Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'

A containment zone for disruptive posters
User avatar
Nessie
Quarantined
Posts: 4168
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 4:43 pm Doesn't prove mass graves, also Doesn't prove a homicidal gas chamber. Proves a building.
The find of the remains of a building, that had been demolished and buried, does indeed only prove there was a building there and that it was demolished and buried.

The find of large areas of disturbed ground, pits, ash, cremated remains and human bones, proves that a lot of digging took place and that people were cremated and buried.

A genuine investigator, would then gather evidence to establish how that building and the remains came to be there, who was responsible and what took place. You deniers are not genuine investigators.
You repeatedly show that you do not understand the difference between evidence and testimony.
How so? Quote me and prove that I do not understand the difference. Testimony means a statement by someone, often in a legal context. Testimony is one of the many forms of evidence. Eyewitness statements are their testimony and that is a type of evidence. It is the best form of narrative evidence, as it covers events over time, providing context.

When eyewitnesses state a gas chamber was located in one part of a camp and mass graves in another, and surveys find the remains of the building and pits and buried human remains, the physical evidence corroborates their testimonial evidence. We now have context, evidence of what the building was used for and why there are buried, cremated human remains.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
K
Keen
Quarantined
Posts: 1609
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 5:53 pm The find of large areas of disturbed ground, pits, ash, cremated remains and human bones, proves that a lot of digging took place and that people were cremated and buried. We now have context, evidence of what the building was used for and why there are buried, cremated human remains.
Liar.

The fact that the following reward offer goes unclaimed is evidence that no cremations ever took place at T II and it is ipso facto proof that no significant amount of burnt bones have EVER been discovered within the boundary of T II - human or animal.
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)

Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)

Also note: This reward offer, as it applies to Treblinka II, can also be claimed for each 14 pounds of cremains discovered - ANYWHERE - within the camp boundary.

https://thisisaboutscience.com/
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Quarantined
Posts: 1609
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 5:53 pm The find of large areas of disturbed ground, pits, ash, cremated remains and human bones, proves that a lot of digging took place and that people were cremated and buried.
"Ash"?

nessie:
They were not full cremations to ashes at the AR camps either.
Image
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply