Page 23 of 23

Re: A New Revisionist Interpretation of Operation Reinhardt

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:06 am
by Keen
bombsaway wrote: Wed Oct 16, 2024 12:14 am The mere fact that Malkinia was a stop, does not necessarily mean there was disembarking there, so this is not direct evidence, just as the mere fact of Jews being delivered to "Treblinka" doesn't mean they were killed there.
Well said bombsaway.

There would have to be massive amounts of physical evidence that corroberated the allegations of mass burial, right?

Re: A New Revisionist Interpretation of Operation Reinhardt

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:12 am
by Keen
bombsaway wrote: Wed Oct 16, 2024 7:52 pm If we're talking just about arrivals to Treblinka camp (wherever you may imagine it to be), the Hoefle telegram specifies "recoded arrivals" to Treblinka, 700k.
700,000?

bombsaway, do you deny that the USHMM alleges that 925,000 jews were murdered and buried at Treblinka II?

Re: A New Revisionist Interpretation of Operation Reinhardt

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2025 3:33 am
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:49 am Revisionist standards of evidencing are so poor, that their theories would fail even at a school level of scrutiny.
Says the low IQ liar who claims that this photo of a few bones:

Image

is "evidence" that the remains of 925,000 jews are buried at T II.

I thought all the jews were magically disappeared via burning of the corpses?

These must not be jewish bones then, huh Nessie?

What would you think if the U.S. treasury were to claim that this photo:

Image

was "evidence" that all the gold alleged to be in Fort Knox was really there?