Where Myths Meet Their Demise
https://codohforum.com/
But who is that? Roberto Muehlenkamp? Do you think Nessie is Muehlenkamp? Oof, that is a serious slap in the face to Muehlenkamp. Those are quite obviously different people.
Marching to Zion Documentary:The run-off-the-mill Joe average thinks that Judaism is 'the religion of the Old Testament' and your church-goer may think "Jews are the chosen people that haven't accepted Jesus
What other evidence? Why do no Holocaust so-called revisionist produce an evidenced chronology as to what happened to the Jews in Europe, in particular those arrested by the Nazis and their Allies and sent to camps and ghettos?As revisionist views become known and common, the whole question of whether one 'believes' in the Holocaust narrative will come down to just how much weight one places on problematic witness claims and spurious documentation produced amid massive political incentives (and evidenced prevalence of ulterior motives), since all other evidence points the other direction.
“HUGE MASS GRAVES” are easily identifiable physical entities.
Historical investigations are normally about what happened, not what did not happen. To prove there was no extermination policy, that 6 million did not die and there were no gas chambers, needs evidence to prove there was a resettlement policy, millions of Jews were still alive in 1944-5 and what took place inside the AR camps, Chelmno and the A-B Kremas, instead of gas chambers. Revisionists cannot do that.Now, we don't dispute that there were measures on Jews during WW2 by NS-Germany and Axis countries. That's not what the controversy is about. What is in dispute are allegation of
1. Policy to exterminate all or most Jews.
2. Mortally figures during WW2 in the range of 6 million.
3. Usage of unusual execution methods like homicidal gas chambers.
Liar.
BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II
Are the remains of 2.145 million Jews really buried in the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves?
(The labeling of asking this legitimate adjudicable question as “hate / antisemitic” is your first clue that they do not want you to know what the answer is.)
OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.
Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be - LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.
Foundational scientific question: Can archaeologists prove, with 100% certainty, if millions of pounds of bones and tens of millions of teeth actually exist in a precisely known location?
Foundational legal question: Is it reasonable to doubt that the remains of 2.145 million Jews are actually buried in the 100 specifically and precisely identified locations in question?
Foundational legal principles that easily expose this transparent archaeological hoax: BURDEN OF PRODUCTION & BURDEN OF PERSUASION & BURDEN OF PROOF.
...
If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have
actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.
Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.
http://thisisaboutscience.com/
It is because he is proven to be who he said he was and he saw what he did. That he made mistakes, is to be expected, when recalling so many events, over a period of time.In the next episode : The reasons why Konrad Morgen confessed the use of gas chambers in Monowitz (Auschwitz III) rather than Birkenau (Auschwitz II) but is still a major witness to the Holocaust.
Indeed. When asked to justify their criticism of how orthodoxy investigated the Holocaust, by gathering evidence, establishing what was corroborated and constructing a chronological narrative with a conclusion, they RUN.all you guys can do is criticize orthodoxy, when the tables are turned and you are asked to provide your own narratives you RUN
Evidence from multiple studies prove that "plot holes" are common place in truthful testimonies. Therefore, "plot holes" are not a reliable determinant of lying and you risk a "Type 1 error", whereby you reject a valid witness.The blunders in the statements are simply plot holes. Plot holes are common in made up stories.
For example;Revisionists - who will RUN when confronted about explaining their conspiracy - can only view witness testimonies as a binary, a simplistic notion rejected by historians.
Descriptions of Blobel "destroying" corpses with a flamethrower, so that they are "totally eliminate their traces" are taken literally. Historians, indeed anyone with a reasonable level qualification in English language, will recognise the use of hyperbole and that a flamethrower cannot make corpses vanish leaving no trace.As he appears to genuinely believe that multiple human corpses can be “destroyed” with a flamethrower and it can “totally eliminate their traces” in “mass graves”.
By "body disposal" you are of course referring to the retarted "magically disappearing jew / grave" theory."Revisionists" have not provided a remotely plausible alternative explanation. I would say body disposal is far more convincing than having no explanation at all.
It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.
Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be -
LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.
If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have
actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.
Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.
http://thisisaboutscience.com/
