Since I answered those questions, I am now looking to get my question answered. Have you read C S-C report? Yes or no.Keen wrote: ↑Tue Nov 04, 2025 2:10 pm Sorry, looking for an answers to these questions first.
....Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
Nessie's answer:
True
Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?
Nessie's answer:
True
Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]
Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]
Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]
Nessie, which of the folloing: G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54, F1, F9, F16 - did CSC prove are not garbage pits: _?_.Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 04, 2025 5:07 pmSince I answered those questions, I am now looking to get my question answered. Have you read C S-C report? Yes or no.Keen wrote: ↑Tue Nov 04, 2025 2:10 pm Sorry, looking for an answers to these questions first.
....Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
Nessie's answer:
True
Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?
Nessie's answer:
True
Are you alleging that the above description is describing this:Nessie:
"a large area of defined vegetation, located in the south east corner of what
would have been the Living Camp area, which was visible on wartime aerial images,
is still evident on the ground (F31; Figure 4.23). Although inaccessible to survey
equipment, an inspection of this area revealed a considerable number of artefacts
located on the surface, including spoons, mugs and other metal objects, some of
which revealed maker's symbols (Plate 4.26; Figure 4.28).
Yes. - or - No. - ??
Show us a photo of the alleged garbage pit descirbed above.
Show us a photo of what was allegedly discovered in this alleged garbage pit.
Now let's watch the cornered rat run!
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]
Keen refuses to answer my one question, after I have answered questions from him. The reason why I want to know whether he has read C S-C report, is that he posts images from it, but then he asks questions which the report answers, such as the location of the waste pit and images of items found there. It is like he can only manage to look at the images, but he cannot manage the words. 
Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]
I knew he would run! You mean this one here Roberto:
Show us a photo of the alleged garbage pit that you are talking about.
Show us a photo of what was allegedly discovered in your alleged garbage pit.
Nessie, which of the folloing: G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54, F1, F9, F16 - did CSC prove are not garbage pits: _?_.
Are you alleging that the above description is describing this:Nessie:
"a large area of defined vegetation, located in the south east corner of what
would have been the Living Camp area, which was visible on wartime aerial images,
is still evident on the ground (F31; Figure 4.23). Although inaccessible to survey
equipment, an inspection of this area revealed a considerable number of artefacts
located on the surface, including spoons, mugs and other metal objects, some of
which revealed maker's symbols (Plate 4.26; Figure 4.28).
Yes. - or - No. - ??
Show us a photo of the alleged garbage pit descirbed above.
Show us a photo of what was allegedly discovered in it.
Now let's watch the cornered rat run!
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]
Let's see the images Roberto.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]
Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
Nessie's answer:
True
Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?
Nessie's answer:
True
Which of the folloing: G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54, F1, F9, F16
did CSC prove ARE NOT garbage pits: _?_.
Nessie's answer:
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.