Details on the alleged Nazi resettlement of Jews action.

[Callafangers]

Callafangers;

viewtopic.php?p=26633#p26633

Germany, official records:

"They [Jews] were literally resettled."

What department was responsible? Who were the senior Nazis running that department? What was the operational name of the programme?

The Final Solution to the Jewish Question

[Nessie]

Callafangers;

viewtopic.php?p=26633#p26633

Germany, official records:

"They [Jews] were literally resettled."

What department was responsible? Who were the senior Nazis running that department? What was the operational name of the programme?

The Final Solution to the Jewish Question

Can you evidence the Final Solution in operation in 1944? Who were the senior Nazis running it and where were they based?

[HansHill]

Callafangers;

viewtopic.php?p=26633#p26633



What department was responsible? Who were the senior Nazis running that department? What was the operational name of the programme?

The Final Solution to the Jewish Question

Can you evidence the Final Solution in operation in 1944? Who were the senior Nazis running it and where were they based?

HH vol 28 section 7.10 contains such examples. Please read it before replying with further slop (I know you won't)

[Nessie]

The Final Solution to the Jewish Question

Can you evidence the Final Solution in operation in 1944? Who were the senior Nazis running it and where were they based?

HH vol 28 section 7.10 contains such examples. Please read it before replying with further slop (I know you won't)

If you asked me for evidence and I referred you to a section in a book, you would call that slop. HH Vol 28, does not have a section 7.10. It ends at 7.9, page 293, followed by the conclusion.

https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the ... or-belzec/

Either directly answer the questions, or admit you have no answers.

[HansHill]

This would never happen, because no offense, I probably don't think I would ever come to you looking for information of any kind.

"call that slop"

Well maybe, but I would also call it attempted time wasting and lack of any sort of basic sense of initiative, proactivity, ownership, curiosity, good faith search for knowledge.

This also coming from the same guy who recently called out another user for the same thing:

New member;

viewtopic.php?p=26562#p26562

I've read so much literature that in this case I cannot remember where I heard it, only that I remember reading that the shoes were actually donated by caring German citizens for the Jews in the work camps.

This may or may not be true but it fits with what I know about our people.

So speaks someone who clearly has no research or investigatory skills.

So off you go, on your bike, review the MGK tome you've been referred to (which AFAIK) has been unaddressed by your precious HC bloggers.

[Nessie]

This would never happen, because no offense, I probably don't think I would ever come to you looking for information of any kind.

"call that slop"

Well maybe, but I would also call it attempted time wasting and lack of any sort of basic sense of initiative, proactivity, ownership, curiosity, good faith search for knowledge.

So called revisionists claim no mass murder of millions of Jews arrested by the Nazis and their Allies, 1939-45. Instead, they were accommodated or resettled. In my search for knowledge, I would like to know about that programme.

This also coming from the same guy who recently called out another user for the same thing:

New member;

viewtopic.php?p=26562#p26562

I've read so much literature that in this case I cannot remember where I heard it, only that I remember reading that the shoes were actually donated by caring German citizens for the Jews in the work camps.

This may or may not be true but it fits with what I know about our people.

So speaks someone who clearly has no research or investigatory skills.

So off you go, on your bike, review the MGK tome you've been referred to (which AFAIK) has been unaddressed by your precious HC bloggers.

I am asking you and so far you said the programme was the Final Solution. But, who was running that programme in 1944, where from and what evidence can you provide?

[Keen]

Either directly answer the questions, or admit you have no answers.

viewtopic.php?t=674

[Keen]

So called revisionists claim no mass murder of millions of Jews arrested by the Nazis and their Allies, 1939-45. Instead, they were accommodated or resettled. In my search for knowledge, I would like to know about that programme.

You have already come to the "conclusion" that 2.145 million jews were murdered and buried at BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II alone - in 100 specifically identified "huge mass graves."

So why are you trying to turn a supposed "solved" murder case into an unsolved missing persons case?

nessie:

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.

I am both a trained historian and police officer.

The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.

They were not full cremations to ashes at the AR camps either.

Proof, from multiple sources of corroborating evidence, has been produced.

You ignore corroboration. You deny the gathered evidence.

Claiming that multiple pits found by geophysics in the same part of the camp that witnesses state the main mass graves were dug, is not corroborating evidence to prove mass graves, is denial of reality.

The mass graves have not disappeared.

As it stands, there have been two main archaeological surveys of TII.

There is a ton of archaeological evidence proving mass graves.

They are still there. I can point to them in the ground.

No matter what the claim is, the burden of proof is on the claimant.

I have never had any issue with accepting the burden of proof.

There is no circumstance in which I reverse the burden of proof.

If you make a claim, it is up to you to prove it. If I make one, it is up to me.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

[Keen]

Reversal of the burden of proof.

Exactly.

As well, the lying POS is trying to take two positions in an argument so it can speak out of both sides of its mouth.

And then it has the audacity to demand:

Either directly answer the questions, or admit you have no answers.

I hope that any "revisionist" who engages this POS in this thread has the sense to demand that nessie answer some form of the following:

Is it - True. - or - False. - that you claim to already know, beyond any reasonable doubt, the final destination of these so-called "resettled jews" - ??

Always remember, the very fact that the mentally ill HC cult members have to ask this question proves that they are tacitly admitting that their statements about "proven huge mass graves" are lies.

If they knew where the alleged millions of so-called "missing jews" actually ended up, they wouldn't be asking where they went.

[borjastick]

Totally agree with you Keen but you must see what he is up to. His whole point in endless debates and petty arguments about slightly less than f-ck all is to tie us up in perpetual nonsense discussions and disagreements on minutiae so that we don't discuss the huge and very hairy elephants in the room.

When you are arguing about the painting of a room after claimed gassings you are not arguing about whether gassings and millions of people were gassed at all, if you get my drift.

He loves this kind of shite and irrelevant bollocks. Back in the 70s in London the jews were very prominent in the promotion of blacks and black rights and standing against the British National Party (BNP) who wanted all blacks repatriated etc. Why? Not because jews cared about blacks, no no not at all, but because while everyone got worked up about racism and anti black marches etc they were not looking at the joos.

[Nessie]

...He loves this kind of shite and irrelevant bollocks...

If the history of the Jews during WWII is to be revised, so proving the mass murders alleged did not take place, then basics, such as who was running the resettlement operation in 1944, what was it called and where are documents pertaining to it, are not irrelevant. They are essential.

Otherwise, all you have is denial, such as denying there is sufficient evidence of mass graves for hundreds of thousands of people at each of the AR camps. Denying hundreds of thousands of Jews proven to have arrived at TII, were killed there and then failing to evidence what happened there and where those Jews were in 1944, is not genuine history. It is an inconclusive non-history, which deserves to be derided as utter shite.

I can provide corroborating evidence of mass gassings, graves and cremations at TII. No one has provided corroborating evidence of a different process taking place there and the Jews who arrived on mass transports, also leaving on such transports.

The contempt with which you treat the norms of investigating historical events, prove you are not genuine and you are here to sow hatred against Jews. You would not approach any other historical event, the way you approach the Holocaust.

[Keen]

If the history of the Jews during WWII is to be revised, so proving the mass murders alleged did not take place

There it is again, trying to dodge its burden of proof:

nessie:

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.

I am both a trained historian and police officer.

The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.

They were not full cremations to ashes at the AR camps either.

Proof, from multiple sources of corroborating evidence, has been produced.

You ignore corroboration. You deny the gathered evidence.

Claiming that multiple pits found by geophysics in the same part of the camp that witnesses state the main mass graves were dug, is not corroborating evidence to prove mass graves, is denial of reality.

The mass graves have not disappeared.

As it stands, there have been two main archaeological surveys of TII.

There is a ton of archaeological evidence proving mass graves.

They are still there. I can point to them in the ground.

No matter what the claim is, the burden of proof is on the claimant.

I have never had any issue with accepting the burden of proof.

There is no circumstance in which I reverse the burden of proof.

If you make a claim, it is up to you to prove it. If I make one, it is up to me.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

[Keen]

I can provide corroborating evidence of mass gassings, graves and cremations at TII. No one has provided corroborating evidence of a different process taking place there and the Jews who arrived on mass transports, also leaving on such transports.

LIAR.

If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

[Keen]

all you have is denial, such as denying there is sufficient evidence of mass graves for hundreds of thousands of people at each of the AR camps. Denying hundreds of thousands of Jews proven to have arrived at TII, were killed there and then failing to evidence what happened there and where those Jews were in 1944, is not genuine history. It is an inconclusive non-history, which deserves to be derided as utter shite.

“HUGE MASS GRAVES” are easily identifiable physical entities.

I refuse to believe in the existence of any physical entity that I am not allowed to see.

If you want me to believe, then simply: Show me that which you allege I deny.

BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

Are the remains of 2.145 million Jews really buried in the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves?

(The labeling of asking this legitimate adjudicable question as “hate / antisemitic” is your first clue that they do not want you to know what the answer is.)

OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.

Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be - LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.

...

A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)

https://thisisaboutscience.com/

What are you waiting for nessie?

What are you so afraid of?

[Nessie]

That the deniers here are going all out to deflect from the lack of any evidence of the alleged Nazis resettlement of Jews action, proves that they are not serious about any genuine investigation. The pretence that there is no evidence to prove mass graves for hundreds of thousands at the AR camps is comical and also quite sad, that some can be so deluded.

Action Reinhard, the Final Solution and Action Hoess are all proven to not be resettlement programmes. Instead, they were actions to send Jews, by their millions, to specific camps, where the majority were killed. The Nazis cremated remains, to make body counts and establishing the cause of death impossible.