Page 1 of 1
Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 3:58 pm
by Nessie
Keen wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:24 am
Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 11, 2025 7:33 am
I answer questions when I am referred to as Nessie, the male pronoun is used and there is no bullying or abuse, in any form.
Let's put that to the test:
Mr. Nessie,
Did CSC discover archaeological evidence that proves the existence of the "huge mass grave" that she labeled F16 - Yes. - or - No. - ??
The geophysics identified F16 in the list of Features, as oval, c10m by c9m, is described as "Pit. Candles and stones on east edge." and it has a mound of earth next to it. In the report text, it is further described as "These features likely represent post-war activity". So it is not a "huge mass grave" as you described it. So the answer is no.
If your answer is - Yes., then;
Can you show us the physical evidence that proves that TII "huge mass grave" F16 actually exists and actually contains the remains of at least two people?
Do you deny that Treblinka II's F16 is an actual "huge mass grave" that has been scientifically proven to contain the remains of at least two people - Yes. - or - No. - ??
There is no evidence it is a "huge mass grave" containing the remains of at least two people.
Have you read the reports linked to below?
https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/35 ... s12PhD.pdf
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:33 pm
by Archie
Come on, Nessie. You wait for Keen to be placed in quarantine and then start replying to him on the other board where he can't respond? That's a bitch move if I ever saw one.
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:38 pm
by Nessie
I have had Keen on ignore, so I cannot see his posts, for a few days now. I did not realise what you had done, with this new section till now. It is not as if I have any interest in what he gets up to and I only responded to that one post, because I saw it, as I had not logged on.
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:49 pm
by Stubble
>insert forbidden epithet<
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:50 pm
by Keen
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 5:55 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 13, 2025 3:58 pm
Did CSC discover archaeological evidence that proves the existence of the "huge mass grave" that she labeled F16 - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Nessie:
No.
Can you show us the physical evidence that proves that TII "huge mass grave" F16 actually exists and actually contains the remains of at least two people?
Nessie:
No.
Why can't you show us the physical evidence that the pit labeled F16 actually exists?
Does it actually exist - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Do you deny that Treblinka II's F16 is an actual "huge mass grave" that has been scientifically proven to contain the remains of at least two people - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Nessie: ??
Nessie:
The geophysics identified F16 in the list of Features, as oval, c10m by c9m, is described as "Pit. Candles and stones on east edge." and it has a mound of earth next to it.
Did it require geophysics to locate and identify F16 as a pit containing candles and stones and/or the mound of earth next to it - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Nessie:
The geophysics identified F16 in the list of Features, as oval, c10m by c9m, is described as "Pit. Candles and stones on east edge." and it has a mound of earth next to it. In the report text, it is further described as "These features likely represent post-war activity". So it is not a "huge mass grave" as you described it.
Do you deny that, in the map below, CSC labeled F16 as a "possible grave site" - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Do you deny that CSC scientifically proved the existence of 15 "huge mass graves" within the boundary of Treblinka II - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 2:23 am
by Keen
I want to make a point about a post that may be moved over here soon before I shut things down for the night. (I may not get back on tomorrow.) This point may have been brought up in the Jankiel Wiernik thread in another section, but regardless, Wiernik couldn't locate any of his fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" when given the chance, even with the help of other numerous so-called "eyewitnesses" and a group of "investigators." And why wasn't he able to locate these "huge mass graves"? Because they were not there of course, but his excuse was that they magically disappeared via "burning" which were described the "burnt" remains as only "partially charred."
And the alleged burning process that "partially charred" the jews allegedly did nothing to the skulls and teeth of the jews.
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:09 am
by Nessie
I have had a look at Keen's response and he has removed and refused to answer my one question. So, no more answers from me.
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 1:09 pm
by Keen
Nessie:
I have had Keen on ignore, so I cannot see his posts
I have had a look at Keen's response
Nessie, pretending he can't see my posts:
He's afraid to answer these simple questions:
Why can't you show us the physical evidence that the pit labeled F16 actually exists?
Does it actually exist - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If your answer is - Yes. - can you show us a photo of it - Yes. - or - No. - ??
So she runs away like a scared little girl!
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:59 pm
by Nessie
I click on some posts, to see if there is anything that I would respond to. I have made it quite simple for you, to get a response from me, but you constantly fail, because you are a coward who knows he would fail in a standard debate, as seen on this forum, with every poster, except you.
It is clear that you have not read C S-C report, that I have linked to, multiple times. You cannot understand much of it, hence your simplistic, inane, often nonsensical questions.
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:59 pm
by Keen
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 9:59 pm
by Keen
Keen wrote: ↑Fri Nov 14, 2025 2:23 am
I want to make a point about a post that may be moved over here soon before I shut things down for the night. (I may not get back on tomorrow.) This point may have been brought up in the Jankiel Wiernik thread in another section, but regardless, Wiernik couldn't locate any of his fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" when given the chance, even with the help of other numerous so-called "eyewitnesses" and a group of "investigators." And why wasn't he able to locate these "huge mass graves"? Because they were not there of course, but his excuse was that they magically disappeared via "burning" which were described the "burnt" remains as only "partially charred."
And the alleged burning process that "partially charred" the jews allegedly did nothing to the skulls and teeth of the jews.
Anyone know what happened to pilgrimofdark's post?
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=18643#p18643
Re: Split: Evidence relating to TII (Treblinka)
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 11:08 pm
by Stubble
Moved to the pool.