"Holocaust orthodoxy" has been reached by historians, because of the evidence. It is that evidence that maintains the belief of the historians, rather than any "persecution" etc. If a historian diverts from what is evidenced, and they cannot revise the history with evidence, then they can find themselves ostracised. That is not because of "persecution" etc, it is because they have made unevidenced claims.Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Aug 20, 2025 9:01 am ...
BOTTOM LINE:
Holocaust orthodoxy IS comparable to flat-earth orthodoxy at the time of Copernicus and Galileo. It is similar in that it maintains belief amongst the ignorant masses by persecution, censorship and quasi-religious, pseudo-historical tyranny.
...
So-called revisionism, is variously driven by anti-Semitism, conspiracy and hate. It is not evidence based, proven by the fact that so-called revisionists cannot even agree on a revision, evidencing what really happened. That is why it has been made illegal in some countries. Fake news and conspiracies have become a major problem, causing people to be driven by what they want to believe, and to ignore normal standards of evidencing.