A Proposal

[Keen]

Do you not realise how demeaning and dismissive you are, of the trained people, historians, archaeologists and criminal investigators, whose evidence gathering you hand wave away as inadequate? What about the witnesses you insult by suggesting they are lying? Why should I hold back when you don't?

EVERY "eyewitness" the the fraudulently alleged "body disposal" was lying. That is a legally proven fact.

EVERY archaeologist that has alleged discovering mass graves at B, C, P, S & TII is a proven liar. That is a legally proven fact.

See for yourself here:

https://thisisaboutscience.com/

[Cowboy]

I am sceptical of claims of geysers of blood and self burning corpses. I am not so arrogant to think that my scepticism has any evidential value. Instead, based on research into witness behaviour and recall, I regard such claims as hyperbole, emotive descriptive, likely atrocity story or rumour, which is quite common with witnesses, especially to traumatic events.

So, by this logic, we should be able to be skeptical of the gas chamber story/rumor? Skeptical that witnesses are repeating rumor and hyperbolizing death count claims? We know that intelligence agencies were planting rumors of all sorts throughout the war via black & gray propaganda in psychological operations. OSS documents provide instructions on how to create effective rumors, and they align very well with the many atrocity stories that came out of the war.

What is a rumor?

• The successful rumor is a simple, brief, concrete, and vivid story, purporting to come from inside sources and concerning persons and events familiar to all members of the group.

I don't want to de-rail the topic of the thread, but I felt this should be pointed out.