The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:29 pm Why any holyH true-believer who is discussing in good faith even needs to be anonymous beats me. That alone does rather prove they are NOT arguing in good faith.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:29 pm Why any holyH true-believer who is discussing in good faith even needs to be anonymous beats me. That alone does rather prove they are NOT arguing in good faith.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm There is great personal risk for most revisionists in using their real names

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm whereas there is near-zero risk (and possibly some praise or incentives) for exterminationists.

HansHill wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm Last thing I will post in this stupid thread before noping out: I don't necessarily think Keen or any regular poster here, on either side, is a Fed or state actor. I do however believe forums like this are monitored by intelligence and state agencies, if not by actual people then at least by bots and / or AI tools.

For this reason alone, even were "Holocaust Denial" perfectly legal in your jurisdiction, and you were a credentialed chemical engineer in a related field (hi!), coming to the attention of these actors is not something you wish to invite onto your self in any capacity, accidentally and certainly not by intention. Please do not listen to what the OP has suggested here or be tempted by it for stupid reasons.

Look at what happened to Mr Rudolf during his most recent time in prison. You do not want a swarm of African gentlemen knowing details about you or your identity, despite someone called "Keen" calling you a cahoonie on a forum.

I also invite the admin team to lock future doxing attempts, lest someone be stupid enough to be persuaded.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm This proposal of yours/Keen's could lead eventually to a subforum that has lots of members on the exterminationist side and few revisionist takers

HansHill wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 8:21 pm Why doesn't Nick Gerdes start a super serious facts and logic thread for himself and Dr Terry to spit facts and logic under their legal names?

I don't think you need Archie to set up an entire sub forum for it?

Keen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 13, 2025 12:08 am

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm This proposal of yours/Keen's could lead eventually to a subforum that has lots of members on the exterminationist side and few revisionist takers

If one is afraid to post a statement of fact under their real name and defend it, then they don't have much confidence that what they posted is a fact. Challenging others to find even the slightest crack in your rebuttable presumption will only give you the opportunity to fix that crack and make the statement of fact irrefutable. The goal is to test yourself. The goal is to reach perfection. The goal is to develop a statement of fact that is flawless and irrefutable. The cowardice exibited here today in this thread is stunning. The stupidity even more so. No wonder the jews are still allowed to shove their lies down the ignorant masses' throats. The jews are chortling reading what the likes of you cowards are writing. You "revisionists" embarass me. If you think that you're the toughest SOB on the block, you stand out in the middle of the street and challenge all commers. To pretent that you are the toughest SOB on the block, yet refuse to stand in the middle of the street and accept all challengers, you are nothing but a delusional coward.

And you''re afraid that some exterminationist is going to post a a statement of fact about the holohoax and be able to defend it without lying and dodging? Give me a break, and give me an example of such.

Maintain a high signal to noise ratio, i.e., make sure your posts are informative and that they make a meaningful addition to the discussion. High noise posting is especially unwelcome on the Debate board.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:29 pm Why any holyH true-believer who is discussing in good faith even needs to be anonymous beats me. That alone does rather prove they are NOT arguing in good faith.

This is true for "believers" but tilts the table heavily against revisionists who still face ongoing social, legal, professional, financial, etc. persecution for "coming out" even with the best of intentions regarding their stance on this subject.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm This proposal of yours…

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm …Keen's could lead eventually to a subforum that has lots of members on the exterminationist side and few revisionist takers, for obvious reasons, skewing the rightful balance of the debate which shouldn't be impacted by these social/legal/etc repression efforts.

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm The reason carving out special advantages for using real names wouldn't be ideal here is the same reason revisionists are disadvantaged in the "real world".

Callafangers wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:41 pm There is great personal risk for most revisionists in using their real names, whereas there is near-zero risk (and possibly some praise or incentives) for exterminationists.

Keen wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 7:01 pm

Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:22 pm Not a good idea for those who live in countries where Holocaust revisionism is "only" a social suicide by the way.

That is exacly what a thread like the one I'm proposing is designed to eliminate. And if a person who lives in a country that has freedom of speech isn't willing to sacrafice in order to maintain their free speech rights, then they don't care much about their freedom of speech rights. Anyone who lives in a country where they could end up in jail OBVIOUSLY wouldn't / couldn't use the suggested subforum. But the subforum would still benifit them because it's designed to develop irrefutable statements of fact that can stand up in court. (And I'm well aware of the fact than even irrefutable statememts of fact can lead to prison in some countries.)