Archie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 11, 2026 5:12 pm
Keen, who is Roberta?
roberta is roberto - and roberto is roberta.
It's a heshe thing. You haven't heard about roberto's... uhm... "hobby"?
But who is that? Roberto Muehlenkamp? Do you think Nessie is Muehlenkamp? Oof, that is a serious slap in the face to Muehlenkamp. Those are quite obviously different people.
Reminder: do not misgender other members of the forum. It's immature and makes the forum look bad.
The run-off-the-mill Joe average thinks that Judaism is 'the religion of the Old Testament' and your church-goer may think "Jews are the chosen people that haven't accepted Jesus
As revisionist views become known and common, the whole question of whether one 'believes' in the Holocaust narrative will come down to just how much weight one places on problematic witness claims and spurious documentation produced amid massive political incentives (and evidenced prevalence of ulterior motives), since all other evidence points the other direction.
What other evidence? Why do no Holocaust so-called revisionist produce an evidenced chronology as to what happened to the Jews in Europe, in particular those arrested by the Nazis and their Allies and sent to camps and ghettos?
Is the future of history really one where certain events are denied to have happened and the topic is just left at that? Will histories be written about what did not happen, rather than what did?
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
