Re: A new David Cole interview and scrutiny of the middle ground
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 3:20 am
You corrected it after we pointed out that you were wrong. The issue of burial density (bodies per cubic meter) was raised in the OP, Nov 20, 2024. It was a major point. You posted in the thread extensively. Rage quit the thread for a couple months. And then on January 27th(!) after 14 pages of weirdness you attempted to calculate a burial density (which you should have done on PAGE ONE). Aaaaand you bungled it badly. Again, I don't care that you bungled a calculation. It happens. But I find it amusing that you bungled THAT calculation which was one of the main points raised in the OP. What the hell were you doing all that time!? To me it betrays your shallow thinking on the topic.bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 2:11 amHow long did I wait to make my correction from 33 to 25? Was it days, weeks, or maybe it was less than 2 hours?Archie wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 1:45 am I can forgive an arithmetic error but what I find amusing is that he waited that long to do such a basic and crucial calculation. Not only did bombsaway do very poorly in that thread, he bizarrely continues to indulge in rather shameless and undeserved touchdown celebrations.
And you can see I was making volume calculations (which can simply be extrapolated to 25) on the first page.
You're grasping at straws buddy.
There's no celebration really, you stopped participating, failed to answer my point about body compression over time, also failed to answer the central question of why bodies destroyed and dumped back in the graves mixed with sand. That's a forfeit.