The CODOH Revisionist Forum

.
The guy who just resigned from the Trump administration has something to say about a topic that has been closed down here at CODOH.

So look away now if you are a gullible dupe who stubbornly believes that a certain foreign power with thousands of dual-citizen sayan citizens, who are infiltrated in all areas of Western nations and their political, social, legal, medical, journalistic and military systems, could ever have been involved in either the public murder or a cover-up:

As much as I like Trump, a man who I never took for being religious or indeed very pro israel, I think he has been suckered into this fucking dumb war against Iran by the chosenites in israel.

Iran has needed a proper kicking for many a long decade but this action seems to have been thought through as if in a coma. I cannot see how they could have mucked it up so comprehensively and misunderstood the defence system Iran has developed. It's called I think, the Mosaic system and is very difficult to locate and harder to destroy.

Joe Kent is right and though I had never heard of him prior to this action he seems to have all the right credentials to understand what is and is not happening.

I spoke to a close friend about this war the other day and she seems to think the Christian Zionists in Trump's administration who all deeply support israel and its direction of travel are behind all of this. The little shit otherwise known as Benjamin Netanyahu ( Mileikowsky) is a very dangerous turd who needs flushing down the biggest toilet bowl we can find. Pete Hegseth is one of these dangerous Christian Zionists and if he could learn how to speak to the media with some aplomb and intelligence might go far, but as he dresses like an 18 yr old and has the vocab of a halfwit I won't be holding my breath.

borjastick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2026 8:57 am As much as I like Trump…

Iran has needed a proper kicking for many a long decade…

What a disgusting attitude. It shows your ignorance of history and again that you are a gullible dupe of zio-propaganda.

Firstly, your reply has NOTHING to do with the topic title.

Secondly, despite what we are constantly fed in misinfo ‘news’ reports, Iran has done NOTHING against any western country for centuries and instead has been the target of decades of interference, exploitation, attempted destabilisation and recently decades of crippling sanctions.

Thirdly, this post was about Joe Kent CONFIRMING that there was a high-level cover-up of the Kirk killing.
Are you guys really so blind?

Recently we had Hektor advocating sex with children over 12 years old in a topic-thread by someone trying to minimise the Epstein, zio blackmail racket. Culprit being exonerated = zionist jews.
Now we have you justifying an illegal attack against Iran that is going to cause destruction of scarce resources plus leave ecological destruction and global economic mayhem. Culprit being exonerated = zionist jews again.

And this forum won’t permit detailed discussion of the Kirk-killing nor its cover up.

I start to wonder how many sane, well-informed, decent people actually participate here.

.
Not only have zionist-supporting jooze been assassinating people with impunity FOR DECADES, using Mossad agents plus their world-wide network of sayanim supporters, but they are ALSO adept at then lying, covering-up, and misinforming about their involvement through the same world-wide network of Mossad agents and sayanim who have jobs as journalists, editors, etc.

They also managed to convince Donnie Trump that it was Iran who was behind the two assassination attempts on him.

For those with short memories, Thomas Crooks was permitted to shoot eight shots at him at Butler on July 13th 2024.
And two months later Ryan Routh had a go at doing the same at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Remember how the MSM news at the time speculated it was in fact IRAN that was behind these assassination attempts?

Well Trump seems have to believed that misinfo plus the continuous misinformation he was getting confirming that from his dual-nationality zio-advisors.

As his reply to a question asking why he (Trump) had ordered the murder of Iranian leader Syed Ali Khamenei, his wife, his grandaughter and others, revealed.

When reporter Jonathan Karl asked him WHY he had ordered the mass-murder Donnie replied: “I got him before he got me. They tried twice. Well I got him first”.



Jonathan Karl is a Jewish-American journalist.

Israel-aligned Trump advisors, Israeli intelligence, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself have gone to extreme lengths in order to tie Tehran to the plots. More shocking still is the fact that the FBI has manufactured a series of assassination plots, successfully convincing Trump that Iran was hunting him on US soil with highly sophisticated teams of hit men.

The man accused of leading the most significant of these operations, Asif Merchant, is currently on trial in a Brooklyn, NY federal court. After the US granted him a visa despite his presence on a terror watchlist, Merchant was in the constant company of an FBI confidential informant who ultimately steered the contrived plot to its conclusion. He never stood a chance of realizing his plans, and did not appear serious about doing so.

Independent journalist Ken Silva puts it succinctly in his forthcoming investigative book, ‘The Trump Assassination Plots’ “a closer look at the Merchant case reveals that at the very least…it was a highly controlled FBI sting operation that never posed a threat to Trump.
More nefariously, records and whistleblower disclosures indicate that Merchant may have been the patsy in a case totally fabricated by the undercover agents.”

https://www.unz.com/article/how-israel- ... -iran-war/

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2026 5:49 am ...
Recently we had Hektor advocating sex with children over 12 years old in a topic-thread by someone trying to minimise the Epstein, zio blackmail racket. Culprit being exonerated = zionist jews.
Now we have you justifying an illegal attack against Iran that is going to cause destruction of scarce resources plus leave ecological destruction and global economic mayhem. Culprit being exonerated = zionist jews again.
...

That's a rather disgusting way to misrepresent what I wrote. I didn't 'justify' anything, I pointed to the legal definitions. They have to be clarified in such matters.

Hektor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2026 12:07 am

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2026 5:49 am ...
Recently we had Hektor advocating sex with children over 12 years old in a topic-thread by someone trying to minimise the Epstein, zio blackmail racket. Culprit being exonerated = zionist jews.
Now we have you justifying an illegal attack against Iran that is going to cause destruction of scarce resources plus leave ecological destruction and global economic mayhem. Culprit being exonerated = zionist jews again.
...

I didn't 'justify' anything, I pointed to the legal definitions. They have to be clarified in such matters.

It’s been deleted now. I took it and still regard what you wrote as ‘justification’.
What “ legal definition” states sex with children “aged 12 years upwards” is not a crime categorised as paedophilia?

OK.

There is two definitions... one from psychology the other is the legal countries.
1. The psychological definition of pedophilia would be attraction to persons that haven't developed secondary sex organs / features like breasts or pubic hair. Virtually any person under 12 hasn't developed that yet. Plenty of 14 year olds already did.

2. the legal definition relevant would be for statutory rape and/or sexual offenses with minors. And there it is usually a threshold age that is decisive whether the crime has been committed or not. And this differs from country to country, but usually that seems to be between 14 and 16 years of age.

How insisting on definitions that are exact is 'justification of pedophilia' is above me. In fact there is good reason to believe that blurring those definitions leads to bigger tolerance and acceptance thereof. And I've seen the most ludicrous redefining at work already.

There is e.g. the 25 year old who marries a 16 year old being called 'a pedophile, nowadays. That mature 16 year old girls may want to marry as to have an orderly long term sexual relationship is apparently above some of the post-modern minds.

The other issue is when middle aged men marry or date women in their 20s. They get called "pedophiles" as well, especially by jealous middle aged women who realize that man act like that, because women their age-group aren't attractive to heterosexual men. Hence the name-calling.

To be frank, it used to be the norm in Western Societies that females married as what is now called teenagers. The criteria seemed to be that they were recognizable as fully developed women and likely fertile / capable to bear children.

I get that the social norms have changed in most Western countries. It's assumed that 'the kids' can have sex with each other from high-school onward... And essentially they should live out their sexual desires through their teens and twenties. Marriage, if at all, should be done in their 30s or even 40s. Women will that way have less children, if at all. Pointing this out is then considered old-fashioned at best, rather repressive or even somehow Nazi-like.

There is of course the Islamic justification of pedophile relationship with Mohamed and his child bride. And in the Talmud there is also a mode of justification. Pagans may find it in the Myth of some deities. Christianity doesn't have to offer that and became 'out' in wider circles since the boomers were born. For most part White folks considered sex between male and female who are married the acceptable norm. Anything outside struggled to get full justification for long. It's just that all norms seem to become challenged since WW2. And this with increasing speed.

Hektor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2026 2:46 pm OK. There is two definitions... one from psychology the other is the legal countries…
2. the legal definition relevant would be for statutory rape and/or sexual offenses with minors. …And this differs from country to country, but usually that seems to be between 14 and 16 years of age.

The topic was about Epstein and USA. It is 17 to 18 yrs in USA.
https://uslawexplained.com/pedophilia

Hektor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2026 2:46 pm How insisting on definitions that are exact is 'justification of pedophilia' is above me.

Pedophilia is a mental disorder where an individual seeks sexual gratification from children. A 12 year old is regarded as a child in every civilisation!!!! You tried to justify Epstein by arguing sex with children from “above 12 years onwards” was acceptable behaviour and not criminal. The CODOH forum’s administrator decided it was necessary to delete your comment.

Hektor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2026 2:46 pmThere is of course the Islamic justification of pedophile relationship with Mohamed and his child bride.

Muhammed NEVER had a “child bride”. Aisha was 18 yrs old when their marriage was consummated. We know that because the age difference between her and her older sister is recorded and because the age of her sister at her death and the years is recorded. Plus we have the year of the marriage consummation.
That is yet another example of ‘christian’ and ‘jewish” anti-Islamic misinformation becoming fixed in the minds of the vast majority of people.
If you can’t check and accept the above info and correct yourself, then you have successfully been duped.

BACK ON TOPIC — JEWISH ASSASSINATIONS

DID collectives of Jews orchestrate the assassination of a sitting US President (JFK) and a potential President (RFK) and then operate the resultant cover-up and clandestine, jewish coup d’etat of the USA?

Did they do the same in the public murder and cover-up bogus ‘investigation of Charlie Kirk, as was recently alleged by Joe Kent?

Were they behind the murder by the US of Syed Ali Khameini and members of his family, General Solomeni and bystanders after luring him to a ‘peace’ talk, and all the Iranian nuclear scientists?

Were the same ideologically motivated jewish collectives behind the Skripal poisoning and the Litvinenko poisoning as false flags to manipulate the gullible public against Vladimir Putin?

Etc., etc.



https://www.unz.com/runz/israeli-assass ... -scrutiny/

Well, this took a turn...
Pedophiles should get the rope, like Leo Frank did, and the practice of child brides is absolutely disgusting, as is بچه بازی .

Full stop...

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 1:27 am...

Hektor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2026 2:46 pm How insisting on definitions that are exact is 'justification of pedophilia' is above me.

Pedophilia is a mental disorder where an individual seeks sexual gratification from children. A 12 year old is regarded as a child in every civilisation!!!! You tried to justify Epstein by arguing sex with children from “above 12 years onwards” was acceptable behaviour and not criminal. The CODOH forum’s administrator decided it was necessary to delete your comment.....

That was not what I argued at all. What I argued was that pedophilia would be a misleading assignation, if the person in question is already fully developed. Another issue is 'age of consent laws' and one something is statutory rape, there age benchmarks play a role.

Epstein's ploy there was to blur the lines between 'young women' and minors. Obviously to get people with some standing into compromised positions. But it was about 'sex with minors' not pedophilia as such afaik.

Sometimes comments get deleted, because reactions they get, not about the actual content of the comment.

Muhammed NEVER had a “child bride”. Aisha was 18 yrs old when their marriage was consummated. We know that because the age difference between her and her older sister is recorded and because the age of her sister at her death and the years is recorded.

That is news to me. The usual Islam apologetics work a little different in this regard. Even Islamic scholarship largely rejects this view.

It remains that various cultures have different views on morality. That may include sexuality. But it also can link to assassination and crime being allowable. At least as far as out-group people are concerned. With Jews (and Muslims) it is the dual morality they adhere to and that means that it is OK to assassinate (or mistreat them in other ways) people outside the in-group.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 1:27 am Muhammed NEVER had a “child bride”. Aisha was 18 yrs old when their marriage was consummated.

Well all the Hadiths we have say she was 6 at marriage and 9 when it was consummated.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Aisha%27s_Age

That said, the Hadiths were written long after Muhammad, and many of them clearly have legendary stories, so we can't be completely sure it's accurate. But that would be a general criticism of the fact that we don't know much about Muhammad's life given source critical problems with the Hadiths. Some have even argued he didn't exist, although I'm not arguing that here.

fireofice wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 6:57 am

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 1:27 am Muhammed NEVER had a “child bride”. Aisha was 18 yrs old when their marriage was consummated.

Well all the Hadiths we have say she was 6 at marriage and 9 when it was consummated.

That said, the Hadiths were written long after Muhammad, and many of them clearly have legendary stories, so we can't be completely sure it's accurate.

Yeah, sure.
Just like ALL the Third Reich High Command (apart from Göring and conveniently suicided Himmler) came to be duped by misinformation against themselves and believed that there actually had been a secret genocide of ALL Jooze that they somehow had known nothing about.

Facts are facts.
•The actual historical evidence proves Aisha was NOT 9 at the time of her marriage consummation but was 18 years old. There is more corroborating evidence than that which I have already alluded to. Such as her presence at the battle of the trench giving out water (small children would not be permitted to be there but teenagers would).

• Just as the actual historical evidence proves there are no mass graves of the alleged hundreds of thousands of supposedly holocausted jooze at Treblinka or Majdanek or Auschwitz or Chelmno, or… etc.

• Just as the actual historical evidence over centuries confirms that jooish collectives are experts at lying and creating ‘poor-us eternal, innocent victim’ narratives about themselves plus false narratives about those they perceive as their enemies.

• AND …just as the actual recent evidence strongly suggests zio-jooze were behind the murders of JFK, RFK, Litvinenko, General Solemeini, Ali Khameini and family, Charlie Kirk, etc., and the same zio_jooze have been involved in a rather obvious cover-up of the last named individual.

Etc., etc.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 11:00 am

fireofice wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 6:57 am

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 1:27 am Muhammed NEVER had a “child bride”. Aisha was 18 yrs old when their marriage was consummated.

Well all the Hadiths we have say she was 6 at marriage and 9 when it was consummated.

That said, the Hadiths were written long after Muhammad, and many of them clearly have legendary stories, so we can't be completely sure it's accurate.

Yeah, sure.
Just like ALL the Third Reich High Command (apart from Göring and conveniently suicided Himmler) came to be duped by misinformation against themselves and believed that there actually had been a secret genocide of ALL Jooze that they somehow had known nothing about.
...

Changing the subject doesn't help you here. Fact is that the 6/9 year age stems from Muslim scholarship itself and their texts weren't in hostile archives for decades as were the German archives / documents. It's the apples and oranges at work there.

I recall Judeo-apologists using the same tactic, when being confronted with inconvenient Talmud passages. The other technique was to point to the "Protocols of the elders of Zion" or "Fake Talmud quotes". That exists but is merely a distraction from the serious literature on the subject.

It's also clear that...
1) The Islamic (sexual) mores are different from the occidental ones.
2) Same applies to Judaist mores and cosmology. Islam is sort of a less sophisticated version of Judaism in many ways. What blurs the idea is that many Jews don't only have a 'Western' appearance, but are also strongly assimilated in many ways. Reform Judaism is commonly like liberal Protestantism without Jesus and with some other additives absent in the broader Protestant culture.
3) The Western sexual Mores have changed drastically over time, especially since WW2 and that those changes were influenced by Jewish initiatives in cultural production as well as through Reception of the Holocaust Narrative, which corroded traditional Western ideas and institutions.


With the high regard given to truth in the New Testament deceit and lying is far more difficult to sell to the parish as it is in Judaism (or Islam). That gives them a competitive advantage over trad. Christian societies in some ways, while the latter are more livable and productive. That is also why Jews preferred residing in them and Muslims moved into them also at some stage.

fireofice wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 6:57 am

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2026 1:27 am Muhammed NEVER had a “child bride”. Aisha was 18 yrs old when their marriage was consummated.

Well all the Hadiths we have say she was 6 at marriage and 9 when it was consummated.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Aisha%27s_Age

That said, the Hadiths were written long after Muhammad, and many of them clearly have legendary stories, so we can't be completely sure it's accurate. But that would be a general criticism of the fact that we don't know much about Muhammad's life given source critical problems with the Hadiths. Some have even argued he didn't exist, although I'm not arguing that here.

The hadith are a traditionally, similar to parts of the Talmud. At least some can be taken with a grain of thought. And even if one disputes the Existence of Mohammed, it still likely that he then is a construction from several other figures of that kind. An integral part of Islam is indeed its appeal to appetites including sexual appetites and even vile affections. On the other hand, it is strongly rule based like orthodox Judaism, just a simpler version thereof. But it is also part of the appeal as it gives its followers some order and structure.

Hektor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 1:28 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 11:00 am

fireofice wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 6:57 am
Well all the Hadiths we have say she was 6 at marriage and 9 when it was consummated.

That said, the Hadiths were written long after Muhammad, and many of them clearly have legendary stories, so we can't be completely sure it's accurate.

Yeah, sure.
Just like ALL the Third Reich High Command (apart from Göring and conveniently suicided Himmler) came to be duped by misinformation against themselves and believed that there actually had been a secret genocide of ALL Jooze that they somehow had known nothing about.
...

…The Western sexual Mores have changed drastically over time, especially since WW2 and that those changes were influenced by Jewish initiatives in cultural production as well as through Reception of the Holocaust Narrative, which corroded traditional Western ideas and institutions.

With the high regard given to truth in the New Testament deceit and lying is far more difficult to sell to the parish as it is in Judaism…

You didn’t check the info I previously provided, did you.

As you did not you are shown to be in denial.

Start a new thread. This one is about jooish assassinations.

Anything to say about Joe Kent’s admission concerning the cover_up pf the Kirk killing?

I see they are using the same tired tactic of trying to discredit Kent’s insider info by smearing him as an anti-semite.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2026 1:43 pm ...

You didn’t check the info I previously provided, did you.

As you did not you are shown to be in denial.

Start a new thread. This one is about jooish assassinations.

Anything to say about Joe Kent’s admission concerning the cover_up pf the Kirk killing?

I see they are using the same tired tactic of trying to discredit Kent’s insider info by smearing him as an anti-semite.

I got no idea, what you are up to here. But to stick to subject (assassinations) is indeed a valid point.

The thing with 'insider info' isn't that it stems from 'anti-semites' or judeolizers. The problem is that it is rather hard to verify/validate for an 'outsider'. It's a bit like the testimony for homicidal gassings... There aren't two or more witnesses for any of those supposed events. It's always some single witness that has seen it at some stage. And while the witnesses can agree on some suspicious details they never really can agree on a specific date. Names of victims, perpetrators, corpses are absent as well.

So please forgive me, if I'm careful with 'insider info' and insist on proper investigations being performed first. What such info can however provide is data for building a working hypothesis that can be investigated then.