Physical quantification would be impossible, as it would involve a massive amount of digging, sifting and disturbing of human remains. The area is large enough to have contained huge mass graves and not coincidentally, the other two AR camps and Chelmno also have large areas of buried cremated remains.I hope they have quantified how much ash is in those 2 hectares and determined that it amounts to hundreds of thousands in the alleged number of dead.
I believe what is evidenced, which is gassings, mass graves and cremations of hundreds of thousands of Jews. You have decided to not believe that evidence, and so you base your belief on mere opinion.Since none of that was supposedly done, it is expected that we believe the scale through this and the lack of injuries could only have been due to gassing.
Context is provided by evidence, all the evidence, not just cherry-picked parts. They, as in the 1945 Polish War Crimes investigators, were referring to an area that multiple eyewitnesses had identified to them as the location of the main mass graves, that a 1944 aerial photo showed as disturbed ground. That is further evidenced by the 2011 geophysical evidence. Cherry-picking that the Soviets used explosives when they joined local grave robbers to search for valuables in 1945, is dishonest.When you lifted it, you removed all context, they were referring to an area that had been used as a bomb range by the Soviet.
Between the Lazarette and the main mass grave area of the camp, it is c4 hectares. That is the area shown in the 1944 aerial photo that has disturbed ground and rectangular outlines, sections 2 and 3.


Which is your opinion, with no evidence from people who worked at the camp, documents pertaining to the operation of the camp, or from archaeology or geophysics from the camp site, to back you up.
Because I have evidence from people who worked at the camp, documents pertaining to the operation of the camp, and from archaeology and geophysics at the camp site, to back me up>in my opinion I do!
I have corroborating evidence to back up my opinion, you do not.The absolute state of Holocaust enjoyers.
The mass cremations were not to erase, as in make the corpses disappear. That cannot happen, as anyone with even basic forensic knowledge knows. Burning a corpse leaves cremains and ash. What Aktion 1005 achieved was to make body counts, identification and establishing the cause of death impossible. The Soviets failed to do that at Katyn, hence bodies could be counted to get a death toll, they could be identified as Polish soldiers and the cause of death was established as shooting.Dude, I've cited a 1,400p book talking about exactly how Aktion 1005 was supposedly able to erase the evidence.
Nesserto wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 7:13 am Stubble, like the resident bully, likes to pretend that what the archaeological surveys have found at the AR camps, in this case TII, is not evidence to prove large areas of disturbed ground containing cremated human remains.
One has to be a die hard Holocaust denier, to pretend that evidence does not prove the Nazis dug a series of mass graves at the camp and that the area found to contain buried remains and pits, is not large enough to account for hundreds of thousands of corpses.
What is nesserto waiting for?OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.
Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be - LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.
...
Additionally, and independent of any other Holocaust Archaeology Hoax Challenge, a - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)
Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
The USHMM alleges 925,000 jewish deaths, and the lying pig CSC alleges that up to a million jews were murdered at TII.
Show us one single pound of human cremains discovered at TII.
5 - In total, how many single, disconnected human teeth have been tangibly discovered within the 15 (+ 6) alleged Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question: __?__.One. Single. Pound.
One. Single. Tooth.

nesserto:
A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.
Nessie, how many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?
Nessie's answer:
12 - G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.

The mentally ill pathological liar claims that he has over 6 million pounds of this:


You are very selective about the evidence you will accept. Cherry-picking is another of the logical fallacies you rely upon. As for "words", they will refer to and describe evidence, something you cannot do.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 5:39 pm I'm willing to concede pits g-50-g-53 if the orthodoxy is willing to excavate them and prove them up, illustrating that they indeed contain human remains.
I'd concede the others too if they did the same, however, it is my opinion there are no remains to be found in the other pits, except perhaps the one behind the alleged lazertte, maybe.
This is something that will never happen though.
I eagerly await the recently concluded new csc study and the recently concluded Polish study of the alleged extermination camp situated at the supposed site of Treblinka II.
There will be, a lot of words...