Page 4 of 4
Re: Witness Question for Nessie
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:16 pm
by Stubble
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:06 pm
HansHill wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 3:45 pm
No wonder you are performing so terribly when your threshold for corroboration is an item in a different location to where you need it to be
Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung Inventoried to the wrong location.
viewtopic.php?t=549&sid=f48d906545d3359 ... 4d2e542e47
You either:
- Have pathetic thresholds for corroboration
- Dont understand how to read an inventory sheet
- Dishonestly invoking a deus ex machina to force a narrative
- Brazenly lying & attempting to manipulate those less familiar with the events
- All of the above
Absolute slop as always
Two eyewitnesses describe the same item, with both being specific about it being located in the gas chamber. A document also describes the same item in an inventory, but it appears to list it in a different room. But all three locate it inside the same building. The discrepancy can be simply explained as a mistake in the inventory, no need for a deus ex machina. I have lied about nothing, with quotes from both witneses and a link to the document.
You are seriously stretching credibility, claiming that there is no corroborative evidence for the columns. If the type of evidence used here, was used for something that you were happy to accept, you would declare there is corroboration. If two Jews and a document described a mesh column that was used for improved ventilation inside a Krema corpse store, you would accept that as corroborating evidence, without any problems!
Something
hand written on a typed inventory sheet detailing the one thing you want to assume is something else being in
the wrong location is not evidence that something described differently by everyone who claims to have interacted with it being placed in
a different location you fucking retard.
Holy fuck.
Re: Witness Question for Nessie
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:16 pm
by Nessie
HansHill wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:13 pm
Two people describe two different things and a third thing is somewhere else!
Corroboration!
The absolute state of Holocaust enjoyers.
Two people describe the same object and locate it in the same building as a document that is describing the same object. Corroboration.
Stop pretending that they all describe a completely different object.
Re: Witness Question for Nessie
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:18 pm
by Nessie
Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:16 pm
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:06 pm
....
Two eyewitnesses describe the same item, with both being specific about it being located in the gas chamber. A document also describes the same item in an inventory, but it appears to list it in a different room. But all three locate it inside the same building. The discrepancy can be simply explained as a mistake in the inventory, no need for a deus ex machina. I have lied about nothing, with quotes from both witneses and a link to the document.
You are seriously stretching credibility, claiming that there is no corroborative evidence for the columns. If the type of evidence used here, was used for something that you were happy to accept, you would declare there is corroboration. If two Jews and a document described a mesh column that was used for improved ventilation inside a Krema corpse store, you would accept that as corroborating evidence, without any problems!
Something
hand written on a typed inventory sheet detailing the one thing you want to assume is something else being in
the wrong location is not evidence that something described differently by everyone who claims to have interacted with it was placed in
a different location you fucking retard.
Holy fuck.
The document locates the object in the same building as the witnesses, in a room next to the one the witnesses describe. No wonder you get abusive, when that minor discrepancy is all you have to claim they all do not corroborate each other.
Re: Witness Question for Nessie
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:24 pm
by Stubble
Minor discrepancy...
Get the fuck out of here with that shit.
It is problematic as fuck.
Herr Hill is absolutely correct;
HansHill wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:13 pm
Two people describe two different things and a third thing is somewhere else!
Corroboration!
The absolute state of Holocaust enjoyers.
Re: Witness Question for Nessie
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:30 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:16 pm
Two people describe the same object and locate it in the same building as a document that is describing the same object. Corroboration.
Two unsubstantiated allegations do not confirm a thing.
When "revisionsists" continue to use the word "corroboration" they are just playing nesserto's game.
WHY???
Confirm and support are two different words.
If you mean confirm, then use the fucking word.
Re: Witness Question for Nessie
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:31 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:18 pm
No wonder you get abusive, when that minor discrepancy is all you have to claim they all do not corroborate each other.
Two unsubstantiated allegations do not confirm a thing, and they have zero evidentiary value, even if they are exactly the same.
Re: Witness Question for Nessie
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:38 pm
by Stubble
Keen wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:31 pm
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:18 pm
No wonder you get abusive, when that minor discrepancy is all you have to claim they all do not corroborate each other.
Two unsubstantiated allegations do not confirm a thing, and they have zero evidentiary value.
2 disparate allegations do not even support one another, and, a receipt for another thing assigned to another room doesn't support either unsubstantiated allegation.
If you interview 2 people and ask them what Bob had for breakfast and one says oatmeal and is very specific about the bowl, the consistency of the oatmeal and describes the spoon with a specific length, tilt and width, and the other person says he ate cereal with a spork, and gives similar specific details, and then you find a receipt for bacon and eggs, that doesn't mean that everyone corroborated each other, especially if the receipt is for a separate table.
For fucks sake.