Page 3 of 7
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:37 pm
by Keen
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:27 pm
Not all 33 graves contain cremains but most of them.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
And we have yet another low IQ retard who has trouble with yes or no questions.
Let's see if the retard understands the question now.
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:38 pm
by bombsaway
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:37 pm
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:27 pm
Not all 33 graves contain cremains but most of them.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
And we have yet another low IQ retard who has trouble with yes or no questions.
Let's see if the retard understands the question now.
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cremains
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:41 pm
by Keen
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:37 pm
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:27 pm
Not all 33 graves contain cremains but most of them.
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
And we have yet another low IQ retard who has trouble with yes or no questions!
Let's see if the retard understands the question now.
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 3:04 pm
by bombsaway
You're saying the "ashes of a cremated human body" are not human remains? Interesting
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 3:11 pm
by Keen
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 6:40 pm
by bombsaway
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
this is you, they're the same thing IMO . cremains are "ashes of a cremated human body"
so you can play some semantic games and say no human remains were found, whatever dude
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:07 pm
by Callafangers
Keen wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 6:12 pm
Nessie, would you tell us what this is:
Wait... this is hilarious. What
is this? Nessie (or Keen, or anyone) please do tell us/me what this is.
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:24 pm
by Stubble
That's one of the only maps of Belzec.
It looks like a fictional fantasy map from a Tolkien novel because....
Well, you know.
http://www.deathcamps.org/belzec/maps.html
The Reder Map
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:58 pm
by Keen
Look at the cornered rat squirm!
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 6:40 pm
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
this is you, they're the same thing IMO . cremains are "ashes of a cremated human body"
so you can play some semantic games and say no human remains were found, whatever dude
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 8:04 pm
by bombsaway
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 7:58 pm
Look at the cornered rat squirm!
bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 6:40 pm
The question didn't ask about "cremains" it asked about "human remains."
this is you, they're the same thing IMO . cremains are "ashes of a cremated human body"
so you can play some semantic games and say no human remains were found, whatever dude
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
what are human remains to you lol? how do you define this. would be necessary to answering any question from you
what I am understanding from you is if you burn a human and dump the ashes into grave, this is not human remains.
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 8:57 pm
by Keen
Look at the cornered rat squirm!
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 10:37 pm
by bombsaway
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 8:57 pm
Look at the cornered rat squirm!
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
There's no squirming because I think you are mentally ill and feel sorry for you, nevertheless see this post
viewtopic.php?p=16220#p16220
Revisionists concede that burnt human remains were found
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 10:57 pm
by Keen
Look at the cornered rat squirm!
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 11:10 pm
by bombsaway
Keen wrote: ↑Tue Sep 23, 2025 10:57 pm
Look at the cornered rat squirm!
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway, using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Yes,
"Finally, only occasionally were ashes mixed with soil found, and only very rarely any human remains."
-Holocaust Encylopedia
https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/instr ... elzec/403/
Re: Nessie's epic fail on Belzec
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2025 11:23 pm
by Keen
Look at the cornered rat squirm!
Look at the lying, low IQ retard run!
bombsaway,
using your own standard of proof:
Did the "study" prove that each and every one of the 33 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" actually contained human remians - Yes. - or - No. - ??