The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Robert Jan van Pelt, no friend to revisionists, wrote this: There have been additions to the camp the Russians found in 1945 as well as deletions, and the suppression of the prisoner reception site is matched by the reconstruction of Crematory I just outside the north-east perimeter of the present ...

Here is Hilberg, 1961 edition, page 570. The amounts [of Zyklon] were not large, but they were noticeable. Almost the whole of the Auschwitz supply was needed for the gassing of people; very little was used for fumigation . Then in 1989, Pressac, sensing the problem with this narrative post ...

Here's an article by an Ahkenazi jew on his DNA results. First, he admits that Ashkenazis come from Europe ! (So CJ and others in denial take note: they are not from ‘Israel’ nor the middle east). This DNA test argument doesn't mean anything, though. 23andme is not telling him his ancestral origins, ...

The genetic evidence for Khazar ancestry just isn't there. I think Elhaik sufficiently demonstrates this himself with his 2013 study linked above. His PCA puts European Jews roughly inbetween Europeans and Middle Easterners which is consistent with mixed ancestry from both. The fact that various ...

ChatGPT might have hallucinated. I agree that it didn't make sense but that's why we go back and forth to discover the truth when there is new information to add or we need to correct a mistake. Your AI took one of Germar Rudolf's core arguments against homicidal gassings, inverted the facts, and ...

Markiewicz et al. (1994) did measure total cyanides, but they emphasized the relevant compounds: iron-cyanide complexes, which are chemically stable and persist longer in masonry. Isn't this an exact reversal of what happened? I believe a correct version of this statement would be: Markiewicz et al ...

I was reading through Browning's book quoted in the OP. His framing on the Eichmann issue took me by surprise: When I have suggested to my colleagues that we must take seriously Eichmann’s repeated testimony to the effect that he learned from Heydrich in the fall of 1941 of Hitler’s order for the phy ...

The problem with that caption, is that it is not backed by evidence of people being deloused and moved to housing. Are you joking? The album has some captions written in it. The one given for inmates who just had a shave and change of clothes is "after delousing". This is definitive evidence of ...

At the very end, I asked it to make the best argument that it could that the Holocaust did not exist, based on the inconsistencies and inaccuracies of Eichmann's testimonies and it gave me and the answer you can see might surprise you! The words "best argument" don't appear. What you actually asked ...

Whoever claimed the Album is proof of murder, is wrong. It is part of the corroborating evidence of mass transports arriving at Birkenau and the selection process. Yad Vashem : "The album you will see presented here is known as the Auschwitz album and it is the only surviving visual evidence of the ...

If I may butt in, the internet has no shortage of people eager to uphold the Holocaust Narrative. I don't think he's a sockpuppet. Or if he is, I don't regard him any differently from any other anonymous user on the internet. You already defeated him when you demonstrated he was wrong and dishonest ...

So in short Stangneth's hypothesis is that Eichmann was originally lying, then at some point he felt Sassen "had entrapped him", and because of that he switched modes to "come 100% clean" i.e. confess. But why would he confess rather than deny it? Or abort the project? The only reason an entrapped ...

Yes, you should be able to find any of the original German (in addition to Dalton's analysis on each entry), here: https://archive.org/download/gbblst/Goebbels%20on%20the%20Jews%20-%20Edited%20and%20Translated%20by%20Thomas%20Dalton%20%282019%29/Goebbels%20on%20the%20Jews%3B%20The%20Complete ...

Thanks for posting this. I knew some of his diary entries were favorable for revisionism, or at the very least neutral and ambiguous, but I was not aware just how contrary they are to the extermination hypothesis. It's baffling that there are people who still claim the March 27 entry is evidence for ...

Another win for revisionism. That podcast actually went up on December 9, but everyone missed it. Anyway, what must be remarked on here is what I am calling the Cope Argument. The unnamed author of this podcast and article admits that Vera Alexander was wrong when in her sworn testimony she ...