The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Archie wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 6:06 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 5:54 pm The slots are a more reasonable mechanism than a merry go round, but no I don't think either are definitively contradicted by Kula's testimony.

You are literally the only person on the planet who believes in the slots and slopes nonsense.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2026 3:39 am I hardly believe my design is actually what existed in reality - it's pure speculation, so if you want to attack it on those grounds that's legit. But I've said this many times before. It's possible the methods changed, it's possible the testimonies were confused to some degree leading to improper interpretations, it's possible mechanisms were left out. I would never offer my diagram up as serious history. It was an exercise in showing general feasibility.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2026 3:39 am I hardly believe my design is actually what existed in reality - it's pure speculation,

I would never offer my diagram up as serious history. It was an exercise in showing general feasibility.

Archie wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 8:32 pm
If these things existed in physical reality, then the primary source descriptions, particularly that of Kula, should be essentially correct and you shouldn't need to make up something else.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 9:23 pm Kula's description very well might be correct and the whole column was extracted. In that case Tauber would have likely witnessed a different method or made an error in his error description, it's all possible.

bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 10:34 pm But why is this a problem?

HansHill wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 11:04 pm

bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 10:34 pm But why is this a problem?

Because the defense offered up by Markiewicz, Green, Van Pelt, and by extension every other Holocaust proponent against revisionists, hinges centrally on the device to operate in this fashion.

The pellets MUST be delivered, retained, and retrieved using this mechanism. Failure on any of these points has direct repercussions on HCN exposure time and the chemical analyses, as well as execution times, poison gas and body removal.

Stop pretending this is an incidental point that we are nitpicking over - everything hinges on this mechanism and we (you included) cannot explain it.

Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Fri Jul 17, 2026 7:30 pm ..and the size of the device they are supposed to go into is known (a 15 mm gap according to Kula's trial testimony)

HansHill wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2026 11:04 pm Because the defense offered up by Markiewicz, Green, Van Pelt, and by extension every other Holocaust proponent against revisionists, hinges centrally on the device to operate in this fashion.

These wire-mesh columns allowed not only the easy introduction of the cyanide-bearing cubes of calcium sulfate, but also their quick removal. The cubes continued to give up their hydrogen cyanide even after the poisoning process had ended after 20 minutes and no one was alive any more. The removal of these Erko cubes was essential for the smooth and continuous operation of the killing station. Zyklon B having been developed as a disinfestation agent, the duration of the evaporation had been fixed at 24 hours. Nits are difficult to get rid of and must be exposed to the cyanide for a long time. People, on the other hand, die quickly. With fresh transports arriving day by day, the SS insisted on the gas chambers being accessible right away after the death of all victims. The architects must have concluded that the removal of the still active Erko cubes would facilitate the cleaning-up operations.

From Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch Giftgas, p.210, as quoted and presumably translated by Carlo Mattogno in Inside the Gas Chambers, pp.109-110.