bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 1:42 pm
Clever conspirators. It is extremely likely they introduced this element into the story to strengthen the FG document, ...
You are using sarcasm to mask a bad argument. "Strengthen," lol.
It is extremely likely they introduced this element into the story because that was the standard number in the early postwar period
Hoess testified at Nuremberg in 1946. Eichmann's statements are from around 1960. It amazes me that you believe these post-1943 statements "confirm" a false number and confirm a 1943 dating.
This is exactly what I'm saying Archie. The conspirators were clearly playing the long game with the FG report carbon copy, so they could have ample time to strengthen it by getting Eichmann and Hoess to say things that corroborated it.