The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Beyond the False Dichotomy
Those who merely skim this post may see terms like Gaskammer and immediately assume I am promoting the standard Holocaust narrative. I am not. My focus is on the intersection of multiple primary-source realities: the FPLO (Fahrplanordnung) railway documents, the manufacture of the Muselmänner through state-managed starvation, and the administrative 'culling' of the terminally ill.

This research moves past the blame-centric narratives of both sides. Whether caused by total war, military food rationing, or the systematic breakdown of transport logistics, the result was a massive population of terminally ill people that the state had to 'process.' By examining the 14f13 protocol and the 1939 Euthanasia Memorandum, we see that 'Special Treatment' was not a desperate invention of genocide, but a clinical, bureaucratic response to a human catastrophe manufactured by state incompetence and indifference.
I have made a more extensive post at RODOH


The Administrative and Medical Reality of Sonderbehandlung

The Legal Shield: Hitler’s 1939 Memorandum

The foundation of the camp "culling" system was not an explicit order for mass murder, but a Legal Immunity Memorandum. Signed by Adolf Hitler on his private stationery and backdated to September 1, 1939, this document was a "small match" intended to grant medical practitioners immunity for the "mercy killing" (Gnadentod) of incurably sick children and the disabled. It created a legal vacuum, shielding doctors from murder charges (Mord). This limited decree was subsequently hijacked and expanded by the SS into Aktion 14f13—an industrial protocol used to liquidate "unproductive" inmates.




Manufactured Terminal Illness: The Corfu Case Study

The "Special Treatment" (Sonderbehandlung) of the Corfu Jews in June 1944 is the primary example of this administrative evolution. Due to state incompetence and the prioritization of military logistics over "non-productive" cargo, the Reichsbahn (documented in FPLO Da 204) conducted an 18-day transport involving near-total dehydration.

Biological reality dictates that acute renal failure begins after 72 hours without water. By the time the transport reached its destination, the majority were in a state of terminal physical collapse—they were Muselmänner before they even hit the ramp.

The Responsibility Vacuum

The FPLO (Fahrplanordnung) schedules prove these transports had the lowest priority, often sitting for days on unshaded sidings while military trains passed. A catastrophic "responsibility vacuum" existed:

SS Guards: Viewed their role as security-only, not quartermasters.

Reichsbahn Staff: Viewed the train as discrete units of cargo with no mandate for life support.

No "due care" protocols existed. The guards felt providing water was not their responsibility, and the state provided no budget for it.

The Clinical "Solution" at Birkenau

Upon arrival, medical officers were confronted with approximately 1,200 people in terminal collapse. They could not walk; their organs had shut down; they would be dead in hours. Shooting them on the ramp was not a "medical" option. Under the legal protection of the 1939 Memorandum, these victims were carried to the morgue facilities (gas chambers if you like) and subjected to a small amount of pesticide (Zyklon B). In their metabolic fragility, they succumbed instantly. This was the clinical "hastening" of an inevitable death—the 14f13 "mercy killing" of a population the state had already broken.

Why Himmler Hid the Word from Hitler

The most damning evidence of this "culling" is the Korherr Report (1943). Himmler ordered the term Sonderbehandlung removed (Nuremberg Document NO-5193) and replaced with durchgeschleust ("processed"). He hid the word because the RSHA (Sept 20, 1939) had explicitly defined it as "Execution" (d.h. Exekution).

Himmler wasn't hiding "missing Jews" in the Russian interior (the revisionist "Lost in Russia" fallacy); he was hiding the fact that the "small match" of Hitler's memorandum had become an industrial forest fire. He hid the Special Treatment because it was an admission of industrialised killing to cover up the results of state-managed starvation and neglect.

Conclusion: Shovels vs. Furnaces

The standard narrative of a "deliberate genocide" ignores the reality of systemic incompetence, indifference, and a shocking lack of culpability. Nearly all Greek Jews underwent similar grueling journeys and suffered the same medical fate as the Corfu Jews.

By 1944, the SS had replaced the shovel with the furnace and the industrial current of the Sola and Vistula. The "mass grave" obsession is irrelevant for a system designed to leave only ash. To ask for a grave for a victim of "Industrial Culling" is to admit a failure to understand the very mechanism of Sonderbehandlung. The false dichotomy between "Revisionist" and "Exterminationist" is unnecessary for those genuinely concerned with the logistical and biological reality of the times.

Primary Sources Referenced:
FPLO Da 204: Reichsbahn Transport Schedules (Greek Transports).
RSHA Decree (20 Sept 1939): Definition of Sonderbehandlung.
Nuremberg PS-1151: IKL Guidelines for 14f13 Selection.
Nuremberg NO-5193: Himmler’s Directive to Korherr.
1939 Euthanasia Memorandum: Hitler’s legal immunity decree.

Nazgul, buddy. You have long been a valued member of this forum (and other forums). But could you please take it easy with all the new topics for a while? Even setting aside the AI use, you've started 12 new topics since the 11th which is too much. We are not a huge forum, so you can't realistically expect everyone to read these daily essays and give you feedback. Most of these posts also do not have a clear debate proposition. To be frank, I am having trouble understanding most of them which appear to be trying to play both sides.

Perhaps these should be posted on a personal blog or something and you could link people to them in your signature? Something like that.

I do not intend any offense here, but as other members have begun to complain please understand that it needs to be addressed.

Archie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 28, 2026 2:28 am Nazgul, buddy. You have long been a valued member of this forum (and other forums). But could you please take it easy with all the new topics for a while? Even setting aside the AI use, you've started 12 new topics since the 11th which is too much. We are not a huge forum, so you can't realistically expect everyone to read these daily essays and give you feedback. Most of these posts also do not have a clear debate proposition. To be frank, I am having trouble understanding most of them which appear to be trying to play both sides.

Perhaps these should be posted on a personal blog or something and you could link people to them in your signature? Something like that.

I do not intend any offense here, but as other members have begun to complain please understand that it needs to be addressed.

No issues. I am reframing these issues based strictly on primary sources and am not taking 'sides' at all—simply providing a new context based on the FPLO and 14f13 evidence. As requested, I will refrain from starting new topics here and will post further research on RODOH. These posts are the culmination of years of work; feel free to delete them if the technical depth is not a fit for this forum. No offense taken. However that is that

Nazgul wrote: ↑Sat Feb 28, 2026 2:37 am

Archie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 28, 2026 2:28 am Nazgul, buddy. You have long been a valued member of this forum (and other forums). But could you please take it easy with all the new topics for a while? Even setting aside the AI use, you've started 12 new topics since the 11th which is too much. We are not a huge forum, so you can't realistically expect everyone to read these daily essays and give you feedback. Most of these posts also do not have a clear debate proposition. To be frank, I am having trouble understanding most of them which appear to be trying to play both sides.

Perhaps these should be posted on a personal blog or something and you could link people to them in your signature? Something like that.

I do not intend any offense here, but as other members have begun to complain please understand that it needs to be addressed.

No issues. I am reframing these issues based strictly on primary sources and am not taking 'sides' at all—simply providing a new context based on the FPLO and 14f13 evidence. As requested, I will refrain from starting new topics here and will post further research on RODOH. These posts are the culmination of years of work; feel free to delete them if the technical depth is not a fit for this forum. No offense taken.

Yes, I definitely noticed that these are things you have been looking into for years. I would consider them more research topics than debate topics.

My advice would be to take some time to write them up yourself and try to publish them somewhere as articles. Publishing them more gradually as articles will also give people more time to digest them.

Archie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 28, 2026 2:42 am Yes, I definitely noticed that these are things you have been looking into for years. I would consider them more research topics than debate topics.

My advice would be to take some time to write them up yourself and try to publish them somewhere as articles. Publishing them more gradually as articles will also give people more time to digest them.

This will be my final post on this forum. The high volume of recent topics was not intended as a 'debate' series, but as the real-time reframing of years of research into a cohesive analytical circuit. This work culminated in my recent posts regarding the Corfu Jews, documenting how the systematic failures of the transport system manufactured terminal illness, which was subsequently liquidated under the 14f13 euthanasia protocol.

As requested, I will refrain from further posting here. I am transitioning this work to RODOH and my own personal archive, where the technical depth of these issues—ranging from Holocaust logistics to the complexities of quantum spacetime—can be presented in a more suitable format. My methodology remains strictly focused on primary sources and biological/logistical constants; while I utilize AI tools to polish grammar and syntax, the core archival synthesis and intellectual property remain entirely my own. I take full authorship of my work and stand by its originality.

For those interested in the 'straight line' between the FPLO schedules, the 14f13 medical commissions, and the 1939 Memorandum, the research will continue elsewhere. Thank you for the input and the years of discussion.