HansHill wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2026 1:12 pm
This is exactly the problem we are telling you Bombsaway. No matter which threads you pull on, the contradictions expose themselves. You've humourously just shown us now that Tauber contradicts not only Kula, but himself also.
FWIW Pressac is aware of many of Tauber's mistakes and contradictions and he spells them out in "Technique", attributing them to "the political climate" back in 1945. Either take the L that Tauber and Kula's accounts diverge, or get explaining.
Re the 1mm nice try. I gave you the courtesy of asking why you ignored the 1mm to give you a chance to perhaps admit you overlooked it, but it's clear to me now you """omitted""" it because you are in full confirmation bias mode. Of the three grid dimensions given, of course you just so happen to probe Archie with the two most favourable to your argument. Now you attempt a pivot to another "maybe", in that the fine inner mesh "maybe" had gaps.
Again, either take the L or get explaining
I addressed this contradiction on the last page actually "when kula talks about the third part of the column being movable, this is the can."
I quoted the 1 mm gap, never denied that, "It had to get through one layer essentially." (as opposed to the 3 Archie was going off about on the last page). this is weak sauce criticism.
Your confirmation bias hits because you are literally unable to critically examine your narrative of "witnesses lying". I'm here humoring the inanity, the vast majority of my posts are spent addressing criticisms of orthodoxy. You cannot do the same, seeming to short circuit when asked to look into the mirror.