Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

For more adversarial interactions
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:04 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:33 pm
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:20 pm


11.

Which 11?

Image

G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.
Did CSC scientifically prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Did CSC conclusively prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3034
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:05 pm
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:59 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:30 pm

Then answer the question correctly.

An acceptable answer is either - Yes. - or - No.



Just to be clear Roberto, is your answer to the above question: - True. - ?
Back to calling me Roberto, so no answers from me.
Look at it run!

:lol:
But I do not run, when you ask me a question, without any of the abuse, or mis-gendering etc.
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:04 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:33 pm
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:20 pm


11.

Which 11?

Image

G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.
Nessie, when allege that CSC actually proved that mass graves actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp, what standard of proof are you alleging?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:04 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:33 pm
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:20 pm
11.

Which 11?

Image

G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:12 pm But I do not run
:lol:

Did CSC scientifically prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Did CSC conclusively prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

When you allege that CSC actually proved that mass graves actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp, what standard of proof are you alleging?
Last edited by Keen on Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3034
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:11 pm
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:04 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:33 pm


Which 11?

Image

G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.
Did CSC scientifically prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Did CSC conclusively prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??
The answer to that goes back to the question;

"Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?"

For which you said;

"An acceptable answer is either - Yes. - or - No."

But I had pointed out that what is inside a grave is reliably determined by excavation, not just geophysics. Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains. To do that, other evidence, such as an excavation, is needed.
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Look at it run!

Nessie:

Did CSC scientifically prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Did CSC conclusively prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

When you allege that CSC actually proved that mass graves actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp, what standard of proof are you alleging?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:20 pm Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Hey stupid, what is the definition of a mass grave?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3034
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:22 pm Look at it run!

Nessie:

Did CSC scientifically prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Did CSC conclusively prove that those 11 alleged "huge mass graves" actually exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

When you allege that CSC actually proved that mass graves actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp, what standard of proof are you alleging?
You referred to me as it and claim that I am running from questions, when I have just answered, so no more answers from me, till you behave.
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

How many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

An acceptable answer will be one of the following:

0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., or More than 15.

Nessie:

11.
Nessie:
Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
If there was ever a more telling example of how mentally retarded and ill Roberto is, I'd like to see it.

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.
Last edited by Keen on Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3034
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:24 pm
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:20 pm Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Hey stupid, what is the definition of a mass grave?
You have been abusive, so no answer from me. Learn to behave and be respectful and I will answer. Meanwhile, what do you say is the definition of a mass grave?
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3034
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:27 pm
How many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

An acceptable answer will be one of the following:

0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., or More than 15.

Nessie:

11.
Nessie:
Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
If there was ever a more telling example of how mentally retarded and ill Roberto is, I'd like to see it.
You are scared to debate, because you cannot cope with complex answers and can only cope with simple, yes, no, true, false answers. It must blow your mind, to get the answer of yes and no, to one of your questions!
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:28 pm
Keen wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:24 pm
Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:20 pm Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Hey stupid, what is the definition of a mass grave?
You have been abusive, so no answer from me. Learn to behave and be respectful and I will answer. Meanwhile, what do you say is the definition of a mass grave?
Just how stupid are you Roberto?

BTW, I just added it to the above post.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:30 pm You are scared to debate
:lol:

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=421&start=30

:lol:
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 3034
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Nessie »

I see you answered one of my questions;

"A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people."

Agreed. The UN states it has to be three or more, but that is not a set definition. Usually it would be more and caused by a mass death event, such as a plague, large accident, or war.
K
Keen
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:34 pm I see you answered one of my questions;

"A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people."

Agreed. The UN states it has to be three or more, but that is not a set definition. Usually it would be more and caused by a mass death event, such as a plague, large accident, or war.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I don't think that Roberto has the mental capacity to realize what a retard he's just proven himself to be.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply