Deliberate provocation = trolling

To discuss admin issues and forum improvements
Post Reply
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Deliberate provocation = trolling

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

.
It was recently requested by HansHill to be shown where the resident holyH troll admitted that they ONLY post on revisionist discussion forums in order to “provoke”, disrupt and thus sabotage reasonable and intelligent discussion.

Here are screen grabs of this and other related admissions: i.e. evidence of her mission to disrupt and ‘troll’.

This first one is from the falsely-named ‘skeptics forum’.
Nessie and St. Mech admit they trolled RODOH.

Image

Here is Nessie’s admission of her real opinion of anyone who questions ANY aspect of the compulsory holyH belief-system. (CT stands for ‘conspiracy theorist’). In Nessie’s opinion we are “Nazi apologists and anti-semites”, and she thinks all our discussion is “filth”.

Image

Nessie was permitted to troll and post more than any other person at RODOH. The second top poster was Turnagain because he attempted unsuccessfully to reason with almost Nessie’s every post. This only fed the trolling activity as Nessie refused to concede on any point, no matter how trivial.

The same behaviour is permitted here at the new CODOH. Look at the huge quantity of posting compared to most other members.

Image

Image

Here is an evidence of her swamping a topic that she didn’t like. Four posts from Gibson compared to THIRTEEN trolling replies:

Image
Image

For posterity here is an explanation of how Nessie came upon the ‘logical fallacy’ and ‘reversal of proof’ arguments: viz. she learnt them from a revisionist.
Image
Image
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 999
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Deliberate provocation = trolling

Post by HansHill »

Wow, WS with the receipts.

Grade A material as always buddie, thank you for this 8-)
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Deliberate provocation = trolling

Post by Archie »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Wed Sep 03, 2025 7:30 am Here is Nessie’s admission of her real opinion of anyone who questions ANY aspect of the compulsory holyH belief-system.
Stop calling Nessie a girl. You were warned about this recently. Please don't force my hand on this.
Incredulity Enthusiast
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Deliberate provocation = trolling

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

Archie wrote: Wed Sep 03, 2025 11:27 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Wed Sep 03, 2025 7:30 am Here is Nessie’s admission of her real opinion of anyone who questions ANY aspect of the compulsory holyH belief-system.
Stop calling Nessie a girl. You were warned about this recently. Please don't force my hand on this.
That’s not what I have done. Nor am I doing that now.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Deliberate provocation = trolling

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

What Confused Jew is now doing here at CODOH is trying to frame his discussions as if:
i.) he is the sane one showing ‘the holocaust happened’,
against
ii.) delusional people who are arguing ‘the holocaust didn’t happen’.

That I suggest is what his whole ‘flat-earth’ comparison is about.

I write this so if anyone hasn’t noticed it yet, they don’t allow him to continue this deceptive/delusional tactic.

He is presumably resorting to this ‘strawman’ distortion of the actual argument because he presumably subconsciously recognised at some point that by sticking with the actual debated issues his regurgitated Ai nonsense was repeatedly getting demolished.

It appears to be a defence tactic to assuage his emotional disturbance at realising the narrative he and his people have been indoctrinated with their whole lives is deeply flawed.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Deliberate provocation = trolling

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

.
Here is yet another example of trolling with automatic, unthinking, knee-jerk contradiction.
Trolling that relies on deeply delusional, dimwitted deduction.

In this case it relies on the fallacious reasoning of ‘appeal to authority’.

EXAMPLE OF ‘RELIGIOUS’ TRUE-BELIEVER, DELUSIONAL THINKING
REALITY: The King James translation of ‘the Bible’ is not ‘the word of god’. It was instead written in antiquity by rather intellectually primitive men. By humans! And it was not dictated to them by some jealous, tribal desert-deity.

TRUE-BELIEVER: No, you are wrong. Do you accept that I can produce Bible scholarship that come from other credible Christian Bible scholars, which also state that the Bible is the word of God?

EXAMPLE OF ‘QUASI-RELIGIOUS’ TRUE-BELIEVER, HOLOCAUST DELUSIONAL THINKING
Nessie wrote: Fri Sep 12, 2025 2:44 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Fri Sep 12, 2025 1:29 pm .
Summary:
The ONLY section of the Wannsee protocol that the holyH promulgators claim states a genocidal, mass-murderous intent without the use of euphemism, claims that on the back of a debunked mistranslation.

The Wannsee protocol does not say “…would, if released…”.
That is a deliberate, calculated mistranslation.

It actually says “…will, upon release…”.

So, yet again this particular deceitful, delusional individual is denying reality.
And that is not just a “mistake” or merely being “wrong” due to ignorance.
It is part of a decade-long pattern of wilful, stubborn, denial of all evidence presented that refutes the holyH narrative.
Which is literally insanely dishonest behaviour.
Do you accept that I can produce translations that use "if released", that come from credible sites, such as the German House of Wannsee Conference website?
An intelligent, sane individual would consult a German-English dictionary, a translation software, or someone fluent in German to ascertain what is the truth here.

A delusional, dishonest, intellectually-challenged troll would not. They would refer to biased ‘authorities’ whose role it is to maintain and promote the false, quasi-religious belief system.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
Post Reply