Where Myths Meet Their Demise
https://codohforum.com/
This can't be a real question? Nessie: If things are not believable, they by definition fail to meet our expectations of sitting "beyond reasonable doubt", and are therefore regarded with suspicion and attract criticism.
BA - I've already said in this thread that CO gassings under the T4 programme are at least plausible, if not very practical. If you want to discuss it with me in Stubble's absence, then by all means.bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:37 pm Sure, I'll respond to this post in a few days. Until then I would ask that people don't move forward too far in the chronology
In the meantime I might check out the links I provided previously and here's a book https://oceanofpdf.com/authors/michael- ... -download/
It is the question I have to ask the most, because revisionists dodge it the most, since their incredulity is what their denial is based on. They find the Holocaust too incredible to believe, so they argue it cannot have happened.
So, you are saying that it did not happen. How is your disbelief it happened, proof that it did not happen?Nessie: If things are not believable, they by definition fail to meet our expectations of sitting "beyond reasonable doubt", and are therefore regarded with suspicion and attract criticism.
https://legaldictionary.net/beyond-a-reasonable-doubt/
Is your acceptance T4 gassings are plausible, evidence to prove those gassings happened?HansHill wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 2:58 pmBA - I've already said in this thread that CO gassings under the T4 programme are at least plausible, if not very practical. If you want to discuss it with me in Stubble's absence, then by all means.bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:37 pm Sure, I'll respond to this post in a few days. Until then I would ask that people don't move forward too far in the chronology
In the meantime I might check out the links I provided previously and here's a book https://oceanofpdf.com/authors/michael- ... -download/
I'm interested in how you get from T4 gassings to AR gassings of a completely different method.
Something being "not practical" makes it implausible. Remember the evidence too. It isn't just speculation on the part of historians, there is a large body of documentary and witness evidence pointing to T4 related gassings. By questioning whether these occurred you are in a sense asserting a conspiracy to fabricate this evidence.HansHill wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 2:58 pmBA - I've already said in this thread that CO gassings under the T4 programme are at least plausible, if not very practical. If you want to discuss it with me in Stubble's absence, then by all means.bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:37 pm Sure, I'll respond to this post in a few days. Until then I would ask that people don't move forward too far in the chronology
In the meantime I might check out the links I provided previously and here's a book https://oceanofpdf.com/authors/michael- ... -download/
I'm interested in how you get from T4 gassings to AR gassings of a completely different method.
Nessie, is your grip on reality really so tenuous as to think my opinion about an event would actually, really and truly have an effect on it's occurring or not occurring?