The CODOH Revisionist Forum

I'm examining alleged Belzec grave #11 at the moment - trying to find any evidence that it actually exists.

I'm trying to find anyone who believes that alleged Belzec grave #11 actually exists and asking them to show the evidence that has led them to believe that alleged Belzec grave #11 actually does exist.

Rather than start a new thread just for one alleged "huge mass grave" I thought this would be an appropriate thread.

Remember boys and girls, mass graves are physical entities.

Edited to add:

I would also like to expand this search for evidence to include alleged Sobibor grave #18. I'll phrase it this way:

I'm trying to find anyone who believes that alleged Sobibor grave #18 actually exists and asking them to show the evidence that has led them to believe that alleged Sobibor grave #18 actually does exist.

You can get some information about alleged Sobibor grave #18 here:

viewtopic.php?p=16876#p16876

Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 6:25 am It is a compendium of what I have found online. The forum it was on now needs a log in to see it, so I have replicated it here, so I can link to it more easily, when refuting liars and the ignorant on X, who claim there is only witness evidence, or there is no archaeological evidence.

Did CSC discover archaeological evidence for the existence of a "huge mass grave" that she labeled F16?

Do you deny that Treblinka II's F16 is an actual "huge mass grave" that has been scientifically proven to contain the remains of at least two people - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Keen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 06, 2025 1:47 am

Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 6:25 am It is a compendium of what I have found online. The forum it was on now needs a log in to see it, so I have replicated it here, so I can link to it more easily, when refuting liars and the ignorant on X, who claim there is only witness evidence, or there is no archaeological evidence.

Did CSC discover archaeological evidence for the existence of a "huge mass grave" that she labeled F16?

Do you deny that Treblinka II's F16 is an actual "huge mass grave" that has been scientifically proven to contain the remains of at least two people - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Have you read her report, linked to below?

https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/35 ... s12PhD.pdf

If, not, why not?
If yes, why are you asking me questions, that are answered in the report?

Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 6:25 am It is a compendium of what I have found online. The forum it was on now needs a log in to see it, so I have replicated it here, so I can link to it more easily, when refuting liars and the ignorant on X, who claim there is only witness evidence, or there is no archaeological evidence.

Did CSC discover archaeological evidence for the existence of a "huge mass grave" that she labeled F16?

Do you deny that Treblinka II's F16 is an actual "huge mass grave" that has been scientifically proven to contain the remains of at least two people - Yes. - or - No. - ??


Look at the cornered rat run!

A now professor of archaeology, who leads a team that conducts a geophysical survey of a site, that identifies a pit, that is logged in the report of the survey as c10m by c9m, and someone asks if there is any archaeological evidence. Then they ask about what is inside the pit. Only someone who has not bothered to read the report, or is unable to understand it, would ask such inane questions. The abusing troll is well and truly back on ignore.

Nessie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:51 pm [Keen] asks if there is any archaeological evidence.

Yes I did. To be more specific, I asked:

Did CSC discover archaeological evidence for the existence of a "huge mass grave" that she labeled F16?

Do you deny that Treblinka II's F16 is an actual "huge mass grave" that has been scientifically proven to contain the remains of at least two people - Yes. - or - No. - ??

But the cornered rat runs away from answering the simple questions.

First Roberto runs, then the coward hides:

Nessie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:51 pm [Keen is] back on ignore.

Keen wrote: ↑Thu Nov 06, 2025 6:32 pm

Nessie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:51 pm [Keen] asks if there is any archaeological evidence.

Yes I did. To be more specific, I asked:

Did CSC discover archaeological evidence for the existence of a "huge mass grave" that she labeled F16?

Do you deny that Treblinka II's F16 is an actual "huge mass grave" that has been scientifically proven to contain the remains of at least two people - Yes. - or - No. - ??

But the cornered rat runs away from answering the simple questions.

First Roberto runs, then the coward hides:

Nessie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:51 pm [Keen is] back on ignore.

What makes you believe this delusional and dishonest person is Roberto Muhlenkamp?

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu Nov 06, 2025 8:25 pm What makes you believe this delusional and dishonest person is Roberto Muhlenkamp?

I posted my answer here:

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=18362#p18362