial.[9]

In 1987, he headed the Landau Commission, investigating Shin Bet's procedures. The commission found instances of perjury and legal violations, acknowledging the use of "moderate physical pressure" in interrogations.[10] However, this drew criticism from human rights groups, who maintained that the practices authorized by the commission amounted to torture.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moshe_Lan ... _education

Landau Commission

The Landau Commission was a three-man Commission set up by the Israeli Government in 1987 following a long-running scandal over the deaths of two Palestinian prisoners in custody and the wrongful conviction of a Circassian IDF officer. The Commission, headed by former Supreme Court Justice Moshe Landau, found that the GSS (General Security Service/Shabak/Shin Bet) interrogators routinely used physical force during the interrogation of prisoners and then committed perjury at subsequent trials. In its conclusion, approved by Cabinet in November 1987, it lay down guidelines for the use of a "moderate measure of physical pressure". The details of the recommended methods were described in the classified appendix to the report.[1] In 1994 the UN Committee Against Torture stated: "The Landau Commission Report, permitting as it does 'moderate physical pressure' as a lawful mode of interrogation, is completely unacceptable to this Committee."[2]

The Commission found that interrogators were permitted "from time to time to employ means of pressure, including physical pressure." They found this measure "unavoidable" and "an interrogation tool of utmost importance"[8]

Interrogation techniques
The Commission found that the use of violence against Palestinians suspected of terrorism and other Palestinian prisoners was an acceptable method of interrogation.

Elsewhere they state: "The effective interrogation of terrorist suspects is impossible without the use of means of pressure, in order to overcome an obdurate will not to disclose information and to overcome the fear of the person under interrogation that harm will befall him from his own organization, if he does reveal information."[16] And: "The means of pressure should principally take the form of non-violent psychological pressure through a vigorous and extensive interrogation, with the use of stratagems, including acts of deception. However, when these do not attain their purpose, the exertion of a moderate measure of physical pressure cannot be avoided."[17]

In 1968 the International Committee for the Red Cross issued a report on Nablus Prison, one of the IDF's detention centers in the recently captured West Bank. It found:

• "Suspension of the detainee by the hands and simultaneous traction of his other members for hours at a time until he loses consciousness.

• Burns with cigarette stubs.

• Blows by rods on the genitals.

• Tying up and blindfolding for days.

• Bites by dogs.

• Electric shocks at the temples, the mouth, the chest and testicles."

The first study of interrogation techniques following the Landau Commission was published in March 1991 by the Israeli Human Rights organisation B'tselem: "The Interrogation of Palestinians during the Intifada: Ill-Treatment, Moderate Physical Pressure or Torture?"[31] Based on interviews with 41 prisoners the report concluded:

"A number of interrogation methods appear to be common, even routine in the group we interviewed. Virtually all our sample were subject to: verbal abuse, humiliation and threats of injury; sleep and food deprivation; hooding for prolonged periods; enforced standing for long periods, sometimes in an enclosed space, hands bound behind back and legs tied ("al-Shabah"); being bound in other painful ways (such as the "banana" position); prolonged periods of painful confinement in small specially constructed cells (the "closet" or "refrigerator") and severe and prolonged beatings on all parts of the body, resulting in injuries requiring medical treatment."[32]

A 1995 official report by Miriam Ben-Porat, made public in 2000, showed that Shin Bet "routinely" went beyond the "moderate physical pressure" authorised by the Landau Commission. In the report, Israel admitted for the first time that Palestinian detainees suspected of terrorism were tortured during the First Intifada, between 1988 and 1992.[33]

A 2009 report by B'Tselem into the Shin Bet interrogation facility at Petah Tikva, based on testimony from 121 Palestinians, stated that: "In the interrogation room, detainees are forced to sit bound to a rigid chair unable to move, for hours and even days, causing intense pain in some cases. The hygienic conditions are appalling: detainees are sometimes denied showers and not given a change of clothes and toilet paper. At least some cells reek and have mould. The food is of poor quality and quantity, and detainees lose weight. During interrogation, detainees are exposed to threats, including threats against family members, and sometimes to violence. Other severe means include exposing the detainees to extreme heat and cold and depriving them of sleep."[34]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landau_Commission

And I remember talking to someone with professional experience in psychiatry who told me that Eichmann looked like he was under some will-breaking drugs during his 'trial' in Jerusalem. Interesting food for thought...

Bundeswehr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 5:12 pm
I skimmed over both of the pages you linked me, and read through them. But they don't actually link the sassen tapes themselves and just barely scrape over the whole thing

Also, your evidence says that Eichmann said that there were 10.7 million dead at auchwitz, that there were Soviet submarines that gassed Jews hundreds of kilometers off of Poland's shore(s) in shitty lublin peasant house, that there were literal fountains of blood at auchwitz, that there were vein experiments, and that a German soldier had a gun up his asshole whilst shooting a Jew in a line one foot away and her surviving and also being thrown in a pit without realizing, and that cartoons were shown as "evidence".

What is logical to any of this? Theyre obviously fabricating shit, and we all know they made up the whole narrative of the holohoax and caricture regarding figures such as Josef Mengele

And, none of it explains the steep difference between the facial structures of Adolf Eichmann, his made up bullshit capture story that doesn't make sense, and what happened to him seeing Israeli contradictions.

People https://fashfront.st/threads/eichmann-l ... -did.1745/ such as this guy has gone to point it out, I'd recommend it, it's a good read

To affirm they got eichmann would to be to affirm the whole narrative of the holohoax, and the obvious nonsensical bullshit regarding his case

Bundeswehr wrote: ↑Fri Nov 21, 2025 5:29 pm Hey, could you tell me who said that about him being drugged? And anything else, please