The CODOH Revisionist Forum

A presentation from Dr David Duke regarding jewish facilitation of weaponized migration.



Dr David Duke on 'The jewish Question'.

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 7:46 pm A presentation from Dr David Duke regarding jewish facilitation of weaponized migration.

Dr David Duke on 'The jewish Question'.

I get that Duke's interest is in defending white people and nations but I hope people of all races/ethnic backgrounds can see the problem of subversive networks so driven toward (and capable of) shifting the demographics of entire nations in ways that are intended to engineer more compliant (enslaved) societies. This is disgusting behavior, and dangerous for all people and nations, any way you flip it. People that participate in such subversive actions (even through complacency) lack empathy and cannot be trusted in any kind of transaction.

Did you watch the videos?

I think you may have a misconception about Dr David Duke.

He talks about true nationalism and true diversity in there at around the 21 minute mark of the second video.

Nations for all peoples, free and sovereign.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:04 pm

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 7:46 pm A presentation from Dr David Duke regarding jewish facilitation of weaponized migration.

Dr David Duke on 'The jewish Question'.

I get that Duke's interest is in defending white people and nations but I hope people of all races/ethnic backgrounds can see the problem of subversive networks so driven toward (and capable of) shifting the demographics of entire nations in ways that are intended to engineer more compliant (enslaved) societies. This is disgusting behavior, and dangerous for all people and nations, any way you flip it. People that participate in such subversive actions (even through complacency) lack empathy and cannot be trusted in any kind of transaction.

I think the issue is the stuff in underline has no evidence, nor is there any evidence that the point of bringing in eg refugees is to "shift the demographics" - rather the evidence is it is done for humanitarian. Even increasing diversity and multi culturalism, which is rare argument for immigration, is seen as a positive thing, not a means of control. Politically there are entities that want open borders (mostly libertarians like the Kochs and politicians looking to cement power or shore up future bases). What you're saying is possible, but just like resettlement of millions, a totally speculative reality with no justification other than "it makes sense to me" .

Well by golly gee, it looks like white papers about stated aims of demographic replacement get 404'd.

That makes me a conspiracy theorist!

https://www.un.org/esa/population/publi ... ration.htm



I love how the advice to people looking for that paper is to 'fly back home'...

Gee, I wish they would...

Direct pdf link is still up though;

https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/ ... ration.pdf

So far as the intention being a 'New European Man', you're going to look at what I quote, call it selective, scream context and lean on what others have written about the author saying that that proves a dumbed down compliant population isn't the aim...



Some George Carlin for flavor

bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 10:03 pm I think the issue is the stuff in underline has no evidence, nor is there any evidence that the point of bringing in eg refugees is to "shift the demographics" - rather the evidence is it is done for humanitarian. Even increasing diversity and multi culturalism, which is rare argument for immigration, is seen as a positive thing, not a means of control. Politically there are entities that want open borders (mostly libertarians like the Kochs and politicians looking to cement power or shore up future bases). What you're saying is possible, but just like resettlement of millions, a totally speculative reality with no justification other than "it makes sense to me" .

Let's agree it is happening before we delve into the "why". If it is happening, then it isn't by any mere circumstance nor coincidence, as no such conditions are sufficient to explain it. It is therefore motivated, so one has to question what exactly these motivations are. Fortunately, Judaism isn't a 100% secretive cult -- we can see what their common ideological strain(s) are (at least in general or by consensus), given these are published and discussed (sometimes openly) by rabbinical authorities, and based in the Talmud. There are numerous admissions of exactly that, e.g.:



Many of those featured in the above compilation are esteemed rabbis with many followers, often reiterating what has already been said and followed for centuries, frequently derived from figures like the revered 'Rambam' (Maimonides).

There is no question that what Jewish organizations are doing today (and for recent decades) aligns ideologically, 100% with what Jews have 'predicted' all along. Their terrible 'prophecy' is, however, entirely self-fulfilled through subversive organizing.

We can of course play the 'not all Jews' card which is somewhat valid, however a collective is measured by its general consensus which is also reflected by how it does or does not organize (again, the example of numerous powerful/wealthy pro-refugee Jewish organizations in the West, and virtually zero anti-refugee Jewish organizations here; with the exact inverse being true in Israel).

Nessie wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 6:32 am

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:55 pm

Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:03 pm I am not under attack from Jews. They have had no influence over me, my life choices, my wealth, occupation, family, where I live or friends. I come from one of the most powerful and influential countries in the world, which is Christian in its history and heritage. Jewish influence is minimal.

You do understand this is an exemplary fallacy, correct? The fact that it is still possible to make wages and have a family and friends does not challenge in the slightest the notion that your nation's key institutions and policies are being subverted. And the key concern regarding Jewish influences is that they are (1) vastly disproportionate, and (2) aligned toward ideological objectives that are evidently at odds with the best interests of the national bloodlines. You can say the UK is still Christian in its history and heritage but this is less so than has ever been the case for the last millenia, given many major cities now increasingly overrun by foreign occupants (often Muslim, carried in via Jewish organizational initiatives and global activism).

---

While the question of Jewish subversive activities is an important one which I think should be discussed rather frankly, it must be emphasized that Jews are not the only group engaged in such activities. Even the NSDAP recognized this, given their stance toward freemasonry, certain Catholic groups, and their application of the concept of 'subhuman' as potentially applicable even to full-blooded Germans. People of poor character (e.g. subject to bribes) or depraved and ambitious ideology exist in many forms, all of which must be understood and guarded against.

The CIA was not fully Jewish, the Allied governments and institutions poisoning the public consciousness during and post WW2 were also not entirely Jewish. Communists are often non-Jewish. Many people participated in subversive campaigns for any number of reasons. I do not mean to portray subversion as an exclusively-Jewish practice... That said, it is when mentioning the Jewish element that the greatest (and most disproportionate) amount of resistance and retaliation is observed. Pointing out communist/freemasonic/etc subversion is generally allowable in any social or even professional setting... but so much as hinting at the notion of Jewish subversion is punished terribly, almost everywhere. This alone warrants special attention to the Jewish element, counteracting the systemic resistance.

The Christian UK, with its aristocracy, upper class, wealthy, connected, powerful institutions, many of which have been in place for many centuries, is not at risk from its Jewish citizens. You are an anti-Semite, who grossly exaggerates Jewish influence. Remember, the UK has no denial laws.

Let's examine the claim you make that Jewish influence is "grossly exaggerated". I'll lay out a recent set of developments that are currently happening in the United States.

First, we need to go back to October 7th, 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel (context: https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=10277#p10277). This is the catalyst date for when public opinion on Israel and Jews started to change. When Israel started leveling Gaza off of the map, killing civilians, and pursued territorial expansion, people thought it was justified at first because of what had happened on October 7th. One of the main reasons for this sentiment was because mainstream media is primarily owned by Jews, so pro-Israel messaging was heavily pushed. Social media is always under pressure from the ADL to censor people who talk negatively about Israel, but especially Jews as a group. There was one major exception to this though.

For the longest time, TikTok was owned by ByteDance, a Chinese tech company. Since Jews aren't very influential in Chinese society, they don't have a lot of stake in ByteDance. This being said, the ascension of anti-Israel sentiment on TikTok skyrocketed once the War in Gaza kicked off. To be more specific, pro-Palestine content was making its way to the front of the algorithm and had very positive reactions from the userbase. This was a huge problem for Israel and their Hasbara machine that has been working damn near flawlessly for decades.

Ever since then, there was a massive push by GOP lawmakers to pass legislation to ban TikTok because of "Chinese spies". This type of rhetoric was going on before, but it escalated post-October 7th. I'll let Nikki Haley describe the real reason:


The head of the Republican Jewish Coalition came out and said that Israel is "losing the digital war" on places such as TikTok. He then mentions how Jews are at the top of various social media companies and that they should do their best to reverse the trend and ensure that Americans have a favorable view of Israel.


But wait, it gets even better!

In late 2023/early 2024, Jewish groups, specifically the ADL, were keeping track and measuring how much anti-Israel content there was on TikTok and how it was affecting the userbase. These reports were then delivered to GOP members in congress, who are all pro-Israel people influenced by groups such as AIPAC and the Republican Jewish Committee. Using these reports from the ADL, they put together a bill in congress saying that if TikTok is not sold to a US company, then TikTok will be banned in America.

One year later, Donald Trump gets elected backed by hundreds of millions of dollars of pro-Israel money from Jewish and Zionist donors. One of his priorities is to negotiate the sale of TikTok to a US company. One week ago, he announces the completed sale of TikTok to a US company and proudly announces that he had "saved" TikTok. Which US company will be heavily involved in the purchasing of the platform? Oracle. Who owns Oracle and was named by Trump as being a big part of the transaction? Larry Ellison.

Larry Ellison is the single biggest individual donor to the Israeli Defense Forces and personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu. Ellison is Jewish, but he was born in America. But why hasn't he donated a vast sum of money to the American military and pro-America causes? It's obviously because he is Jewish and his primary loyalty lies with the Jewish State of Israel. This is how it works. When push comes to shove, Jews will always put their host country behind Israel and the Jewish people.

The next day, Netanyahu holds a meeting with a bunch of Jews and other pro-Israel influencers to talk about the information war that is going on. Here's what he had to say:


He couldn't be more ecstatic that his best friend is purchasing the platform that harbors the most pro-Palestine content. If you think that this isn't a big deal that this happened, remember that TikTok has over 1.5 billion users. When a Zionist Jew takes ownership of the platform, the algorithm will change and become more pro-Israel. Algorithms aren't random posts that pop up on your screen randomly. They are put in front of you in order to have an influence on you.

Quick recap/TLDR. After October 7th, TikTok sees a massive spike in pro-Palestine content and negative opinions about Israel become more popular. Jewish groups such as the ADL wield a lot of power in the American political system, and they used that power to lobby already pro-Israel members of congress to push a bill to ban TikTok if it is not sold to an American company. When Trump gets into office, he does the wishes of the Jewish groups and sells TikTok to an 'American' company. The company is owned by Larry Ellison, who is a Jew, friend of Netanyahu, and is the single largest private donor to the IDF. Because of this, pro-Israel content will be promoted, and anti-Israel content will be censored and shadow banned. TikTok has users all across the world, so this will have a profound effect on the social media landscape.

This storyline is an excellent example of how Jews use their power in our political systems to create change that benefits Jews and Israel. Of course, this is hidden behind a veil, because if you just read headlines from mainstream news, you wouldn't know any of this information. They operate hiding in plain sight to benefit THEIR people because that is ALL that matters to them. They cannot allow Americans, specifically YOUNG Americans, to have a negative view of Israel. If a negative view becomes the norm among young people, then in the future America will no longer support Israel and they will have to face the Islamic forces in the middle east alone. Israel cannot survive without the backing of the United States. Their right to exist is only guaranteed by military aid and protection from the United States. This is why it is important for Jews to wield and use their power in our political system, because if they didn't, their country would be screwed.

Oh, and the cherry on top:


Yet you claim that we are exaggerating Jewish influence in the West. You are shameful.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:19 pm Let's agree it is happening before we delve into the "why". If it is happening, then it isn't by any mere circumstance nor coincidence, as no such conditions are sufficient to explain it.

Demographic change? There are a bunch of reasons for why it's happening. Your reason is an entirely speculative one. A random Rabbi saying something does not mean this is representative of elite policy.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:51 pm

Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:19 pm Let's agree it is happening before we delve into the "why". If it is happening, then it isn't by any mere circumstance nor coincidence, as no such conditions are sufficient to explain it.

Demographic change? There are a bunch of reasons for why it's happening. Your reason is an entirely speculative one.

That's a fallacy. We can trace the activism and initiatives (and funding) which led to the present conditions. Do you care to list other pro-refugee organizations totally free of Jewish funding, influence, or involvement? I posed the same challenge to Nessie. Will you step up?

Political organizing and activism is effective, otherwise people would not be investing in it. Jewish organizations are taking the lead when it comes to refugees into Western nations (while also doing the opposite for Israel). This is not 'demographic change' anymore than me killing your dog is 'animal control'.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:59 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:51 pm

Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:19 pm Let's agree it is happening before we delve into the "why". If it is happening, then it isn't by any mere circumstance nor coincidence, as no such conditions are sufficient to explain it.

Demographic change? There are a bunch of reasons for why it's happening. Your reason is an entirely speculative one.

That's a fallacy. We can trace the activism and initiatives (and funding) which led to the present conditions. Do you care to list other pro-refugee organizations totally free of Jewish funding, influence, or involvement? I posed the same challenge to Nessie. Will you step up?

Political organizing and activism is effective, otherwise people would not be investing in it. Jewish organizations are taking the lead when it comes to refugees into Western nations (while also doing the opposite for Israel). This is not 'demographic change' anymore than me killing your dog is 'animal control'.

The fallacy is your notion that Jews funding pro refugee organizations could only happen for one reason. That one reason is not evidenced, the others are lol. This is where the conspiratorial/speculative logic is really necessary.

Cowboy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:37 pm [...]

EXCELLENT post Sir. Well done!

bombsaway wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:07 am The fallacy is your notion that Jews funding pro refugee organizations could only happen for one reason. That one reason is not evidenced, the others are lol. This is where the conspiratorial/speculative logic is really necessary.

You're stating the exact opposite of what is true, here, then adding an 'lol' to the end of it to feign confidence. Typical bombsaway.

I've provided you the evidence that Jewish organizational strength is collectively aligned in one clear direction, regarding refugees brought into the West. Follow the money, follow the networks -- any way you cut it, it's there. These same organizations do not operate in Israel, nor do comparable organizations (pro-refugee) exist there. This is confirmation against your view that some Jewish cultural element supports refugees into more well-off nations out of some religious or ideological doctrine of benevolence.

You provide no other explanation that holds water and so all you have is your bare insistence that I've made an assumption or jumped to some conclusion. Yet despite your deflection, it remains clear that the only rational interpretation of the evidence is the one I have outlined here and which others have supported.

Without the 'Holocaust' as a constant shield, it's likely most people would have already heard these same arguments and accepted them many years ago.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:07 am

Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:59 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:51 pm
Demographic change? There are a bunch of reasons for why it's happening. Your reason is an entirely speculative one.

That's a fallacy. We can trace the activism and initiatives (and funding) which led to the present conditions. Do you care to list other pro-refugee organizations totally free of Jewish funding, influence, or involvement? I posed the same challenge to Nessie. Will you step up?

Political organizing and activism is effective, otherwise people would not be investing in it. Jewish organizations are taking the lead when it comes to refugees into Western nations (while also doing the opposite for Israel). This is not 'demographic change' anymore than me killing your dog is 'animal control'.

The fallacy is your notion that Jews funding pro refugee organizations could only happen for one reason. That one reason is not evidenced, the others are lol. This is where the conspiratorial/speculative logic is really necessary.

When Jews came to America in droves in the late 19th century/early 20th century, they were afraid of being persecuted again as they had been throughout history. Jews are a distinct people with their own genetics, behaviors, religion, etc. They are different from Europeans, who are mostly Christian. Since Jews are different, they were unwelcome in European societies because they behaved differently and were viewed as a net negative to European societies. Whether you think that their persecution was justifiable or not isn't relevant, because it happened.

In order to combat this in America (a White, European, Christian country), they promoted very liberal attitudes on immigration. The thought process was that if more people of different backgrounds came over to America, America would become more diverse and become an "open society". If everybody was welcome into America, then it would be taboo to persecute one group of people.

The most demonstratable evidence that this was the attitude amongst Jews was the creation of the play called "The Melting Pot" by Israel Zangwill, a Jew who immigrated from Europe. If you're not familiar, we are taught that America is a "melting pot" from a young age in elementary school. This teaching stems directly from this play. This is grounded into our brains, and having an opposing view, for instance the belief that America is a White country, is seen as a "Nazi" or "KKK" idea. America went from being 90%+ White to being about 60% White (and declining, will be a minority in the 2040s, possibly earlier) because of the attitudes on immigration that Jews brought with them. Of course it isn't the sole reason, but it's definitely the most influential factor.

The influence that Jews have had on immigration in this country ever since they got here has expanded into Europe post-WWII thanks to the Holocaust narrative. That narrative is also part of the reason that Western countries having an open society where everybody is welcome is the only acceptable view to have. This is very beneficial for Jews, not only because they won't get persecuted, but because they are able to ascend to the highest points in society to acquire power and influence without being scrutinized for it.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:37 am

bombsaway wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:07 am The fallacy is your notion that Jews funding pro refugee organizations could only happen for one reason. That one reason is not evidenced, the others are lol. This is where the conspiratorial/speculative logic is really necessary.

You're stating the exact opposite of what is true, here, then adding an 'lol' to the end of it to feign confidence. Typical bombsaway.

I've provided you the evidence that Jewish organizational strength is collectively aligned in one clear direction, regarding refugees brought into the West. Follow the money, follow the networks -- any way you cut it, it's there. These same organizations do not operate in Israel, nor do comparable organizations (pro-refugee) exist there. This is confirmation against your view that some Jewish cultural element supports refugees into more well-off nations out of some religious or ideological doctrine of benevolence.

You provide no other explanation that holds water and so all you have is your bare insistence that I've made an assumption or jumped to some conclusion. Yet despite your deflection, it remains clear that the only rational interpretation of the evidence is the one I have outlined here and which others have supported.

Without the 'Holocaust' as a constant shield, it's likely most people would have already heard these same arguments and accepted them many years ago.

The devil is in the details yes.

https://chatgpt.com/share/68df24d3-2fd0 ... 6fa8807150

So is this a fair question to ask? Is it fair for us to look at these agencies? 6/10 are explicitly Christian, if we look through this, will we find strong evidence of intent "to engineer more compliant (enslaved) societies" - your term

DENIERBUD 2025: The Holocaust Myth is Used to Justify Demographic Replacement