Criticism of Jews as a Collective (Not Just as Individuals) is Ethical and Warranted

[Keen]

[Keen]

[Keen]

There are lots of Holocaust denier, social media grifters, earning money attracting attention by making unevidenced and debunked claims about the Holocaust...

You are arguing that Holocaust denial is lucrative...

lucrative /loo͞′krə-tĭv/
adjective
1. Producing wealth; profitable.

You lie that I claimed denial is lucrative.

wtf?

I keep tellin’ ya: this one suffers from a psychosis.

Muehlenkamp's mental illness, along with his shameless lying and cowardice, is legendary.

[Wahrheitssucher]

.
This isn’t just vitally important info for Americans, but what is being exposed here applies to Canadian, Australian and almost European governments also.

It is info from CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou:

[Callafangers]

An excellent summary of some of the concerns addressed in this thread (and more):

[Stubble]

That video isn't bad Fangers.

I ran across, some stuff, and put it on odysee (post edited and link to channel removed, embedded just an AV presentation using a bitchute link). I ran across this a few months back when researching 'The Great Sedition Trial of 1944'.



This material ties directly in to the subject of this thread because for 'antisemitism' people in America were prosecuted for 'sedition' as 'nazis' because they didn't like the 'jew Deal' or FDR and his jew cabinet.

Their criticism was, protected by the first amendment, ethical and warranted.

[Wahrheitssucher]

.
Q. Is it both “ethical and warranted” to “criticise” and expose Jews both when they operate “as a collective” AND as “individuals” in ways that are immoral, criminal, illegal and destructive?

A: Yes! Absolutely ‘yes’!!

Well then why is almost nobody here engaging with or discussing the erosion of civil liberties in Germany, France, Australia, Britain, etc., based on false claims of protecting jews from ‘hate crimes’??!?

The blatantly zionist-created ‘anti-terrorist’ laws now being enacted in Europe, Australia and the two countries of the North American continent, if allowed to be implemented unchallenged, are going to remove the civil liberties of our children and grandchildren.

Yet people here are more willing to discuss 1942 telephone number books, etc.

CONSIDER:
BECAUSE of the public acquiescence in the deceitful demonisation of National Socialism, citizens in Germany have been unable to protest against the WW2 atrocity propaganda controlling their lives.

BECAUSE of hollowho@x ‘holocaust’ laws Germans to this day are not permitted to defend themselves in courts of law if jews decide they must be tried for questioning their quasi-religious, pseudo-historical, anti-German, racist, holyhoax ‘genocide’ narrative.

Yes, lawyers are still today NOT ALLOWED to defend their clients in court if its concerning the eight-decades old Allies ‘atrocity’ narrative.
Its absurd, but that’s the reality.

If you don’t know and doubt this then investigate the treatment of Lawyer Sylvia Stolz.

And because search engines and the internet are both now controlled by jews and jewish collectives, don’t be surprised if online search engines only gives you sites with justification for this judicial absurdity.

Therefore, here is online material that search-engines won’t take you to that give a factual, objective reporting of her persecution for attempting to defend her client Ernst Zündel.

1. Sylvia was arrested in the courtroom during her defence of the as yet unconvicted, so-called 'holocaust denier' Ernst Zündel… For this she was imprisoned for almost three and a half years, in spite of her having no previous convictions.



2. Zundel Lead Attorney Sylvia Stolz was bodily carried out of the courtroom for insisting that her client had the right to submit exculpatory evidence. Subsequently, Stolz was sentenced to more than three years in prison…



SPEECH FORBIDDEN, EVIDENCE FORBIDDEN, LEGAL DEFENCE FORBIDDEN: THE REALITY OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
On 24th November 2012, dissident German lawyer Sylvia Stolz appeared at the eighth annual meeting of the "Anti-Censorship Coalition" [Anti-Zensur-Koalition (AZK)] in Chur, Switzerland, where she presented a speech entitled “Sprechverbot, Beweisverbot, Verteidigungsverbot: Die Wirklichkeit der Meinungsfreiheit”.



Now this is the planned situation in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. A law has been introduced to allow criminalisation of lawyers for defending citizens arrested as ‘terrorists’ for peacefully protesting again the zionist-jewish genocide in the middle Eastern occupied territories.

If YOU personally don’t care because you have been duped by zionist rhetoric into hating all ‘Arabs’ and all ‘muslims’, give a thought for your children and grandchildren.

The moment the British government began proscribing political movements as terrorist organisations, rather than just militant groups, it was inevitable that saying factual things, making truthful statements, would become a crime.

And lo behold, here we are.

The Terrorism Act 2000 has a series of provisions that make it difficult to voice or show any kind of support for an organisation proscribed under the legislation, whether it is writing an article or wearing a T-shirt.

Recent attention has focused on Section 13, which is being used to hound thousands of mostly elderly people who have held signs saying: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action”. They now face a terrorism conviction and up to six months in jail.

But an amendment introduced in 2019 to Section 12 of the Act has been largely overlooked, even though it is even more repressive. It makes it a terrorism offence for a person to express “an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation” and in doing so be “reckless” about whether anyone else might be “encouraged to support” the organisation.

It is hard to believe this clause was not inserted specifically to target the watchdog professions: journalists, human rights groups and lawyers. They now face up to 14 years in jail for contravening this provision.

~ Jonathan Cook
https://open.substack.com/pub/jonathanc ... medium=ios

[Callafangers]

The blatantly zionist-created ‘anti-terrorist’ laws now being enacted in Europe, Australia and the two countries of the North American continent, if allowed to be implemented unchallenged, are going to remove the civil liberties of our children and grandchildren.

Yet people here are more willing to discuss 1942 telephone number books, etc.

All of what you address here is important and I agree its crucial to discuss these items. That said, our audience on this forum is limited (not ideal for activism that needs to reach the attention of millions of people, and fairly "niche" given its specific Holocaust-focus).

The importance of discussing phone books is showing the geographic, infrastructural, institutional, labor, etc. layout of areas surrounding 'extermination' operations. In other words, directly relevant to the mission and purpose of this forum.

Activism like that which you're discussing is important but only loosely fits as a topic here.

That said, Sylvia Stolz was discussed frequently at the old CODOH forum. She would often be brought up in threads as a heroine of free speech, having made great sacrifices for the cause of exposing these powers. One of our frequent members there kept her as his profile avatar for several years. She is well-known and widely respected among revisionists.

You are spot-on in the importance of discussing and radically opposing these new subversive laws. Thank you for sharing.

[Wahrheitssucher]

The blatantly zionist-created ‘anti-terrorist’ laws now being enacted in Europe, Australia and the two countries of the North American continent, if allowed to be implemented unchallenged, are going to remove the civil liberties of our children and grandchildren.

Yet people here are more willing to discuss 1942 telephone number books, etc.

All of what you address here is important and I agree its crucial to discuss these items. That said, our audience on this forum is limited (not ideal for activism that needs to reach the attention of millions of people, and fairly "niche" given its specific Holocaust-focus).

The importance of discussing phone books is showing the geographic, infrastructural, institutional, labor, etc. layout of areas surrounding 'extermination' operations. In other words, directly relevant to the mission and purpose of this forum.

Activism like that which you're discussing is important but only loosely fits as a topic here.

That said, Sylvia Stolz was discussed frequently at the old CODOH forum. She would often be brought up in threads as a heroine of free speech, having made great sacrifices for the cause of exposing these powers. One of our frequent members there kept her as his profile avatar for several years. She is well-known and widely respected among revisionists.

You are spot-on in the importance of discussing and radically opposing these new subversive laws. Thank you for sharing.

Thanks for your reply, Mr.C.
I did question whether it would be helpful to use the 1942 phone directory research as an example.
I almost didn’t use any example at all, as I foresaw this type of reply.

So for the record, I should say that I regard your research on that particular point as laudable and very important. So sorry that I didn’t clearly state that.

The only point I hoped to make — and still want to emphasise — is asking CODOH readers to consider what we think is of greater importance and priority RIGHT NOW, if we had to choose either one or the other.

The point I was hoping CODOH readers will agree is that any information which is of vital concern to our own liberties being eroded RIGHT NOW under the pretence of protecting zionist jews from irrational prejudice should take precedence over minutia related to events 8 DECADES AGO.

Both are important, obviously, and there doesn’t need to be an either/or choice,
only individual choices of what should take precedence.
In fact, our current prohibition to discuss intelligently, rationally and publicly the mythological aspects of the enforced ‘holocaust’ narrative is related to the current erosion of our human rights.

SUMMARY: I am suggesting that the evidence of level of contributions to this discussion forum suggests that currently it is not just one topic getting greater prominence, but that one is being ignored!

PLUS we have people like Scott Smith and Wetzelrad who appear to be actually promoting that ignoring as the ‘right’ choice.

[Nessie]

....

https://www.uklfi.com/doctor-suspended- ... ic-conduct

"UKLFI provided photographic evidence of Dr Kriesels attending multiple pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London holding a hand-drawn placard depicting the Israeli flag alongside the words: “rape, steal, cry, kill, cheat, lie.”

This sign, aimed at Israelis as a whole, constitutes a sweeping racist generalisation and a clear example of antisemitism. She carried the placard at events on 4 June, 19 July, and 6 September 2025, and was also photographed giving an obscene gesture towards Jewish counter-demonstrators.

UKLFI had also documented some of Dr Kriesels’ extremist posts on X, where she repeatedly claimed that Jews—Zionist or not—embodied “supremacy,” described Judaism as “racist, imperialist and genocidal,” and stated she was “sickened” by Jews.

The UKLFI complaint highlighted that Dr Kriesels publicly characterised Hamas as “oppressed resistance fighters” and “not terrorists,” potentially breaching Section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000, which prohibits expressing support for a designated terrorist organisation."

[HansHill]

"UKLFI provided photographic evidence of Dr Kriesels attending multiple pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London holding a hand-drawn placard depicting the Israeli flag alongside the words: “rape, steal, cry, kill, cheat, lie.”

This sign, aimed at Israelis as a whole, constitutes a sweeping racist generalisation and a clear example of antisemitism. She carried the placard at events on 4 June, 19 July, and 6 September 2025, and was also photographed giving an obscene gesture towards Jewish counter-demonstrators.

UKLFI had also documented some of Dr Kriesels’ extremist posts on X, where she repeatedly claimed that Jews—Zionist or not—embodied “supremacy,” described Judaism as “racist, imperialist and genocidal,” and stated she was “sickened” by Jews.

The UKLFI complaint highlighted that Dr Kriesels publicly characterised Hamas as “oppressed resistance fighters” and “not terrorists,” potentially breaching Section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000, which prohibits expressing support for a designated terrorist organisation."

This is why the world is laughing at the UK. You posted this excerpt thinking that this justifies an arrest? Laughable.

[Wahrheitssucher]

"UKLFI provided photographic evidence of Dr Kriesels attending multiple pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London holding a hand-drawn placard depicting the Israeli flag alongside the words: “rape, steal, cry, kill, cheat, lie.”

This sign, aimed at Israelis as a whole, [Israel as a political entity and racist, apatheid ethno-state] constitutes an sweeping [accurate, anti-]racist generalisation and a clear example of [political expression] that [has NOTHING TO DO with race or ethnicity so can not be misrepresented as] antisemitism [except by anti-semites who falsely and dangerously equate Israel with ALL Jews].
She carried the placard at events on 4 June, 19 July, and 6 September 2025, and was also photographed giving an obscene gesture towards Jewish counter-demonstrators [ha-ha-ha ]

The UKLFI complaint highlighted that Dr Kriesels publicly characterised Hamas as “oppressed resistance fighters” and “not terrorists,” potentially breaching Section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000, which prohibits expressing support for a designated terrorist organisation."

This is why the world is laughing at the UK. You posted this excerpt thinking that this justifies an arrest? Laughable.

Regretably poor Nessie has psychological issue. But that is no excuse for her supporting the erosion of our civil liberties and for spreading zionist deceits.
So I corrected her racist, genocide-supporting nonsense [above].

Here’s another person from the NHS, also attacked by zionists for her legitimate political views in the UK, commenting on Dr Kriesel’s suspension:

…the UK 'israel' lobby and British jewish supremacists doxxed her, smeared her in the papers, and succeeded in getting her suspended.

Why? Because of a sign she held at the London national demo for Palestine and for exercising her freedom of speech to call out jewish supremacy (zionism).

The irony is palpable. Their message is: "Don't call us jewish supremacists; we are the victims, and 'anti-Semitism' is rife. So now we will attack you like an organised mafia and use our links in the media and the NHS to ruin your career and life."

They don't want us to say jewish supremacy because it prevents them from claiming false victimhood or crying 'anti-Semitism,' which would then expose their jewish privilege and exceptionalism.

Ellen could have said the exact same thing about Christianity or Islam; she could have criticised any country or even the UK itself in the same manner, and she would not have been attacked like this.

Our freedom of speech in Britain stops at 'israel' and any criticism of jewish behaviour.

@WhitHealth, our NHS, and Britain are well and truly occupied by jewish supremacy (zionism).

This pattern of abuse is outrageous.
Ellen did not say or do anything wrong.

These are just two cases amongst hundreds of jews-for-Israel subverting the law:

https://open.substack.com/pub/jonathanc ... medium=ios

⁦https://open.substack.com/pub/craigmurr ... edium=ios⁩

https://open.substack.com/pub/craigmurr ... medium=ios

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/12/10/j ... ne-action/