Page 12 of 12
Re: Flaws and Limitations in Chemistry of Auschwitz
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2025 8:19 pm
by Archie
Nessie wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 7:49 pm
All that shows, is that no one is absolutely sure about the conditions inside the gas chambers and why residues are lower than found in the delousing chambers. Chemists and the rest of us can hypothesis till the cows come home. Either way, not knowing, does not prove there were no gas chambers. You can pretend all you like that you know for sure, but you don't. No one does.
Okay, so if Holohoaxsters disagree and contradict themselves all over the place that's fine, but if revisionists have any disagreement on anything that automatically discredits revisionism in its entirety. Got it.
Re: Flaws and Limitations in Chemistry of Auschwitz
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2025 8:32 pm
by HansHill
Archie wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 8:19 pm
Nessie wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 7:49 pm
All that shows, is that no one is absolutely sure about the conditions inside the gas chambers and why residues are lower than found in the delousing chambers. Chemists and the rest of us can hypothesis till the cows come home. Either way, not knowing, does not prove there were no gas chambers. You can pretend all you like that you know for sure, but you don't. No one does.
Okay, so if Holohoaxsters disagree and contradict themselves all over the place that's fine, but if revisionists have any disagreement on anything that automatically discredits revisionism in its entirety. Got it.
But Archie don't you see, those are honest to goodness mistakes! It's perfectly normal for an eyewitness to
accidentally fabricate that they were electrocuted, masturbated and nuked. Happens all the time! Round here we just call it a wild weekend.
Re: Flaws and Limitations in Chemistry of Auschwitz
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2025 8:46 pm
by Stubble
