Re: Ghislaine Maxwell & Elie Wiesel

[erichunt420]

The big lie is that deniers are willing to debate.

I’ll debate anyone right now

[erichunt420]

I will answer these wonderful questions when I go live yes folks the great new show DEFCON 3 coming soon

The problem it will distract from my focus on real shit not denier fantasy shit.

Simple - DENIERS DO NOT DEBATE.

I accept any and all debates. Uh hello? Skeptic? Aren’t you skeptical about who makes excuses? That fat fuck Peinovic is another big fat liar. He will gatekeep to enable his Nazi bubble of retarded takes and refused to debate and obviously still does refuse. Otherwise set the fucking date and time and let me know and I’m on. WOW FAT MIKE AND GERMAR on together? Both two pussies.

I could take them in a handicap match you fools. I would debate both of them at the same time duh

I HAVE THE CODOH WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP BELT.
The Bradley Belt.
Germar has some jabroni title.
Thanks

So first off - I don’t want to go into the gassing aspect at this time. I believe gassing happened and even now. Don’t waste too much of my time with this now. When I came to this conclusion and realized the Open Debaters didn’t actually want a debate and would lose on the issue, Hannover instabanned me from this forum. I was not able to make a new username. Germar Rudolf hid like a pussy and still does. Hides and makes appearances on the fat Nazi Peinovich another pussy afraid to debate. You have a bubble and echo chamber. Denial is a cult.

Okay, this is pure and literal nonsense and there's another thread here currently which makes this fact crystal-clear. Jake Shields has invited multiple historians to debate Rudolf this week (the debate to be released in a couple days), they repeatedly refused. In other words: you're factually wrong and the shoe is on the other foot. No revisionist is 'afraid to debate'. I believe you know this and it seems you are either lying or, at least, rather confused.

The same goes for your view on 'denial' as some kind of echo chamber, when it is exterminationism literally persecuting and creating laws to ensure they maintain a global 'bubble and echo chamber' on all 'Holocaust' questions. Once again, the shoe is on the other foot, and you are factually incorrect.

You're clearly not on some bold and impressive path to enlightenment either, Eric. Who knows, you may be right about Wiesel (stranger things have happened), but your case so far has appeared to be bizarre ramblings. In the past, you made evidence-based presentations exposing the deceptive patterns of the 'Holocaust', through hard work and impressive research. You now use ALL CAPS and rant about Elie Wiesel and claims that I'm quickly losing confidence you can back up at all. This is weird.

As I have already mentioned, years ago, I was initially curious and open to your reasons for changing your mind about 'gassing' and the like. But your case was void of any sound arguments which I believe could realistically have formed the basis for a natural and logical shift in your understanding of the history, or of the truth. It just has not added up.

For those who have not yet seen/read your withdrawal from revisionism, it is archived, here:

http://archive.is/DoGTn

As already mentioned, most of it is the same-old which can be found from exterminationists on this forum or anywhere else, but you were the first I have seen to put some special emphasis on this particular photograph (one of the first pieces of evidence presented as the rationale for your withdrawal):

forced5.jpg

This photograph shows a woman being held onto by three [Jewish] men who are standing upright. The woman looks emotionally distraught.

Your caption for this photo is "Elderly Jew being forced into Crematorium 5".

The same Eric Hunt who explained to me the absurd lies of the Jewish woman on a 'Spielberg pedestal' fishing out diamonds from her fecal matter for a year and a half, now glances at the above photograph and instantly concludes the woman is "being forced [into a gas chamber]". Case-closed, no further questions.

As I recall pointing out at the old forum:

• Crematoria V was also a morgue.
• When a person's relative (say, a child) died, their body was taken to the morgue.
• If the relative (say, a mother) was especially emotional, she might have to be pulled away or held back from her now-deceased child/relative.
• The three men are standing upright; they are not exerting themselves in any way.
• There is no line of other Jews here waiting to be 'gassed'; just a single woman, you claim was singled-out for 'gassing' (i.e. not aligned with the narrative).

This as "evidence" makes no sense whatsoever, yet you listed it as your top reasons for going from in-depth factual knowledge and reasoning as to how and why:

• The Majdanek gas chamber is a myth
• Massive patterns of lies in key witnesses (e.g. Sonderkommando such as Dario Gabai)
• Fraudulent 'excavations' a la Sturdy-Colls
• and much, much more...

...to "oops, I goofed, deniers are actually full of it". Simply put, this makes no sense.

I do recall Germar sharing his interpretation (on Rizoli's podcast, I think) of what happened between you two; something along the lines that you had certain ideas or expectations of him which he failed to meet or align with, from your perspective. And that after he did not meet your expectations, you were broken by this, in some way (I'm paraphrasing my vague recollection). Moreover, I am aware you were going through some serious personal events in your life at the time of this shift in opinion (I learned this elsewhere). I'm not going to share that here, out of respect, but it altogether seems quite clear that you did not [publicly] change your views based on new findings or interpretations of any kind (your 'withdrawal letter' makes that clear). This does not leave open much possibility other than that you were motivated through some other means.

But who knows. Maybe you do really believe in 'gassing' nowadays, and maybe sincerely. Even if so, this is more so a testament to (and study of) human behavior. Your 180 on this matter has not added any new evidence or interpretations to this topic, which would be strange, coming from you (given how much new evidence/interpretations you were able to present in favor of revisionism, earlier on).

All of this said, I still do appreciate your revisionist work. I know you have made an effort to scrub it from the web (copyright strikes and the like), but it's still around. I still recommend it to those new to revisionism. Some good stuff there, for sure.

[erichunt420]

Putting out a contest right here.

Irene Zisblatt the fake Dr. Mengele victim stolen valor question video .

The REWARD $5000 .

I’m putting in money to the first citizen journalist that provides video of asking Irene Zisblatt at a distance very far away at one of her scheduled appearances that invites the public to attend and ask questions, in a calm way not to frighten her. Fully engaging in our constitutionally protected right to free speech and assembly and without any violent intent -

1) Mrs Zisblatt, have you read the Times of Israel article that classifies you as although a victim of Auschwitz , not a selected Dr. Mengele victim because you are not a twin?
2) We have Auschwitz documents that prove you were part of a list of transit Jews that were transited through the camp for a period of time and never given tattoos. That story about Mengele removing your tattoo is therefore untrue.
3) Where did the diamonds really come from? Where did you get them?
4) Why did you cut the part you used to tell about being thrown over the electrified barbed wire fence onto the open topped train after you walked backwards out the gas chamber from the latest telling of your story on Google Talk?
5) Did you know Alison in Britain is banned from France for 40 years for singing a parody song about your discredited accounts? Do you agree with that?

Irene Zisblatt is a stolen valor case. No one is doing anything about it they let it go on in plain sight. It psychologically destroys children. It makes people stupid and gullible. Ass diamonds of Auschwitz? Zisblatt is a pedophile mindrapist STOLEN VALOR FAKE MENGELE VICTIM.

[joshk246]

I could take them in a handicap match you fools. I would debate both of them at the same time duh

I HAVE THE CODOH WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP BELT.
The Bradley Belt.
Germar has some jabroni title.
Thanks

It’s great saying you’re up for a debate now when Germar’s doing a debate very soon on Jake Shields…
Go on some of the other threads in the forum like the debate forum and post some of your evidence which persuaded you to be a “believer”, cheers.

[erichunt420]

No Josh that is not a debate . That is two jabronis having a dark match I got the belt

You should understand you were tricked. That is literally not a debate. Germar never debates and tricks people into thinking he does or even would

He runs like a little bitch at the sight of a real free speech champ

[joshk246]

No Josh that is not a debate . That is two jabronis having a dark match I got the belt

You should understand you were tricked. That is literally not a debate. Germar never debates and tricks people into thinking he does or even would

He runs like a little bitch at the sight of a real free speech champ

Eric, everything you’ve stated is a contradiction to reality. 4 people pulled out of the debate after they found out it was against Rudolf, they thought it was against shields and then when he said it was against Germar they started ducking. Like I said, make some threads on the debate forums, I’m interested to see if you have any new evidence at all to corroborate your claims.

Also you are an American right Eric?

[erichunt420]

Josh you need to understand I already won the strap at Rumble. Got the belt at mania vs Berg and have held it undefeated for many years.

Germar ran from the debate challenge - this is like the entire point of the article.

And Bradley Smiths fight for radical free speech.

It wasn’t for some German sympathizer of the third reich to try to restore his heroes or whatever the fuck he wants to take issue with that. If he isn’t a sympathizer and he wants to say it in a debate let him do that. I would not want to put words in his mouth. And mislabel anyone. But I know how to expose fakes phonies and frauds. Ever listen to Bob Grant getting a ridiculous caller?

[erichunt420]

No Josh that is not a debate . That is two jabronis having a dark match I got the belt

You should understand you were tricked. That is literally not a debate. Germar never debates and tricks people into thinking he does or even would

He runs like a little bitch at the sight of a real free speech champ

Eric, everything you’ve stated is a contradiction to reality. 4 people pulled out of the debate after they found out it was against Rudolf, they thought it was against shields and then when he said it was against Germar they started ducking. Like I said, make some threads on the debate forums, I’m interested to see if you have any new evidence at all to corroborate your claims.

Also you are an American right Eric?

JOSH YOU ARE WRONG ILL DEBATE GERMAR OR ANYONE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD IN A STEEL CAGE ANY TIME ANY DAY

GERMAR LIES AND CLAIMS HE SUPPORTS OPENS DEBATE

But that jabroni will never and I mean ever step into the squared circle with me.

Already ran his ass off to the locker room at Survivor Series. Making pathetic excuses

I’m the steel cage free speech champion of the world.

Germar would literally hang up the phone after one volley in a debate with me do you understand

[joshk246]

Josh you need to understand I already won the strap at Rumble. Got the belt at mania vs Berg and have held it undefeated for many years.

Germar ran from the debate challenge - this is like the entire point of the article.

And Bradley Smiths fight for radical free speech.

It wasn’t for some German sympathizer of the third reich to try to restore his heroes or whatever the fuck he wants to take issue with that. If he isn’t a sympathizer and he wants to say it in a debate let him do that. I would not want to put words in his mouth. And mislabel anyone. But I know how to expose fakes phonies and frauds. Ever listen to Bob Grant getting a ridiculous caller?

I’ve listened to your debate with Fritz-Berg but quite frankly Eric, Fritz is not on the level of Rudolf, why didn’t you DM Jake?? Jake was looking for more historians but if you’re so confident now then what stopped you from DM’ing Jake a month ago…

Also Eric. Are you American?

[erichunt420]

Yes I am American.

I don’t know Jake but will have an email contact up soon and I’ll write him.

But the fact is we already won because Germar will back out if I get in. I’m the Sid Vicious of this shit

[erichunt420]

So, supposedly 4 historians have pulled out of the Germar Rudolf debate on the Jake Shields podcast. We know how much time the exterminationist's spend on this forum so why have none of you decided to put your money where your mouth is?... On camera.

Erichunt3000@gmail.com
Eric Hunt accepts all challengers.
I hold the CODOH WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP BELT
The Bradley Belt
Germar ran away once I published my conclusion article. Like literally ran away and tossed some bullshit excuses in his wake. Fucking ran
Hannover INSTAbanned me from the Codoh forums lol.
The big denier lie is that they even debate

Fritz Berg at least whatever maybe it’s a New Jersey thing we aren’t pussies like that Rudolf the Pinocchio nose Holocaust denier.

Now run and hide and make excuses Germar you little bitch .

Run from the real People’s champ

[joshk246]

Yes I am American.

I don’t know Jake but will have an email contact up soon and I’ll write him.

But the fact is we already won because Germar will back out if I get in. I’m the Sid Vicious of this shit

Cool, obviously I and I don’t think anyone else on this forum has any issue with you so any problems you had on the old one shouldn’t happen now. I’m all for open debate and think it would be great to get you on camera defending your position.

I only ask if you’re an American because, you said in one of your replies… “You could have put the diamonds in a bag up your snatch you dumb cunt”
That is quintessentially a British euphemism “snatch” and “cunt” is very British/Anglo.

[erichunt420]

Yes I am American.

I don’t know Jake but will have an email contact up soon and I’ll write him.

But the fact is we already won because Germar will back out if I get in. I’m the Sid Vicious of this shit

Cool, obviously I and I don’t think anyone else on this forum has any issue with you so any problems you had on the old one shouldn’t happen now. I’m all for open debate and think it would be great to get you on camera defending your position.

I only ask if you’re an American because, you said in one of your replies… “You could have put the diamonds in a bag up your snatch you dumb cunt”
That is quintessentially a British euphemism “snatch” and “cunt” is very British/Anglo.

Bradley Smith would love this snatch cunt discussion. Huge Lenny Bruce fan.

I’m shaking things up. I’m a George Carlin guy who was a Lenny Bruce guy. We have to radically change the way we talk if we are allowing this facade of lies to encroach

[erichunt420]

Erichunt3000@gmail.com

Get it to Jake

[erichunt420]

I almost accidentally stopped Wiesel from abusing more kids and Kamala Harris locked me up for it LOL