Forensic Chemistry

For more adversarial interactions
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by ConfusedJew »

I never claim to have read it, nor do I think I even defended it. I was surveying the different opinions and arguments on here. Now that I see the big picture I'm ready to zoom into the details.

I was defending the existence of the Holocaust and the victims who were taken by it.

Do you guys ever challenge your beliefs though or do you constantly seek out information that supports your belief that the Holocaust was not real?
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 320
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

ConfusedJew wrote: Tue Jul 29, 2025 8:13 pmI was defending the existence of the Holocaust and the victims who were taken by it.
Wow!
No-one is denying the “existence” of the entirety of the ‘holocaust’ narrative, nor denying that many hundreds of thousands died as a result of it.

What a dimwit! :roll:

Even now after everything written in explanation, CJ is still defending his/her own ‘strawman’ distortion of the debate. The wilfully stubborn ignorance is astounding!
CJ appears unable to learn anything.

ConfusedJew wrote: Tue Jul 29, 2025 8:13 pm Do you guys ever challenge your beliefs…
I assume everyone here, like myself, came to this investigation, research and attempt at historical revision from the position that the compulsory narrative that we were taught as children regarding the jewish experience during WW2, was accurate IN ALL ITS DETAILS.
We have reached different conclusions regarding some of the core details PRECISELY BECAUSE we “challenged our beliefs”.
So… Ironically — yet again — it is the likes of this ConfusedJew who have proved themselves unable to do likewise.

ConfusedJew wrote: Tue Jul 29, 2025 8:13 pm …do you constantly seek out information that supports your belief that the Holocaust was not real?
Nobody here is arguing that ‘the holocaust was not real’.
What a doofus! :roll:

And what a waste of time explaining anything to this stubbornly self-deluded person.

Image
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 1994
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Stubble »

ConfusedJew wrote: Tue Jul 29, 2025 8:13 pm I never claim to have read it, nor do I think I even defended it. I was surveying the different opinions and arguments on here. Now that I see the big picture I'm ready to zoom into the details.

I was defending the existence of the Holocaust and the victims who were taken by it.

Do you guys ever challenge your beliefs though or do you constantly seek out information that supports your belief that the Holocaust was not real?


You can't seriously be this disconnected from your posts. If you are, every day for you must be like a scene from 'Groundhog Day', but, without any ability to recall the reason for the feeling of deja vu.

After 23 pages, nothing has been learned on your end. Nothing ventured. Nothing gained.

If your last post is accurate, then, literally, all you have done is relay copypasta from ChatGPT without even once engaging your brain.

I'd say that kind of dumb regurgitation was fascinating if it wasn't simply so repulsive.

You have wasted everyone's time, and you unironically intend to continue to do so.

It is mindboggling.

I gently recommend from the admins some kind of censure for this. Some kind of responsibility, some punishment, some recourse.

I'm appalled.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by ConfusedJew »

I'm going to make another thread for the 1994 Markiewicz report and then we can circle back here for the general chemistry questions. I'm surveyed nearly all of the arguments for the chemistry side of things and I'm ready to really debate this out.

You guys are obsessed with no not knowing about "holocaust revisionism" but to me this is like arguing with somebody with an exotic religion that their religion is the true religion and you are stupid for not knowing anything about it.
Online
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 888
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by HansHill »

Confused Jew is on my "ignore" list but I saw he posted here while I was lurking.

Confused Jew: You have unreservedly embarrassed yourself in this thread. Asking on page 23 for us to "begin" discussing this with you, after us begging you to pay attention for 23 pages, is both hilarious and tone deaf. You have demonstrated you are not competent in discussing these ideas, and given your approach, it's looking unlikely you ever will be. If I even trusted that you read the Markiewicz Study (which I don't) I would advise you to start your "circle back" by reading this thread you started.

Or better yet, start your "circle back" by reading any of the material that has been posted here. Should you spend lets say, 6 months studying the material and become somewhat familiar with it, I might engage again, who knows. Until that day, and that is to say if you survive a mod ban, you'll be completely on your own.

:roll:
User avatar
Cowboy
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 9:30 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Cowboy »

ConfusedJew wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm I'm surveyed nearly all of the arguments for the chemistry side of things and I'm ready to really debate this out.

You guys are obsessed with no not knowing about "holocaust revisionism" but to me this is like arguing with somebody with an exotic religion that their religion is the true religion and you are stupid for not knowing anything about it.
This is unbelievable! :lol:
I'm astonished
...First, they would count on the stupidity of their adversaries, and then, if there was no way out, they pretended to be stupid themselves. If all else failed, they claimed they did not understand, or, being challenged, they would instantly jump to another subject and talk about obvious truths. If these were agreed on, they immediately applied them to entirely different matters. When they were caught off guard, they would avoid the conversation and claim they had no knowledge or understanding of the issue. No matter where you seized one of these apostles, your hand grasped slimy ooze, which spurted through your fingers, only to unite again the next moment. If your argument really gave a man a shattering defeat in front of others, he could do nothing but agree. You might suppose that this was one step forward, but how surprised you would be the following day! The next morning you will find that Jew has not even the slightest memory of yesterday and continues to repeat his old mischievous nonsense as if nothing at all had happened. When pressed about the previous conversation, he would pretend astonishment and could remember nothing at all except the truth of his statements, which he felt had been proven the day before. Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
Has this quote ever been more relevant?
Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 320
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

ConfusedJew wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm I'm surveyed nearly all of the arguments for the chemistry side of things…
Incoherent, arrogant AND not credible.

ConfusedJew wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm …and I'm ready to really debate this out.
Really? :roll: [yawn]

ConfusedJew wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm You guys are obsessed with no not knowing about "holocaust revisionism"…
More incoherent nonsense.
Reality: CJ doesn’t yet know the details of the narrative of his own jewish, secular ‘holocaust’ religion.

ConfusedJew wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm…to me this is like arguing with somebody with an exotic religion that their religion is the true religion and you are stupid for not knowing anything about it.
ConfusedJew joined the CODOH forum on the 1st of May 2025.
I think it is fair to conclude that after three months she/he must be stupid for “not knowing anything about” her/his own belief-system. For what other explanation is there for STILL being so ignorant, after all the many explanations, quotes, links, photos, maps, diagrams and charts provided to her/him?

CJ has been posting dishonest drivel and arguing in bad faith, without ever really engaging in genuine discussion for three months.
In that time he/she has:
— learnt nothing about the many core physical impossibilities from a chemistry perspective of the ‘holocaust’ mass-gassing narrative,
— taken offence with almost everyone,
— given almost everyone but HansHill a ‘last chance’ to discuss on his/her pompous terms,
— put almost everyone but HansHill on ignore after they failed their ‘last chance’,
— confirmed precisely what Adolf Hitler observed in Vienna in the 1910s, about how Ashkenazis deceitfully discuss,
— alienated (it seems) almost everyone here with his/her deceitful and pompous posing of being in genuine discussion,
— and lastly, still misrepresents what historical revision of the WW2 narrative concerning European jewry is ACTUALLY about!
Cowboy wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 6:11 pm This is unbelievable! :lol:
I'm astonished.
...First, they would count on the stupidity of their adversaries, and then, if there was no way out, they pretended to be stupid themselves.
If all else failed, they claimed they did not understand, or, being challenged, they would instantly jump to another subject and talk about obvious truths.
If these were agreed on, they immediately applied them to entirely different matters.
When they were caught off guard, they would avoid the conversation and claim they had no knowledge or understanding of the issue.
No matter where you seized one of these apostles, your hand grasped slimy ooze, which spurted through your fingers, only to unite again the next moment.
If your argument really gave a man a shattering defeat in front of others, he could do nothing but agree. You might suppose that this was one step forward, but how surprised you would be the following day! The next morning you will find that Jew has not even the slightest memory of yesterday and continues to repeat his old mischievous nonsense as if nothing at all had happened.
When pressed about the previous conversation, he would pretend astonishment and could remember nothing at all except the truth of his statements, which he felt had been proven the day before. Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
Has this quote ever been more relevant?
No, in my experience it has never been more relevant. That describes CJ’s behaviour with remarkable accuracy, even after over one hundred years.
Fascinating isn’t it.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Callafangers »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:30 pm
Cowboy wrote: Wed Jul 30, 2025 6:11 pm This is unbelievable! :lol:
I'm astonished.
...First, they would count on the stupidity of their adversaries, and then, if there was no way out, they pretended to be stupid themselves.
If all else failed, they claimed they did not understand, or, being challenged, they would instantly jump to another subject and talk about obvious truths.
If these were agreed on, they immediately applied them to entirely different matters.
When they were caught off guard, they would avoid the conversation and claim they had no knowledge or understanding of the issue.
No matter where you seized one of these apostles, your hand grasped slimy ooze, which spurted through your fingers, only to unite again the next moment.
If your argument really gave a man a shattering defeat in front of others, he could do nothing but agree. You might suppose that this was one step forward, but how surprised you would be the following day! The next morning you will find that Jew has not even the slightest memory of yesterday and continues to repeat his old mischievous nonsense as if nothing at all had happened.
When pressed about the previous conversation, he would pretend astonishment and could remember nothing at all except the truth of his statements, which he felt had been proven the day before. Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
Has this quote ever been more relevant?
No, in my experience it has never been more relevant. That describes CJ’s behaviour with remarkable accuracy, even after over one hundred years.
Fascinating isn’t it.
I'm quite grateful to CJ for his efforts here. I originally pointed out bombsaway (who I still suspect is Jewish, based on his initial forum interactions) engaging in similar tactics at the old CODOH forum a couple years ago and I think there were some skeptics at the time, at least at first, to what I was accusing him of. I mean, who would dedicate hours, days, weeks and months to spin webs, split hairs, and all-around engage in a topic dishonestly, day after day? That's such an "antisemitic trope" to state toward an [ostensibly] Jewish person that it just can't be true... right?

But with CJ, I feel exonerated by it all. If there was any doubt about bombsaway and his behavior, CJ has come in to prove beyond any shadow of doubt that Jewish individuals who act this way are indeed out there, and they end up on this very forum.

Thank you, CJ. Great job. :)
To those who still believe it: grow up. To those lying about it consciously: may you burn in hell.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 1994
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Stubble »

One of the most striking things to me, is the fractalness of the quote. It has applied many time in the thread, example;
Stubble wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 6:03 pm ...
As noted, the quote has applied for at least 100 years. The great man who wrote it down noticed it and recorded it for us. I wouldn't be surprised to find this behavior remarked upon again in history prior to the tract we quote here.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by bombsaway »

Callafangers wrote: Thu Jul 31, 2025 12:14 am
I'm quite grateful to CJ for his efforts here. I originally pointed out bombsaway (who I still suspect is Jewish, based on his initial forum interactions) engaging in similar tactics at the old CODOH forum a couple years ago and I think there were some skeptics at the time, at least at first, to what I was accusing him of. I mean, who would dedicate hours, days, weeks and months to spin webs, split hairs, and all-around engage in a topic dishonestly, day after day? That's such an "antisemitic trope" to state toward an [ostensibly] Jewish person that it just can't be true... right?

But with CJ, I feel exonerated by it all. If there was any doubt about bombsaway and his behavior, CJ has come in to prove beyond any shadow of doubt that Jewish individuals who act this way are indeed out there, and they end up on this very forum.

Thank you, CJ. Great job. :)
Get over yourself. I tortured you a little, like you guys are trying to torture CJ, but it was in the name of science. I used to talk to people who believed the Dems stole the 2020 election, so it's a broader interest of mine - delusional people.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Callafangers »

bombsaway wrote: Thu Jul 31, 2025 5:32 am
Callafangers wrote: Thu Jul 31, 2025 12:14 am
I'm quite grateful to CJ for his efforts here. I originally pointed out bombsaway (who I still suspect is Jewish, based on his initial forum interactions) engaging in similar tactics at the old CODOH forum a couple years ago and I think there were some skeptics at the time, at least at first, to what I was accusing him of. I mean, who would dedicate hours, days, weeks and months to spin webs, split hairs, and all-around engage in a topic dishonestly, day after day? That's such an "antisemitic trope" to state toward an [ostensibly] Jewish person that it just can't be true... right?

But with CJ, I feel exonerated by it all. If there was any doubt about bombsaway and his behavior, CJ has come in to prove beyond any shadow of doubt that Jewish individuals who act this way are indeed out there, and they end up on this very forum.

Thank you, CJ. Great job. :)
Get over yourself. I tortured you a little, like you guys are trying to torture CJ, but it was in the name of science. I used to talk to people who believed the Dems stole the 2020 election, so it's a broader interest of mine - delusional people.
You pilpul'd your way through 20+ pages on a thread (more than once), refusing to concede what was blatantly obvious, even after the evidence continued mounting against you. You've toned it down in recent months but it was almost identical to what CJ does, minus the non-stop, shameless ChatGPT-ing.

You should consider taking this troubled fella' (CJ) under your wing. Dude needs a mentor.
To those who still believe it: grow up. To those lying about it consciously: may you burn in hell.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 320
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

Stubble wrote: Thu Jul 31, 2025 1:05 am One of the most striking things to me, is the fractalness of the quote. It has applied many time in the thread, example;
Stubble wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 6:03 pm ...
As noted, the quote has applied for at least 100 years. The great man who wrote it down noticed it and recorded it for us. I wouldn't be surprised to find this behavior remarked upon again in history prior to the tract we quote here.
Thanks to you Herr Stubble for bringing my attention to that fascinatingly accurate observation by Adolf. I have never read more than a tiny part of ‘Mein kampf’ so wouldn’t have known of this had you not quoted it here.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 320
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

bombsaway wrote: Thu Jul 31, 2025 5:32 am
Callafangers wrote: Thu Jul 31, 2025 12:14 am
I'm quite grateful to CJ for his efforts here. I originally pointed out bombsaway (who I still suspect is Jewish, based on his initial forum interactions) engaging in similar tactics at the old CODOH forum a couple years ago and I think there were some skeptics at the time, at least at first, to what I was accusing him of. I mean, who would dedicate hours, days, weeks and months to spin webs, split hairs, and all-around engage in a topic dishonestly, day after day? That's such an "antisemitic trope" to state toward an [ostensibly] Jewish person that it just can't be true... right?

But with CJ, I feel exonerated by it all. If there was any doubt about bombsaway and his behavior, CJ has come in to prove beyond any shadow of doubt that Jewish individuals who act this way are indeed out there, and they end up on this very forum.

Thank you, CJ. Great job. :)
…I tortured you a little, like you guys are trying to torture CJ, but it was in the name of science.
More deceitfulness. And psychological projection.
No revisionist is “torturing” CJ.
By admitting that YOU yourself have done that in the past, you have merely inadvertently revealed your own lack of good-faith in discussion.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by ConfusedJew »

I want to note that you guys have unfortunately totally derailed this thread at this point and then you try to blame me for making it so long. Very rich...

Seriously, take a look at the total number of posts on this most recent page, look back at my posts where I am trying to move the conversation forward and clarifying issues, while you guys didn't add anything of substance to this.

I have very low expectations from a Holocaust denial forum but I want to get to the bottom of this as quickly as possible and it's like pulling teeth from some of you.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 1994
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Stubble »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Thu Jul 31, 2025 6:48 am ...
Read it. Cover to cover.

were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Post Reply