The majority of the evidence from eyewitnesses and the vast majority of the documentary, physical and circumstantial evidence comes from Nazi sources and is confirmed by them.Archie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 2:00 pmHolocaust historians have swallowed (or willingly gone along with) Allied and Zionist war-time propaganda and have supported this with dubious sources.
Revisionists have the job of separating out fact from fiction, to the extent possible after so many decades of lies.
You dishonestly suggest the evidence is Allied and Zionist propaganda, to distract from revisionist inability to revise the history of the Holocaust, with contemporaneous evidence, producing a chronology of events around the arrest of millions of Jews and what subsequently happened to them. That is why Holocaust revision is badly named, as revisionists cannot revise the existing history. Some have tried, but their attempts are laughable and contradict each other.
As for revisionists separating fact from fiction, their inexperience with and disinterest in the norms of witness behaviour, memory and recall, and reliance on the logical fallacy of argument from incredulity, means that they are unable to complete that task with any reliability. It does not even cross their minds that they have come up with the extraordinary result of 100% of witnesses who worked at an AR camp, Chelmno or A-B Krema lied. Hundreds of witnesses, who, no matter their circumstances, told a pack of lies about gassing and never let slip what really took place. Then there are the millions of people who are proven to have been to those places, supposedly not killed, but they play dead, pretending to have been killed in the gas chambers and then, for an inexplicable reason revisionist cannot explain, were hidden by the Nazis till the end of the war.