Criticism of Jews as a Collective (Not Just as Individuals) is Ethical and Warranted

[Callafangers]

SUMMARY: He is a person self-identifying as ‘jewish’ who felt it was his duty to assist the false narrative that is being used to divide America and justify erosion of civil liberties around effectively a public execution that according to someone in Kirk's entourage, everybody within his team thinks Israel was behind.
If anyone here doesn’t think that is both revealing and troublesome, I respectfully suggest YOU haven’t yet understood the wider perspective of holyH promotion that my post tried to raise.

You may very well be correct, re: Kirk -- I haven't looked into the shooting much at all but I have seen evidence that Kirk's position on Israel has shifted in recent weeks/months, so I find that to be significant support for your overall set of questions. Nonetheless, it does not make much sense to dedicate multiple pages of posts on this thread to such a topic, which is much more niche and focused and likely best suited outside of a Holocaust-specific forum.

Overall, cheers to you for looking into this, I do think it is important work, but I also think others here are not off-base for suggesting it is better to keep the topic somewhat contained outside of this subforum.

As for Nazgul, while your theory is possible, there are other possibilities, like that he is simply convinced by some of the same narratives that millions of other people are also convinced by (including many members on this forum who otherwise agree with you/me/etc.). You will find a range of opinions here on every topic. I have "bumped heads" with some members here on the question of 9/11 and Zionist-Jewish involvement. When such conversations come up, I try to avoid letting them get out-of-hand -- it just isn't the place for it.

Nazgul has made some outstanding contributions to Holocaust revisionism. He was the first to my knowledge who has pointed out the lengthy Fahrplanordnung stops en route to AR camps, which are only reasonably explained by way of human [Jewish] departures/onboarding at these locations, supporting that even schedules showing Treblinka/Malkinia or Sobibor, Belzec, etc. as a "one-way trip" are not necessarily so. Nazgul has also shared lots of other valuable resources and discoveries (e.g. regarding Zwangsarbeitslagers, rail construction, etc.), too many to list here, many of which were unfortunately lost in the earlier RODOH forum which got 'vaporized' similar to CODOH Forum 1.0.

Overall, your suspicions about Jewish activity in general are, I think, warranted, however I would hope you might try to take a more nuanced view of things and be a bit more cautious in drawing conclusions, as well as in choosing the proper venue for any particular discussions/proclamations/etc. Overall, you do great work here, I just think we also need to take measures to maintain a degree of order and also give some grace to members (e.g. Nazgul) who have objectively done good work here and in other revisionist settings.

[Wahrheitssucher]

I don't see a 'jewish conspiracy' here and if it weren't for Netanyahu immediately yelling Israel didn't do it, I would lend the idea absolutely 0 credence.
Currently, I want evidence, so, on other platforms I am asking questions and seeking answers. I'm not doing that here ;because the shooting is not even tangentially related to the Holy H.

I could refute everything you wrote, but …this is NOT about the ballistics or technical details of a public execution.
So I won’t.
I’ll just applaud you for being open and interested to see whether your current view can be credibly refuted. I wish you well doing your own search for refutations of it. Such DO already exist, but you’ll have to wade through all the deliberately confusing, smokescreen speculations that are also out there.

.-.-

This topic is about Jewish collectives clandestinely doing dastardly deeds and whining ‘anti-semitism’ if anyone even mentions them as a possible suspect.

The point being suggested: “is it warranted to criticise collectives of jews for their actions?”.

Where do YOU stand on that question?

.-.-

Here is another assassination where there is considerable compelling, credible evidence that a zionist, jewish collective is guilty of it yet were never investigated for it: the Forrestal killing.
This article about that is by LAURENT GUYÉNOT.

https://www.unz.com/article/fifteen-yea ... forrestal/

There is also a book reaching the same conclusion regarding a zionist jewish collective killing Forrestal then using all their sayanim ‘helpers’ whom are infiltrated throughout society, into suppressing info plus blocking a proper investigation:
https://dukereportbooks.com/books/the-a ... forrestal/


.-.-.-.-

The death of Lady Diana Spencer (and the obviously false patsy in that death of her driver) is another example.



We don’t need to go into the details of these two examples here, either.

But if we are honest and well-informed we can understand that sayanim in police, judiciary, medical staff, etc. ARE able to switch blood-samples, start illegal embalming procedures, block investigations, etc., etc., etc.

Yes, that requires theorising about people conspiring. Of course.
But if after everything we have witnessed in the last few decades we are a person who thinks ‘conspiracies’ NEVER occur, so theorising and investigating their possibility is “crazy”, then sadly I suggest we have become a person who has been successfully duped.

[Stubble]

.-.-

This topic is about Jewish collectives clandestinely doing dastardly deeds and whining ‘anti-semitism’ if anyone even mentions them as a possible suspect.

The point being suggested: “is it warranted to criticise collectives of jews for their actions?”.

Where do YOU stand on that question?

.-.-

You know where I stand on this.

Of course it is.

I've been very clear on this point.

Furthermore I've pointed at the conditions as they existed in Weimar and the parallels to where we are today with the degeneracy and social subversion, the endless parroting of impossible equality etc.

I will let the painter say this again;



The term 'sayanim' was used above. For those unwise to the sayanim, I present this short video to you.

[Wahrheitssucher]

Criticism of Jews when they are acting criminally and/or immorally as a collective (not just as individuals) DEFINITELY is both ethically required by decent humans and is also warranted.

Because if we don’t do that now, we are all going to be gagged and prevented by law from combatting any negative activities by jewish collectives in the future:

[Eye of Zyclone]

We don’t need to go into the details of these two examples here, either.

But if we are honest and well-informed we can understand that sayanim in police, judiciary, medical staff, etc. ARE able to switch blood-samples, start illegal embalming procedures, block investigations, etc., etc., etc.

Yes, that requires theorising about people conspiring. Of course.
But if after everything we have witnessed in the last few decades we are a person who thinks ‘conspiracies’ NEVER occur, so theorising and investigating their possibility is “crazy”, then sadly I suggest we have become a person who has been successfully duped.

If Freemasons could do it in the inquiry into the sinking of the Titanic as now conceded, considering the possibility that Zionists & other influential groups did it in other cases seems pretty fair if not logical if I'm asked.

[Nessie]

...

If Freemasons could do it in the inquiry into the sinking of the Titanic as now conceded, considering the possibility that Zionists & other influential groups did it in other cases seems pretty fair if not logical if I'm asked.

...

Freemasons, Jews, the UK aristocracy, wealthy business people, the Roman Catholic Church, all sorts of groups seek to influence others to make improvements for themselves. Anti-Semites target criticism against Jews for criticism, often to deflect criticism away from other groups.