The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 11:52 pmThanks EoZ!

You're welcome, Stub.

Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 9:57 pm

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 5:07 pm I'm reminded no one has posted this yet. Seems pertinent.

This one, made by the same guy, seems even more on topic. And much shorter.

Both videos are good for newbies.
That said and since we are talking about AI, I consider how to make a video on the subject on the Buchenwald shrunken heads using AI. Lots of AI does however blockout Holocaust Revisionism.

Hektor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 4:58 am That said and since we are talking about AI, I consider how to make a video on the subject on the Buchenwald shrunken heads using AI. Lots of AI does however blockout Holocaust Revisionism.

Perhaps you could try to fool AI with some veiled revisionism by suggesting to it that the alleged Nazi shrunken heads conveniently vanished and were never scientifically analyzed and that the making of such shrunken heads would have been impossible without the secret decoction of Amazonian plants and complicated process used by Jivaro master head-shrinkers for that purpose.

Found this image and asked Grok if it was a genuine shrunken head from Buchenwald


It replied

The specific shrunken head in your image (the one presented as Exhibit USA-254 by prosecutor Thomas J. Dodd at the Nuremberg trials on December 13, 1945) has not been proven fake. https://x.com/i/grok/share/24a5b1718930 ... aaa41fd08f

Searching for shrunken heads, I came upon this image from 1938, just thought it seemed a bit similar to these so called Buchenwald heads?


Then I asked google ai if it knew where this head was from(I cropped just the head), it stated it was the head of Domingo Escurra, some man with a rare skin disease. So too did Grok, it said the same thing. I asked both if it could be a jivaro shrunken head, they were both adamant it was Domingo Escurra. Then I shared the 1938 article, they would not have it.
I said it looked similar to the other 2 images(both supposedly Buchenwald heads), Grok would not have it.


https://x.com/i/grok/share/77fa183bf007 ... e2f783f081

Anyway, sorry to derail the thread, just thought that 1938 head seemed similar?

slob wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 2:43 pm Anyway, sorry to derail the thread, just thought that 1938 head seemed similar?

They're not the same head, if that's what you're suggesting. If you compare to frontal photos of the Nuremberg head (like this one) you can see that the 1938 head's nose is much bigger, the eyebrows much bushier, and it's missing the prominent diagonal lines on the skin beneath the eyes.

But they do bear a visual similarity, as if they could have come from the same source.

Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 7:27 am

Hektor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 4:58 am That said and since we are talking about AI, I consider how to make a video on the subject on the Buchenwald shrunken heads using AI. Lots of AI does however blockout Holocaust Revisionism.

Perhaps you could try to fool AI with some veiled revisionism by suggesting to it that the alleged Nazi shrunken heads conveniently vanished and were never scientifically analyzed and that the making of such shrunken heads would have been impossible without the secret decoction of Amazonian plants and complicated process used by Jivaro master head-shrinkers for that purpose.
....

One sometimes can get results with being over the top pushy with Holocaust Claims.

I did get Grok so far to call Holocaustianity a religion and I'll try to use the results on video/podcast creation platform to distribute it later.

slob wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 2:43 pm Found this image and asked Grok if it was a genuine shrunken head from Buchenwald


It replied

The specific shrunken head in your image (the one presented as Exhibit USA-254 by prosecutor Thomas J. Dodd at the Nuremberg trials on December 13, 1945) has not been proven fake. https://x.com/i/grok/share/24a5b1718930 ... aaa41fd08f

Best summary of the Holohoaxers' evidentiary standards!
In the surreal world of Holocaustianity, "has not been proven fake" = "undoubtedly true & undeniably proof of Nazi barbarity"...

Hektor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 5:21 pm

Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 7:27 am

Hektor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 4:58 am That said and since we are talking about AI, I consider how to make a video on the subject on the Buchenwald shrunken heads using AI. Lots of AI does however blockout Holocaust Revisionism.

Perhaps you could try to fool AI with some veiled revisionism by suggesting to it that the alleged Nazi shrunken heads conveniently vanished and were never scientifically analyzed and that the making of such shrunken heads would have been impossible without the secret decoction of Amazonian plants and complicated process used by Jivaro master head-shrinkers for that purpose.
....

One sometimes can get results with being over the top pushy with Holocaust Claims.

I did get Grok so far to call Holocaustianity a religion and I'll try to use the results on video/podcast creation platform to distribute it later.

I've also noticed this with over-the-top Holohoax claims.

Sounds great. Hope you'll share your video with us.

Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 7:27 am

Hektor wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 4:58 am That said and since we are talking about AI, I consider how to make a video on the subject on the Buchenwald shrunken heads using AI. Lots of AI does however blockout Holocaust Revisionism.

Perhaps you could try to fool AI with some veiled revisionism by suggesting to it that the alleged Nazi shrunken heads conveniently vanished and were never scientifically analyzed

It now turns out that the Buchenwald shrunken heads didn't vanish at all and could have been scientifically analyzed (but why weren't they?).


https://www.buchenwald.de/en/geschichte ... falsifikat