Photographs of Treblinka II's alleged "huge mass graves" and human remains

[Keen]

This thread is the depository.

Photo's only please. Do your "debating" (whatever that means on CODOH) here:

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=601

[pilgrimofdark]

These are photos of the excavators at T-II grabbing clumps of bodies from mass graves and putting them in piles to be burned on roasters... or something.

(I didn't add any "irony quotes" to the above, because nearly every single word would be in quotes.)

The building in the first image is supposed to show the "first gas chamber" building, so the location of the cameraman in the camp in relation to any alleged "huge mass graves" could be triangulated from that position.



I colorized the full set of the alleged T-II excavator photos.

[Keen]

These are photos of the excavators at T-II grabbing clumps of bodies from mass graves and putting them in piles to be burned on roasters... or something.

(I didn't add any "irony quotes" to the above, because nearly every single word would be in quotes.)

The building in the first image is supposed to show the "first gas chamber" building, so the location of the cameraman in the camp in relation to any alleged "huge mass graves" could be triangulated from that position.

Thank you pilgrimofdark. And I know you posted those photos with sarcasm, but I don't believe those photos were taken inside the camp.

[pilgrimofdark]

Keen, let me know if you want me to delete that post. This is your research repository, after all. I posted them here because the "official" story is that Franz did take them from inside the camp. Though I agree they weren't.

The first two photos you posted and more from the same shoot are here in higher resolution. One of them is even a wider shot of "Plate 4.10."

I found a few photos of the 1944 Soviet mass grave excavations at the T-I site, too, if those would help.

[Keen]

Keen, let me know if you want me to delete that post. This is your research repository, after all. I posted them here because the "official" story is that Franz did take them from inside the camp. Though I agree they weren't.

The first two photos you posted and more from the same shoot are here in higher resolution. One of them is even a wider shot of "Plate 4.10."

I found a few photos of the 1944 Soviet mass grave excavations at the T-I site, too, if those would help.

No, those photos are fine pilgrimofdark. Thank you for posting them and giving your reason for doing so. I just wanted to make a note about them. Please feel free to post any photos that you think belong here.

Edited to add: Here is the direct link to those photos:

https://collections.yadvashem.org/en/ph ... ter?page=1

925,000 alleged murder victims allegedly buried within the boundary of Treblinka II, and that is all the human remains that they allegedly found during the conctruction of the monument.

And here is photo from that collection titled: "The site of a mass grave."



Thanks again pilgrimofdark.

[Keen]

CSC:

At Treblinka II, for example, candles left by mourners in pits in the wooded areas of the camp alluded to both the fact that the function of such features during the camp's period of operation was perhaps known (or at least thought to be known) and the function these features have acquired as part of the site's postabandonment history (Plate 6.7).

Here is a photo of "huge mass grave" F16. (Plate 6.7 / page 405):



CSC (page 179):

Many features were also recorded in the forested areas of the former Death Camp
(Figure 4.23; Appendix 4.3.7). Although it was not possible to apply geophysical
techniques in these areas, given the obstructions caused by vegetation, walkover
survey, which included an analysis of topographic information and taphonomic
indicators such as vegetation change, did allow level one survey to undertaken in these
areas (English Heritage 2007). This will provide the foundation for further work in the
future. Several excavated pits in the south west corner of the camp correspond to
areas of disturbance visible in post-abandonment aerial images (F24 and F25; Figure
4.23). Further pits exist to the east of these features (F9, F16-18, F20-22) and evidence
of memorialisation, in the form of candles and the placement of stones, was also
observed in these areas. These features likely represent post-war activity.

CSC calls this a "pit"?

Those "candles" look like empty cans to me.

CSC (page 478):

Feature Number - F16
Vegetation change -
Shape in Plan - Oval
Length of feature (in metres) - c .10m
Width of feature (in metres) - c. 9m
Additional Information - Pit. Candles and stones on east edge.

Notice that the fraud didn't give a depth for this slight depression.

And her excuse?

CSC:

it was not possible to apply geophysical techniques in these areas, given the obstructions caused by vegetation

What a joke. How hard would it have been to clear a path large enought to get the GPR unit over to this "pit / possible grave site"? How hard would it have been for 4 people to each grab a corner and just pick the unit up and carry it?

So the fraud calls a slight depression that contains some trash and a few rocks and no human remains what-so-ever, and what she says "likely represents post-war activity" - a "possible grave site."



But the most amazing thing of all is that most "revisionists" still believe that CSC is not a fraud, despite clear and convincing evidence that she is.

By examining each “proven mass grave” allegation separately, an intelligent person can easily see just how utterly vacuous and criminally fraudulent this transparent archaeological hoax really is.

[Wetzelrad]

In another thread, Nessie shared this photo from a tabloid article about "death-camp harvesters". The article admits that nothing is known about the photo's origin.



Nessie also shared a link to this webpage which lists low quality photos. All are said to be from Treblinka. Some include scattered unburnt bones.
http://www.deathcamps.org/treblinka/lasttracks.html

[pilgrimofdark]

These photos are said to have been taken by the Soviets in 1944 at the Treblinka labor camp. Taken from this book.

A photo of the sky above a group of Soviet soyjacks gawking and pointing at "remains of skeletal bones at the burning site."

Not pictured: remains, bones, burning site.

Spoiler

A local peasant/eyewitness roped into digging up... something. His strange testimony is here. Like many early eyewitnesses, he conflates T-I and T-II and gets the chronology completely wrong.

Spoiler

The Soviet soyjacks continue to pose while the peasant digs up... something.

Spoiler

I suspect there's an awful lot of gravel quarry photos that have been passed off as T-II photos.

[Keen]

These photos are said to have been taken by the Soviets in 1944 at the Treblinka labor camp. Taken from this book.

A photo of the sky above a group of Soviet soyjacks gawking and pointing at "remains of skeletal bones at the burning site."

Not pictured: remains, bones, burning site.

Spoiler

A local peasant/eyewitness roped into digging up... something. His strange testimony is here. Like many early eyewitnesses, he conflates T-I and T-II and gets the chronology completely wrong.

Spoiler

The Soviet soyjacks continue to pose while the peasant digs up... something.

Spoiler

I suspect there's an awful lot of gravel quarry photos that have been passed off as T-II photos.

Thank you pilgrimofdark, I hadn't seen those photos before.

[Keen]

925,000 jews, almost the exact number of every man, women and child living in South Dakota, alleged to have been buried in "huge mass graves" at T II, and the only photo of a "grave" that coincides with the the 15 "huge mass graves" numbered in the maps that we can find, is F16.



And how much human remains do we see in this photo class?

But wait, does the remains of a tin man count as human remains?

Hey look, here is proof that F16 contains human remains: