The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Callafangers wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 7:37 am

erichunt420 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 2:32 am So first off - I don’t want to go into the gassing aspect at this time. I believe gassing happened and even now. Don’t waste too much of my time with this now. When I came to this conclusion and realized the Open Debaters didn’t actually want a debate and would lose on the issue, Hannover instabanned me from this forum. I was not able to make a new username. Germar Rudolf hid like a pussy and still does. Hides and makes appearances on the fat Nazi Peinovich another pussy afraid to debate. You have a bubble and echo chamber. Denial is a cult.

Okay, this is pure and literal nonsense and there's another thread here currently which makes this fact crystal-clear. Jake Shields has invited multiple historians to debate Rudolf this week (the debate to be released in a couple days), they repeatedly refused. In other words: you're factually wrong and the shoe is on the other foot. No revisionist is 'afraid to debate'. I believe you know this and it seems you are either lying or, at least, rather confused.

The same goes for your view on 'denial' as some kind of echo chamber, when it is exterminationism literally persecuting and creating laws to ensure they maintain a global 'bubble and echo chamber' on all 'Holocaust' questions. Once again, the shoe is on the other foot, and you are factually incorrect.

You're clearly not on some bold and impressive path to enlightenment either, Eric. Who knows, you may be right about Wiesel (stranger things have happened), but your case so far has appeared to be bizarre ramblings. In the past, you made evidence-based presentations exposing the deceptive patterns of the 'Holocaust', through hard work and impressive research. You now use ALL CAPS and rant about Elie Wiesel and claims that I'm quickly losing confidence you can back up at all. This is weird.

As I have already mentioned, years ago, I was initially curious and open to your reasons for changing your mind about 'gassing' and the like. But your case was void of any sound arguments which I believe could realistically have formed the basis for a natural and logical shift in your understanding of the history, or of the truth. It just has not added up.

For those who have not yet seen/read your withdrawal from revisionism, it is archived, here:

http://archive.is/DoGTn

As already mentioned, most of it is the same-old which can be found from exterminationists on this forum or anywhere else, but you were the first I have seen to put some special emphasis on this particular photograph (one of the first pieces of evidence presented as the rationale for your withdrawal):

forced5.jpg

This photograph shows a woman being held onto by three [Jewish] men who are standing upright. The woman looks emotionally distraught.

Your caption for this photo is "Elderly Jew being forced into Crematorium 5".

The same Eric Hunt who explained to me the absurd lies of the Jewish woman on a 'Spielberg pedestal' fishing out diamonds from her fecal matter for a year and a half, now glances at the above photograph and instantly concludes the woman is "being forced [into a gas chamber]". Case-closed, no further questions.

As I recall pointing out at the old forum:

• Crematoria V was also a morgue.
• When a person's relative (say, a child) died, their body was taken to the morgue.
• If the relative (say, a mother) was especially emotional, she might have to be pulled away or held back from her now-deceased child/relative.
• The three men are standing upright; they are not exerting themselves in any way.
• There is no line of other Jews here waiting to be 'gassed'; just a single woman, you claim was singled-out for 'gassing' (i.e. not aligned with the narrative).

This as "evidence" makes no sense whatsoever, yet you listed it as your top reasons for going from in-depth factual knowledge and reasoning as to how and why:

• The Majdanek gas chamber is a myth
• Massive patterns of lies in key witnesses (e.g. Sonderkommando such as Dario Gabai)
• Fraudulent 'excavations' a la Sturdy-Colls
• and much, much more...

...to "oops, I goofed, deniers are actually full of it". Simply put, this makes no sense.

I do recall Germar sharing his interpretation (on Rizoli's podcast, I think) of what happened between you two; something along the lines that you had certain ideas or expectations of him which he failed to meet or align with, from your perspective. And that after he did not meet your expectations, you were broken by this, in some way (I'm paraphrasing my vague recollection). Moreover, I am aware you were going through some serious personal events in your life at the time of this shift in opinion (I learned this elsewhere). I'm not going to share that here, out of respect, but it altogether seems quite clear that you did not [publicly] change your views based on new findings or interpretations of any kind (your 'withdrawal letter' makes that clear). This does not leave open much possibility other than that you were motivated through some other means.

But who knows. Maybe you do really believe in 'gassing' nowadays, and maybe sincerely. Even if so, this is more so a testament to (and study of) human behavior. Your 180 on this matter has not added any new evidence or interpretations to this topic, which would be strange, coming from you (given how much new evidence/interpretations you were able to present in favor of revisionism, earlier on).

All of this said, I still do appreciate your revisionist work. I know you have made an effort to scrub it from the web (copyright strikes and the like), but it's still around. I still recommend it to those new to revisionism. Some good stuff there, for sure.

I could take them in a handicap match you fools. I would debate both of them at the same time duh

I HAVE THE CODOH WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP BELT.
The Bradley Belt.
Germar has some jabroni title.
Thanks

erichunt420 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:35 am No Josh that is not a debate . That is two jabronis having a dark match I got the belt

You should understand you were tricked. That is literally not a debate. Germar never debates and tricks people into thinking he does or even would

He runs like a little bitch at the sight of a real free speech champ

joshk246 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:39 am

erichunt420 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:35 am No Josh that is not a debate . That is two jabronis having a dark match I got the belt

You should understand you were tricked. That is literally not a debate. Germar never debates and tricks people into thinking he does or even would

He runs like a little bitch at the sight of a real free speech champ

Eric, everything you’ve stated is a contradiction to reality. 4 people pulled out of the debate after they found out it was against Rudolf, they thought it was against shields and then when he said it was against Germar they started ducking. Like I said, make some threads on the debate forums, I’m interested to see if you have any new evidence at all to corroborate your claims.

Also you are an American right Eric?

erichunt420 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:41 am Josh you need to understand I already won the strap at Rumble. Got the belt at mania vs Berg and have held it undefeated for many years.

Germar ran from the debate challenge - this is like the entire point of the article.

And Bradley Smiths fight for radical free speech.

It wasn’t for some German sympathizer of the third reich to try to restore his heroes or whatever the fuck he wants to take issue with that. If he isn’t a sympathizer and he wants to say it in a debate let him do that. I would not want to put words in his mouth. And mislabel anyone. But I know how to expose fakes phonies and frauds. Ever listen to Bob Grant getting a ridiculous caller?

joshk246 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:37 pm So, supposedly 4 historians have pulled out of the Germar Rudolf debate on the Jake Shields podcast. We know how much time the exterminationist's spend on this forum so why have none of you decided to put your money where your mouth is?... On camera.

erichunt420 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:48 am Yes I am American.

I don’t know Jake but will have an email contact up soon and I’ll write him.

But the fact is we already won because Germar will back out if I get in. I’m the Sid Vicious of this shit

joshk246 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 9:00 am

erichunt420 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:48 am Yes I am American.

I don’t know Jake but will have an email contact up soon and I’ll write him.

But the fact is we already won because Germar will back out if I get in. I’m the Sid Vicious of this shit

Cool, obviously I and I don’t think anyone else on this forum has any issue with you so any problems you had on the old one shouldn’t happen now. I’m all for open debate and think it would be great to get you on camera defending your position.

I only ask if you’re an American because, you said in one of your replies… “You could have put the diamonds in a bag up your snatch you dumb cunt”
That is quintessentially a British euphemism “snatch” and “cunt” is very British/Anglo.