"Starvation Revisionism": Gaza and the Holocaust

[borjastick]

For 'settlers' read Stealers/Thieves.

[Wahrheitssucher]

You yourself won’t even admit it is definitely occurring!!, Instead you wrote it only “seems” to be happening with full Israeli governmental and societal backing,

Which makes YOU a jewish genocide denier.

Not only are the Israeli jews deliberately starving non-jews to death in occupied Palestine but they are even shooting the starving people dead as they queue for food-aid.

What sort of wicked mind-set then comes on a discussion forum, proudly proclaims to be jewish and suggests it might not be happening, and if it is its only a tiny faction” in the Israeli govt who is somehow enabling this mass-starvation???

I don't know what is happening there.

…The intent is not to kill all of the Palestinians so it wouldn't be genocide, but…

So you admit that you do not know.
And yet — as usual — you argue for and defend a jew-centric narrative anyway.

Shameful.

Plus you do not know what the definition of genocide is, CJ.

Do you understand the words “…in whole or in part…”?

Definition
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
— Killing members of the group;
— Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
— Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
— Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
— Forcibly transferring children of the group to another.

https://www.un.org/en/genocide-prevention/definition

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What are you doing here, CJ?
You don’t show any curiosity.
You have been arguing on a whole host of topics, from a position of ignorance, literally the whole time.

[ConfusedJew]

That definition "in part" can apply to any war.

[Wahrheitssucher]

You yourself won’t even admit it is definitely occurring!!
…Which makes YOU a jewish genocide denier.
…Israeli jews are deliberately starving non-jews to death in occupied Palestine
…they are even shooting the starving people dead as they queue for food-aid.
What sort of wicked mind-set comes on a discussion forum, proudly proclaims to be jewish and suggests it might not be happening… [snip]

I don't know what is happening there.

…The intent is not to kill all of the Palestinians so it wouldn't be genocide, but…

…Shameful.
Plus you do not know what the definition of genocide is, CJ.

Definition
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
Article II
…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
— Killing members of the group;
— Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
— Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
— Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

https://www.un.org/en/genocide-prevention/definition

What are you doing here, CJ?
You don’t show any curiosity.
Plus you have been arguing on a whole host of topics, from a position of ignorance, literally the whole time.

That definition "in part" can apply to any war.

Wow! Stubbornly ignorant, stupid and wicked!

This person is a genocide denier.

First off, it is jewish propaganda to call the nearly 2 year onslaught against a defenceless, imprisoned, civilian population a “war”.

Mass-murdering and maiming many tens of thousands of civilians who are predominantly women, children and the elderly and deliberately targeting them is only a “war” in the minds of wicked people taught to hate.

CJ: “The intent is not to kill all of the Palestinians so it wouldn't be genocide”.

Try this confused jew: “The intent in WW2 was not to kill all of the Jews, so it wasn’t a genocide.”

SUMMARY:
CJ is misusing the word “war” and denying the accepted definition of “genocide”.

CONCLUSION:
It is impossible to have a sane discussion with someone who deliberately misuses words and distorts their meanings. They are not interested in sane discussion.