The CODOH Revisionist Forum

In November 1983, NATO's largest military exercise of the Cold War era, Able Archer 83, took place.

During Able Archer 83, NATO forces practiced sequentially moving troops into combat readiness levels from DEFCON 5 (peacetime) to DEFCON 1 (war). Since each level of combat readiness was practiced sequentially, KGB informants perceived them as a real combat alert. According to intelligence information, NATO military doctrine stated: "Operational readiness No. 1 is declared when there are obvious prerequisites for conducting a military operation. When it is clearly established that war is inevitable and can begin at any moment."

According to Western historians, the leadership of the Soviet Union believed that the only chance to withstand a NATO attack was to get ahead of it. In this regard, the CIA noted increased activity in the Baltic military district, the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, and in the locations of nuclear-armed aircraft carriers in the Polish People's Republic and the GDR: "all troops were put on alert, nuclear weapons storage facilities were opened."

The scenario published by NATO details a hypothetical scenario for Exercise Able Archer, which was used by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff in Washington, DC, and the UK Ministry of Defence in London. The war game would have involved Force Blue, representing NATO, and Force Orange, representing the Warsaw Pact. The scenario involved proxy conflicts escalating in Syria, South Yemen and Iran after Yugoslavia defected to the Blue bloc and Orange invaded Finland, Norway and West Germany.

Even modern historians admit that 1983 was much closer to a nuclear war than even the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. However, they officially deny the fact of a conflict between NATO and Warsaw Pact countries, which happened in November 1983.

The nuclear paranoia of the autumn of 1983 reached its peak in November, when the NATO war game Able Archer 83 began. The military planned to practice plans for a nuclear war and, in addition, wanted to test interaction at various stages of combat readiness under DEFCON.

The game did not involve troops - in fact, it was a practice of communication interaction between NATO headquarters: according to the game scenario, a nuclear conflict began due to a political crisis in Europe, which escalated into a war with the Warsaw Pact countries.
But it was hard to imagine a more inappropriate time for the start of secret war games: a week before, the United States invaded Grenada, and by the end of the month, American Pershing ballistic missiles were planned to be deployed in Western Europe.

Moscow believed that everything that was happening was part of something bigger, most likely - preparations for a nuclear strike on the USSR. Analysts involved in Operation RYAN reported that the number of encrypted messages between the US and UK had increased several-fold; the fact that both President Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher were taking part in the game also raised concerns. Each day of the war game in the USSR was perceived with increasing tension; information about the increase in the DEFCON combat readiness level up to the maximum was especially alarming. On November 9, two days before the end of the exercises, Soviet residents abroad received instructions to identify US plans to launch a preemptive strike; Soviet troops were transferred to a state of heightened combat readiness.

(From the article: "1983 - the peak of the nuclear threat" https://batenka.ru/protection/war/nuclear-threat-1983/).

Dr Gregory Pedlow, a historian, explains the war game:

The exercise scenario began with Orange (the hypothetical opponent) opening hostilities in all regions of ACE [Allied Command Europe] on 4 November (three days before the start of the exercise) and Blue (NATO) declaring a general alert. Orange initiated the use of chemical weapons on 6 November and by the end of that day had used such weapons throughout ACE. All of these events had taken place prior to the start of the exercise and were simply part of the written scenario. There had thus been three days of fighting and a deteriorating situation prior to the start of the exercise. This was desired because—as previously stated—the purpose of the exercise was to test procedures for transitioning from conventional to nuclear operations. As a result of Orange advance, its persistent use of chemical weapons, and its clear intentions to rapidly commit second echelon forces, SACEUR requested political guidance on the use of nuclear weapons early on Day 1 of the exercise (7 November 1983).

Exercise scenario: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEB ... 20NATO.pdf

Does anyone here remember November 4, 1983?

I have talked to people who were there that day. And they have mostly been able to overcome the mental barrier and recall specific moments of the Soviet-American escalation. I have heard claims:

1. That the US allies (probably the Israelis) shot down 24 or 27 Soviet planes;
2. That there was fear due to the deployment of Pershing missiles in Western Europe and some Reagan Space Program (perhaps a reference to Star Wars/Strategic Defense Initiative?);
3. That the world was "on the brink of nuclear war", with one person assessing the Soviet-American war of 1983 as "quite likely to have happened";
4. That there was some battle, the largest since WWII, that took place in the second half of 1983;
5. The general mood of depression and fear of imminent tragedy.

In general, people living in 1983 treated the theory as "interesting" and "having a right to exist".

This clearly cannot be attributed to a simple "clouding of consciousness", "Cotard syndrome" or something similar. Apparently, the Soviet-American war took place on November 4, 1983. For a number of reasons that I will mention later, this fact was repressed from the collective memory. Historians, publicists and journalists have reluctantly admitted only recently that this was the closest moment to Mutually Assured Destruction.