Where Myths Meet Their Demise
https://codohforum.com/
This lying muppet has just lied yet again.
The lying, mentally ill POS can't even show the remains of two people at T II, much less 800,000.
HansHill, if you would like to see what remains Colls discovered at Treblinka, watch the following video from the 37:40 mark to the 42:40 mark.
The way you misrepresent the evidence, is why you fall for the Holocaust denial hoax. There have been many crimes where the criminals have destroyed evidence. That destruction then becomes part of the evidence of the crime, as it is a criminal act to destroy it. An example of destroyed evidence is TII. Only one building was left, and the rest were not just demolished, they were buried. The site was in part planted over and that part is where multiple pits and cremated human remains have been found. The only documentation pertaining to the camp that survived, are transport records that were created by people who worked outwith the camp, but saw or sent the transports to the camp.
That is a bare faced lie. If there was the same volume of evidence, that Jews had been mass murdering Germans, you would accept that as proof. You lie about the evidence of mass murder, to deflect from the lack of evidence of mass survival.There is no evidence to support the accusations regarding The Bug River Camps. The alleged scale is absolutely untenable. If the scale is false, the extermination claim collapses as one is contingent on the other.
The various archives, such as Bad Arolsen, contain the records of who was arrested and sent to camps. For millions, evidence of their existence under the Nazis, ended at an AR camp, Chelmno or Birkenau.It gets worse still, we don't even know who the alleged victims are supposed to have been. We have only a chart which is pointed to and voices that say 'it was (x) many [usually some variation of 6,000,000]'.
The plain truth is that there is insufficient physical evidence to support the orthodox thesis, hence SanityCheck had to pivot to the 'Oregon Trail' theory of Aktion Reinhardt (notice there is a 't' in that, Aktion Reinhardt).
The mass graves have not disappeared. Instead, their form was changed. Instead of neatly delineated pits containing piles of countable corpses, they left often irregular pits filled with ash, cremains and larger bits of bone. Details of what they left are in the reports in this thread, that Archie refused to left me update, because he also wants to pretend that there is a lack of evidence of the mass graves.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Jul 09, 2026 6:03 pm ....
When I tried to address this before, both bombsaway and Nessie implied that I was strawmanning the orthodoxy. I'm not. The convention among most orthodox historians is indeed that ths nazis were somehow able to pull off the magic disappearing mass grave trick, and, that they made the operation happen with no 1) plan 2) budget 3) timetable via telepathy.
There is a Hitler signed document ordering the start of the euthanasia programme. There are multiple documents about the start of the mass shootings and the Einsatzgruppen. Then there are documents about the setting up of AR. They all pertain to the Final Solution, which has a smoking gun with the Wannsee Minutes.In the absence of any order to start an extermination program, testimony that there was once an order to end it is used as evidence of it having existed. It is important to note that no copies have ever been produced, even the one you would think the 'witness' would have kept for himself.
Himmler wrote in 1941 that Jews were to be exterminated as partisans.Hans Frank at Nuremberg talks about having asked Adolf Hitler if there were executions going on at the Bug River Camps. Hitler bluntly responded, yes, of partisans.
You should rely on evidence, rather than your biased, distorted opinion.In my opinion, that is the extent of the genocide of the jews at the Bug River Camps. The Germans in Aktion Reinhardt and under the Einsatzgruppe also seem to have handled that operation with 'kid gloves'. They missed so damn many people they should have swept up an executed, outright, given their charter.
They were not left alive, they escaped.Look at Sobibor. They left a Soviet POW alive, a POW who was also involved with the partisan resistance. The exact demographic which the operations were targeting. At Treblinka II, they left a known communist propagandist with prewar recorded involvement in subversion and publishing, the one and only humble carpenter Wiernik. This list can go on and on.
Can you say what a "proper" investigation would look like?The scale and scope of killing operations in the East, during the execution of a war, have been greatly exaggerated. If things had really been 'as claimed' there would be a lot more evidence, and, the people who would have known would have known, they would not have been gobsmacked by Hoess's testimony after he had been made pliant in the London Cage...
If we are generous and we assume that every hole at these sites is a 'huge mass grave', there is room to accommodate roughly 10% of the claimed dead. Is that tragic? Of course, war is a protracted tragedy for all involved. It isn't the bill of goods we have been sold however.
When proper investigations of these sites are eventually carried out, I won't be surprised to learn that the dead were dispatched with a hot lead injection, and not via electric floors in hermetically sealed chlorine homicidal gas chambers or with exotic war gasses that allowed the condemned to walk into the mass graves before dying.
Link to the evidence here;
Could you please go into more detail about how all that evidence dodges the challenge?
Liar.
There is the "magically disappearing jew" story again!
nessie:
The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.
ALL the mass graves dug by the Nazis, AND the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.
The evidence;Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2026 11:51 amCould you please go into more detail about how all that evidence dodges the challenge?
Are you suggesting that because I cannot physically show you mass graves, where 800,000 corpses can be individually counted, such as the mass graves at Katyn, that means I cannot prove mass graves?
Does not support the claim.pilgrimofdark wrote: ↑Sat Nov 15, 2025 2:27 pm A few more Treblinka maps that DeathCamps.org doesn't have.
Their "KUDLIK, WIERNIK, TRAUTSOLT MAP" from Oboz stracen w Treblince was revised in 1946 in Obóz zagłady Treblinka with more details and revisions to the language in the map key:
- full reprt here
There's also this map from the Ringelblum Archive, date "After 07.1942." The version on the archive's website is much larger.
And this one, from the 1964-1965 trial of Kurt Franz, reproduced in Chad Gibbs's dissertation "Against that Darkness: Revolt at Treblinka."
DeathCamps.org really needs an update or successor. It's not on HTTPS, which might be the reason their images can't be embedded here.
Because the only thing he can show you actually proves the lying POS wrong:
nessie:
A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.nessie, how many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?
nessie's answer:
12 - G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.
