Page 2 of 2

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2025 6:55 pm
by Keen
bombsaway:
The issue with revisionism is not that you haven't proven "resettlement" comprehensively or in its entirety, it's that you haven't evidenced a single aspect of it.
Keen:
We will start this debate with bombsaway telling us all where he thinks the jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up.
Go ahead bombsaway.

We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the jews were resettled.

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2025 7:00 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:39 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:07 pm
bombsaway wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 6:02 pm

Bro the thread is apparently "on the resettlement issue" but what Keen is asking me about has nothing to do with resettlement, because obviously I don't think resettlement happened. This is why I think you guys are deranged.
Seriously?!?!? :o

You seriously think that? :?

Bro, he’s asking you to explain where YOU believe ‘they’ went.
That is a question he knows how bombsaway will answer.
That’s OBVIOUSLY NOT asking you to discuss “resettlement”.
Which means you are accidentally revealing the true intent Keen has, which is to discuss mass graves, not resettlement.
You really didn’t understand that?
I’m genuinely amazed if you really couldn’t comprehend such a simple thing.

I assume Keen is anticipating you will say ‘they’ went into the ground at specific places.
Obviously, and that will then result in a series of questions from Keen about the mass graves.
And I also assume he has questions prepared for this reply from you.

If you as a long-time holocaust believer, defender and debater, genuinely did NOT understand this, then as someone interested in human psychology I suggest YOUR response above has only two explanations.
And I think these apply to ANYONE and EVERYONE who has become familiar with the actual details of the holocaust narrative yet continue to deny the blatant flaws and physical impoosibilities that form the core of its story.
The two explanations are these.
Your avoidance in order to defend the racist, anti-German, atrocity propaganda of the mass-gassing ‘holocaust’ allegation, is derived from either:
a.) limited intellectual capacity (stupid)
or
b.) devious debating tactic (dishonest).

(Both related to psychology (your preferred subject). :D )

It usually is a combination of both a.) and b.)
In your case, I don’t think a.) applies, so conclude it is b.). ;)
You are showing limited understanding of Keen's supposed debates and deferring back to your preferred tactic of questioning the intellect of your opponent.

Keen has already done enough to prove he is not interested in a genuine debate. He wants to control and for people to answer his questions only.
As long as the craven liar Nessie is chiming in here, let's ask him to do the same:

Nessie, go ahead and tell us all where your think the jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up.

We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the jews were resettled.

Go ahead Nessie.

Re: The bombsaway vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:24 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:39 pm Keen has already done enough to prove he is not interested in a genuine debate.
Nessie, If you can show me exactly were one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently killed ended up, I'll show you where one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently not killed ended up - deal?

Re: The bombsaway vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:47 pm
by Keen
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:07 pm Your [Nessie] avoidance in order to defend the racist, anti-German, atrocity propaganda of the mass-gassing ‘holocaust’ allegation, is derived from either:
a.) limited intellectual capacity (stupid)
or
b.) devious debating tactic (dishonest).

(Both related to psychology (your preferred subject). :D )

It usually is a combination of both a.) and b.)
In your case, I don’t think a.) applies, so conclude it is b.). ;)
I say it's mostly due to a lmited intellectual capacity.

Re: The bombsaway vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:00 am
by Wahrheitssucher
Keen wrote: Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:47 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:07 pm Your [Nessie] avoidance in order to defend the racist, anti-German, atrocity propaganda of the mass-gassing ‘holocaust’ allegation, is derived from either:
a.) limited intellectual capacity (stupid)
or
b.) devious debating tactic (dishonest).

Both related to psychology (your preferred subject). :D

It usually is a combination of both a.) and b.)
In your case, I don’t think a.) applies, so conclude it is b.). ;)
I say it's mostly due to a limited intellectual capacity.
I was referring to Bombsaway.

The person you named has over many years demonstrated not just b.) but that they have deep mental problems.

DEFINITION:
Someone who has a severely disordered mind, cannot discern reality and who is unable to think clearly and sensibly, can be described as insane.

That definition applies to the person you named. They have shown over many years that they are quite unable to discern reality regarding the shoah shibbolith.

Image

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:17 am
by Nessie
Keen knows that bombsaway and I say that the vast majority of Jews transported to the AR camps, Chelmno and Ponary, were murdered and buried at those places, in mass graves, that were then subject to exhumations, cremations and reburial.

He wants to concentrate on that and not answer any questions about supposed resettlement. He then states "We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the Jews were resettled.", which applies to him as well. So, now he knows where we say the Jews went, before we can progress, he needs to state specific locations where Jews were resettled.

In the same way we can say c800,000 were buried at TII, c90,000 at Ponary, etc, he needs to say that so many Jews were settled at and give the locations. Unless he does that, there cannot be any debate on resettlement. I expect him to fail and become abusive.

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:10 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:17 am Keen knows that bombsaway and I say that the vast majority of Jews transported to the AR camps, Chelmno and Ponary, were murdered and buried at those places, in mass graves, that were then subject to exhumations, cremations and reburial.

He wants to concentrate on that and not answer any questions about supposed resettlement. He then states "We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the Jews were resettled.", which applies to him as well. So, now he knows where we say the Jews went, before we can progress, he needs to state specific locations where Jews were resettled.

In the same way we can say c800,000 were buried at TII, c90,000 at Ponary, etc, he needs to say that so many Jews were settled at and give the locations. Unless he does that, there cannot be any debate on resettlement. I expect him to fail and become abusive.
Nessie, If you can show me exactly were one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently killed ended up, I'll show you where one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently not killed ended up - deal?

Now let's watch as Nessie squirms and tries to avoid what he has been challenged to do.

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:17 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:17 am In the same way we can say c800,000 were buried at TII
:lol: Notice how Nessie says "were" and not are.

That's his "magically disappearing jew theory" language.

Nessie, is it - True. - or - False. - that the USHMM alleges that 925,000 jews ARE currently buried at Treblinka?

Re: The bombsaway vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:36 pm
by Keen
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 8:00 am
Keen wrote: Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:47 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Thu Aug 21, 2025 12:07 pm Your [Nessie] avoidance in order to defend the racist, anti-German, atrocity propaganda of the mass-gassing ‘holocaust’ allegation, is derived from either:
a.) limited intellectual capacity (stupid)
or
b.) devious debating tactic (dishonest).

Both related to psychology (your preferred subject). :D

It usually is a combination of both a.) and b.)
In your case, I don’t think a.) applies, so conclude it is b.). ;)
I say it's mostly due to a limited intellectual capacity.
I was referring to Bombsaway.

The person you named has over many years demonstrated not just b.) but that they have deep mental problems.

DEFINITION:
Someone who has a severely disordered mind, cannot discern reality and who is unable to think clearly and sensibly, can be described as insane.

That definition applies to the person you named. They have shown over many years that they are quite unable to discern reality regarding the shoah shibbolith.

Image
:lol:

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2025 6:53 am
by Wahrheitssucher
Keen wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:17 pm
Nessie wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:17 am In the same way we can say c800,000 were buried at TII
:lol: Notice how Nessie says "were" and not ‘are’.

That's his "magically disappearing jew theory" language.
Oh yes!
How fascinating.

A freudian slip, perhaps. A subliminal admission that this HolyH believer actually KNOWS in reality they ‘are’ not there.

Well spotted! :)

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2025 7:22 am
by Nessie
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Sun Aug 24, 2025 6:53 am
Keen wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:17 pm
Nessie wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:17 am In the same way we can say c800,000 were buried at TII
:lol: Notice how Nessie says "were" and not ‘are’.

That's his "magically disappearing jew theory" language.
Oh yes!
How fascinating.

A freudian slip, perhaps. A subliminal admission that this HolyH believer actually KNOWS in reality they ‘are’ not there.

Well spotted! :)
From the same post;

"Keen knows that bombsaway and I say that the vast majority of Jews transported to the AR camps, Chelmno and Ponary, were murdered and buried at those places, in mass graves, that were then subject to exhumations, cremations and reburial."

Re: The bombsaway / Nessie vs Keen debate on the resettlement issue

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2025 7:36 am
by Nessie
Keen wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 4:10 pm
Nessie wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:17 am Keen knows that bombsaway and I say that the vast majority of Jews transported to the AR camps, Chelmno and Ponary, were murdered and buried at those places, in mass graves, that were then subject to exhumations, cremations and reburial.

He wants to concentrate on that and not answer any questions about supposed resettlement. He then states "We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the Jews were resettled.", which applies to him as well. So, now he knows where we say the Jews went, before we can progress, he needs to state specific locations where Jews were resettled.

In the same way we can say c800,000 were buried at TII, c90,000 at Ponary, etc, he needs to say that so many Jews were settled at and give the locations. Unless he does that, there cannot be any debate on resettlement. I expect him to fail and become abusive.
Nessie, If you can show me exactly were one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently killed ended up, I'll show you where one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently not killed ended up - deal?

Now let's watch as Nessie squirms and tries to avoid what he has been challenged to do.
The first question was, from the OP;

"We will start this debate with bombsaway telling us all where he thinks the jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up."

Keen then edited and added me into the thread and asked;

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14708#p14708

"Nessie, go ahead and tell us all where your think the jews who were sent to Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II ended up.

We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the jews were resettled.

Go ahead Nessie."

He did not wait for an answer to that and in the next post demanded;

"Nessie, If you can show me exactly were one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently killed ended up, I'll show you where one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently not killed ended up - deal?"

I answered the original question here;

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14758#p14758

"Keen knows that bombsaway and I say that the vast majority of Jews transported to the AR camps, Chelmno and Ponary, were murdered and buried at those places, in mass graves, that were then subject to exhumations, cremations and reburial."

I then pointed out that he had said;

"We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the Jews were resettled."

This is a thread, he started about resettlement. But, as predicted, he is being dishonest, his intention was never to discuss resettlement. His intention is to, yet again, in yet another thread, discuss the burials, or alleged lack of them.

"Nessie, If you can show me exactly were one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently killed ended up, I'll show you where one jew who was sent to Treblinka II and subsequently not killed ended up - deal?"

He demands control of the so-called debate and he will keep it about burials, not resettlement. This is why debate is not possible with him.

"Now let's watch as Nessie squirms and tries to avoid what he has been challenged to do."

I see you constantly squirming to avoid actual debate, that you do not have control over, where you also answer questions. You have started a thread on resettlement. You said it is not possible to have a debate without knowing where Jews were resettled. But he squirms and runs away from answering his own question. So, again;

"We can't have a debate on the resettlement issue if we don't know where you think the Jews were resettled."

How can we debate resettlement, if we don't know where you think the Jews were resettled?