Junk Folder for Derails

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2858
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Announcing the Inaugural 2026 ARMREG Holocaust Summit!

Post by Nessie »

Still waiting for evidence that I was a "disrupter" and can I just point out that my avatar shows that I am using the Nessie name based on the mythical (or is it?) monster from Loch Ness, not as a version of Vanessa :roll:

Kean, there is no partnership, unless you wish to produce evidence of actual resettlement, not burials, which is not resettlement by any definition of that word.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Announcing the Inaugural 2026 ARMREG Holocaust Summit!

Post by HansHill »

Nessie wrote: Tue Sep 02, 2025 4:26 pm Still waiting for evidence that I was a "disrupter"
Was that to me?

Dude there is more evidence of your disruptions than there is for the Holocaust :lol: I'll start with just the very fact of the mods having 3 threads here for your disruptions: You have Nessie's Greatest Hits, Junk Folder For Derails, and Logical Fallacies [Remedial education for Nessie], the latter of which is a containment thread for your inane and incorrect babbling about logical fallacies. If I joined lets say a car forum, acted the way you do with the regulars there, and within 9 months had your reputation there, then yes that would be considered a disruption.

"B-b-but you're abusing me!"

I'm one of the few who have gone to bat for you here, and have urged others to find the positives in your continued presence here. I have called myself "pro-Nessie" and coined "the NQ" after you. I'm not abusing you.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by Keen »

ConfusedJew wrote: Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:12 pm This is an IQ test basically.
Yeah, and I think you're scoring somewhere in the 50-60 range Retarded jew.
This article throws light upon the four levels of mental retardation in humans. The levels are: 1. Mild Mental Retardation 2. Moderate Retardation 3. Severe Retardation 4. Profound Mental Retardation.

Level # 1. Mild Mental Retardation:
About 90 per cent of the mentally retarded persons are found to belong to this category. They have I.Qs of 55 to 69...

Level # 2. Moderate Retardation:

Otherwise known as trainable retarded, moderately retarded people have the I.Q. range of 40 to 54
Looks like you're in the mild to moderate range of retardation Retarded jew.

But don't despair Retarded jew, you're "trainable."

Retarded jew wrote:
Instead of Confused Jew (I am no longer confused), I would like to change my name to Straw jew.
Nope, sorry, it's "Retarded jew." (But "lying, cowardly retarded jew" fits too.)
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Treblinka Work Camp Delousing Chamber

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:18 pm No wonder you will see everything in your favour. The evidence for TII as a death camp is in fact overwhelming.
Liar.

https://thisisaboutscience.com/
Last edited by Keen on Wed Sep 10, 2025 11:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Treblinka Work Camp Delousing Chamber

Post by Keen »

SanityCheck wrote: Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:46 pm It just makes it piquant when a 'revisionist' cannot even find a document to back up their fantasies.
Says the high BMI / low IQ cult member who can't even find a mass grave to back up his magically disappearing jew theory.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Treblinka Work Camp Delousing Chamber

Post by Keen »

SanityCheck wrote: Fri Dec 06, 2024 11:10 pm Acting as if you can just ignore every source other than a handful of German documents is frankly rather cognitively challenged.
Says the high BMI / low IQ reality denier who believes in magically disappearing liquid jews.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1121
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by Archie »

Keen wrote: Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:55 pm
ConfusedJew wrote: Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:12 pm This is an IQ test basically.
Yeah, and I think you're scoring somewhere in the 50-60 range Retarded jew.
This article throws light upon the four levels of mental retardation in humans. The levels are: 1. Mild Mental Retardation 2. Moderate Retardation 3. Severe Retardation 4. Profound Mental Retardation.

Level # 1. Mild Mental Retardation:
About 90 per cent of the mentally retarded persons are found to belong to this category. They have I.Qs of 55 to 69...

Level # 2. Moderate Retardation:

Otherwise known as trainable retarded, moderately retarded people have the I.Q. range of 40 to 54
Looks like you're in the mild to moderate range of retardation Retarded jew.

But don't despair Retarded jew, you're "trainable."

Retarded jew wrote:
Instead of Confused Jew (I am no longer confused), I would like to change my name to Straw jew.
Nope, sorry, it's "Retarded jew." (But "lying, cowardly retarded jew" fits too.)
Keen, way too many insults.
Incredulity Enthusiast
K
Keen
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Best Mainstream Pieces of Evidence

Post by Keen »

ConfusedJew wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 10:13 pm my IQ is well into the top 1%?
Right. And you have trouble understanding - Yes. - or - No. - questions!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What a retard.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1121
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Best Mainstream Pieces of Evidence

Post by Archie »

Keen wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:29 pm
ConfusedJew wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 10:13 pm my IQ is well into the top 1%?
Right. And you have trouble understanding - Yes. - or - No. - questions!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What a retard.
Keen, you need to cut it out with all the insults.

And don't smother the whole board with repetitive comments.
really.jpg
really.jpg (27.61 KiB) Viewed 589 times
Reminder from the forum rules:
Maintain a high signal to noise ratio, i.e., make sure your posts are informative and that they make a meaningful addition to the discussion. High noise posting is especially unwelcome on the Debate board.
Incredulity Enthusiast
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2858
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Nessie »

HansHill wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:18 am
Nessie wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:14 am I can see that, where the samples were taken, did not display Prussian blue.
Good. Then you agree with me that CJ's point about PB dilution is moot. Thank you.

Awaiting Confused Jew's rebuttal on this point.
I am not agreeing with you on that point. My point, that you dodge, is that the Prussian blue is clearly not evenly spread across the walls and with so little wall left to view, it cannot be ruled out that none of the chambers used for gassings even displayed at least minimal signs of Prussian blue.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by HansHill »

Reported to mods as indicated above.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2858
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Nessie »

HansHill wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:24 am Reported to mods as indicated above.
I am not part of your debate about testing, as I do not have sufficient knowledge of the process. I have raised a point about how the coverage on the walls of the chambers is not even and asked, without answer, how that may affect test results. I have also raised the point that since coverage of PB is not even, that it is not present in the one small part of Krema II that can be accessed, does not mean it is not present at all.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by HansHill »

Nessie wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:38 am without answer
???

https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=455
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2858
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Nessie »

HansHill wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 12:08 pm
Nessie wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:38 am without answer
???

https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=455
Where, in that thread, is my question about uneven coverage on the walls affecting test results, answered?
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1121
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Archie »

Nessie wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:38 am
HansHill wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:24 am Reported to mods as indicated above.
I am not part of your debate about testing, as I do not have sufficient knowledge of the process. I have raised a point about how the coverage on the walls of the chambers is not even and asked, without answer, how that may affect test results. I have also raised the point that since coverage of PB is not even, that it is not present in the one small part of Krema II that can be accessed, does not mean it is not present at all.
Nessie, if you insist on resurrecting your secret PB hypothesis, please do so in the thread we have dedicated to that exact topic.
https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=455

You are seemingly the only person on the planet who believes that theory, so please do not try to bring it up in multiple threads in parallel.
Incredulity Enthusiast
Locked