The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Fri Oct 31, 2025 1:08 pm

Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 11:34 pm

Nessie wrote:There are lots of Holocaust denier, social media grifters, earning money attracting attention by making unevidenced and debunked claims about the Holocaust...

HansHill wrote:You are arguing that Holocaust denial is lucrative...

lucrative /loo͞′krə-tĭv/
adjective
1. Producing wealth; profitable.

Nessie wrote:You lie that I claimed denial is lucrative.

wtf?

I keep tellin’ ya: this one suffers from a psychosis.

Muehlenkamp's mental illness, along with his shameless lying and cowardice, is legendary.

.
This isn’t just vitally important info for Americans, but what is being exposed here applies to Canadian, Australian and almost European governments also.

It is info from CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou:

An excellent summary of some of the concerns addressed in this thread (and more):

That video isn't bad Fangers.

I ran across, some stuff, and put it on odysee (post edited and link to channel removed, embedded just an AV presentation using a bitchute link). I ran across this a few months back when researching 'The Great Sedition Trial of 1944'.



This material ties directly in to the subject of this thread because for 'antisemitism' people in America were prosecuted for 'sedition' as 'nazis' because they didn't like the 'jew Deal' or FDR and his jew cabinet.

Their criticism was, protected by the first amendment, ethical and warranted.

.
Q. Is it both “ethical and warranted” to “criticise” and expose Jews both when they operate “as a collective” AND as “individuals” in ways that are immoral, criminal, illegal and destructive?

A: Yes! Absolutely ‘yes’!!

Well then why is almost nobody here engaging with or discussing the erosion of civil liberties in Germany, France, Australia, Britain, etc., based on false claims of protecting jews from ‘hate crimes’??!?

The blatantly zionist-created ‘anti-terrorist’ laws now being enacted in Europe, Australia and the two countries of the North American continent, if allowed to be implemented unchallenged, are going to remove the civil liberties of our children and grandchildren.

Yet people here are more willing to discuss 1942 telephone number books, etc.

CONSIDER:
BECAUSE of the public acquiescence in the deceitful demonisation of National Socialism, citizens in Germany have been unable to protest against the WW2 atrocity propaganda controlling their lives.

BECAUSE of hollowho@x ‘holocaust’ laws Germans to this day are not permitted to defend themselves in courts of law if jews decide they must be tried for questioning their quasi-religious, pseudo-historical, anti-German, racist, holyhoax ‘genocide’ narrative.

Yes, lawyers are still today NOT ALLOWED to defend their clients in court if its concerning the eight-decades old Allies ‘atrocity’ narrative.
Its absurd, but that’s the reality.

If you don’t know and doubt this then investigate the treatment of Lawyer Sylvia Stolz.

And because search engines and the internet are both now controlled by jews and jewish collectives, don’t be surprised if online search engines only gives you sites with justification for this judicial absurdity.

Therefore, here is online material that search-engines won’t take you to that give a factual, objective reporting of her persecution for attempting to defend her client Ernst Zündel.

1. Sylvia was arrested in the courtroom during her defence of the as yet unconvicted, so-called 'holocaust denier' Ernst Zündel… For this she was imprisoned for almost three and a half years, in spite of her having no previous convictions.



2. Zundel Lead Attorney Sylvia Stolz was bodily carried out of the courtroom for insisting that her client had the right to submit exculpatory evidence. Subsequently, Stolz was sentenced to more than three years in prison…



SPEECH FORBIDDEN, EVIDENCE FORBIDDEN, LEGAL DEFENCE FORBIDDEN: THE REALITY OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
On 24th November 2012, dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz appeared at the eighth annual meeting of the "Anti-Censorship Coalition" [Anti-Zensur-Koalition (AZK)] in Chur, Switzerland, where she presented a speech entitled “Sprechverbot, Beweisverbot, Verteidigungsverbot: Die Wirklichkeit der Meinungsfreiheit”.



Now this is the planned situation in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. A law has been introduced to allow criminalisation of lawyers for defending citizens arrested as ‘terrorists’ for peacefully protesting again the zionist-jewish genocide in the middle Eastern occupied territories.

If YOU personally don’t care because you have been duped by zionist rhetoric into hating all ‘Arabs’ and all ‘muslims’, give a thought for your children and grandchildren.

The moment the British government began proscribing political movements as terrorist organisations, rather than just militant groups, it was inevitable that saying factual things, making truthful statements, would become a crime.

And lo behold, here we are.

The Terrorism Act 2000 has a series of provisions that make it difficult to voice or show any kind of support for an organisation proscribed under the legislation, whether it is writing an article or wearing a T-shirt.

Recent attention has focused on Section 13, which is being used to hound thousands of mostly elderly people who have held signs saying: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action”. They now face a terrorism conviction and up to six months in jail.

But an amendment introduced in 2019 to Section 12 of the Act has been largely overlooked, even though it is even more repressive. It makes it a terrorism offence for a person to express “an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation” and in doing so be “reckless” about whether anyone else might be “encouraged to support” the organisation.

It is hard to believe this clause was not inserted specifically to target the watchdog professions: journalists, human rights groups and lawyers. They now face up to 14 years in jail for contravening this provision.

~ Jonathan Cook
https://open.substack.com/pub/jonathanc ... medium=ios

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Mon Dec 22, 2025 4:46 pm The blatantly zionist-created ‘anti-terrorist’ laws now being enacted in Europe, Australia and the two countries of the North American continent, if allowed to be implemented unchallenged, are going to remove the civil liberties of our children and grandchildren.

Yet people here are more willing to discuss 1942 telephone number books, etc.

All of what you address here is important and I agree its crucial to discuss these items. That said, our audience on this forum is limited (not ideal for activism that needs to reach the attention of millions of people, and fairly "niche" given its specific Holocaust-focus).

The importance of discussing phone books is showing the geographic, infrastructural, institutional, labor, etc. layout of areas surrounding 'extermination' operations. In other words, directly relevant to the mission and purpose of this forum.

Activism like that which you're discussing is important but only loosely fits as a topic here.

That said, Sylvia Stolz was discussed frequently at the old CODOH forum. She would often be brought up in threads as a heroine of free speech, having made great sacrifices for the cause of exposing these powers. One of our frequent members there kept her as his profile avatar for several years. She is well-known and widely respected among revisionists.

You are spot-on in the importance of discussing and radically opposing these new subversive laws. Thank you for sharing.