The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Keen wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:59 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:44 pm I think you know my answers to these questions. What do you think happened to those Jews who passed through those camps?

I haven't asked you a single question yet - other than these:

You're not afraid of agreeing to the no dodging of relevant questions rule here, are you bombsaway?

You're not afraid of real debate like Nessie and Confused jew are, are you bombsaway?

Questions will come later. This is how our debate will start:

We will start this debate with bombsaway telling us all where he thinks the jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up.

Then I will ask him some questions.

Then I will tell everyone where I think they ended up.

Then he can ask me some questions.

When we get our foundation of fundamental facts built, we will then have a real debate on the issue.

Go ahead bombsaway.

You're not afraid to tell us where you think the jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up, are you?

The issue with revisionism is not that you haven't proven "resettlement" comprehensively or in its entirety, it's that you haven't evidenced a single aspect of it ... It's why I think you guys are pathological. You're not properly grappling with the enormous flaws in your belief system, which is a sign of derangement of some kind. By grappling, I mean writing about it, formalizing research and arguments.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:17 pm eh I don't hold you in high enough esteem to answer questions which I've already answered. if you donate to a charity of my choice (Gaza relief) I'll do it

We will start this debate with bombsaway telling us all where he thinks the jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up.

Then I will ask him some questions.

Then I will tell everyone where I think they ended up.

Then he can ask me some questions.

When we get our foundation of fundamental facts built, we will then have a real debate on the issue.

The issue with revisionism is not that you haven't proven "resettlement" comprehensively or in its entirety, it's that you haven't evidenced a single aspect of it . For instance, if you could point to records of food/fuel/supplies being delivered en masse to settlement zones (as exists for ghettos) this would be an aspect of it. But there's zip. There aren't even any rumors or second hand information. There's no transport records or witness testimonies that evidence the transport, again like there is to the Reinhardt camps/Chelmno/Auschwitz. Zeros across the board.

It's why I think you guys are pathological. You're not properly grappling with the enormous flaws in your belief system, which is a sign of derangement of some kind. By grappling, I mean writing about it, formalizing research and arguments.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:38 pm …the point of my quote there is that revisionists can scrutinize the other side but can't handle scrutiny of their positions.
And you are showing exactly that right now…

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 5:52 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:38 pm …the point of my quote there is that revisionists can scrutinize the other side but can't handle scrutiny of their positions.
And you are showing exactly that right now…

Wow!
No, that’s clearly not what is happening.

You made a statement.
Keen called you on it and challenged you to a genuine debate, BASED UPON the allegation of YOUR STATEMENT.
And you have run from his challenge.

You are again claiming the EXACT OPPOSITE of reality to be true.

Keen challenged YOU, in order to “scrutinise” the credibility of YOUR position.
And you ducked out immediately.

CONCLUSION: again it looks like you have psychological issues if you genuinely think anyone believes your complete reversal of what just occurred.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 6:02 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 5:52 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 4:38 pm …the point of my quote there is that revisionists can scrutinize the other side but can't handle scrutiny of their positions.
And you are showing exactly that right now…

Wow!
No, that’s clearly not what is happening.

You made a statement.
Keen called you on it and challenged you to a genuine debate BASED UPON the allegation of YOUR STATEMENT.
And you have run from his challenge.

You are again claiming the EXACT OPPOSITE of reality to be true.

Keen challenged YOU, in order to “scrutinise” the credibility of YOUR position.
And you ducked out immediately.

CONCLUSION: again it looks like you have psychological issues if you genuinely think anyone believes your complete reversal of what just occurred.

Bro the thread is apparently "on the resettlement issue" but what Keen is asking me about has nothing to do with resettlement, because obviously I don't think resettlement happened. This is why I think you guys are deranged.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:07 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 6:02 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 5:52 pm
Wow!
No, that’s clearly not what is happening.

You made a statement.
Keen called you on it and challenged you to a genuine debate BASED UPON the allegation of YOUR STATEMENT.
And you have run from his challenge.

You are again claiming the EXACT OPPOSITE of reality to be true.

Keen challenged YOU, in order to “scrutinise” the credibility of YOUR position.
And you ducked out immediately.

CONCLUSION: again it looks like you have psychological issues if you genuinely think anyone believes your complete reversal of what just occurred.

Bro the thread is apparently "on the resettlement issue" but what Keen is asking me about has nothing to do with resettlement, because obviously I don't think resettlement happened. This is why I think you guys are deranged.

Seriously?!?!?

You seriously think that?

Bro, he’s asking you to explain where YOU believe ‘they’ went.

That’s OBVIOUSLY NOT asking you to discuss “resettlement”.

You really didn’t understand that?
I’m genuinely amazed if you really couldn’t comprehend such a simple thing.

I assume Keen is anticipating you will say ‘they’ went into the ground at specific places.

And I also assume he has questions prepared for this reply from you.

If you as a long-time holocaust believer, defender and debater, genuinely did NOT understand this, then as someone interested in human psychology I suggest YOUR response above has only two explanations.
And I think these apply to ANYONE and EVERYONE who has become familiar with the actual details of the holocaust narrative yet continue to deny the blatant flaws and physical impoosibilities that form the core of its story.
The two explanations are these.
Your avoidance in order to defend the racist, anti-German, atrocity propaganda of the mass-gassing ‘holocaust’ allegation, is derived from either:
a.) limited intellectual capacity (stupid)
or
b.) devious debating tactic (dishonest).

(Both related to psychology (your preferred subject). )

It usually is a combination of both a.) and b.)
In your case, I don’t think a.) applies, so conclude it is b.).